The dilemmas of regional states: How Southeast Asian states view and respond to India–China maritime competition

Q1 Social Sciences Asian Security Pub Date : 2018-11-13 DOI:10.1080/14799855.2019.1539819
Sinderpal Singh
{"title":"The dilemmas of regional states: How Southeast Asian states view and respond to India–China maritime competition","authors":"Sinderpal Singh","doi":"10.1080/14799855.2019.1539819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines contemporary perceptions and the corresponding responses of Southeast Asian states vis-à-vis India–China maritime competition. Specifically, it examines the cases of Singapore, Vietnam, and the Philippines. These countries provide useful cross-comparisons as, bilaterally, all three states relate uniquely to China and the maritime disputes in the South China Sea on the basis of two structural conditions – their formal security relationship with the US and whether they are a claimant state in the South China Sea dispute. The link between the range afforded by these three cases and the manner in which it drives their perceptions towards India–China maritime competition forms the core of this article. These three countries perceive differing levels of threat from China and have chosen a range of external balancing strategies to deal with these perceived threats. The nature of US–China and India–China security competition, the latter specifically in the maritime realm, structures the external balancing strategies they have pursued. There are, this article argues, important links between US–China and India–China strategic competition in structuring the external balancing strategies these countries pursue.","PeriodicalId":35162,"journal":{"name":"Asian Security","volume":"9 1","pages":"44 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.1539819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines contemporary perceptions and the corresponding responses of Southeast Asian states vis-à-vis India–China maritime competition. Specifically, it examines the cases of Singapore, Vietnam, and the Philippines. These countries provide useful cross-comparisons as, bilaterally, all three states relate uniquely to China and the maritime disputes in the South China Sea on the basis of two structural conditions – their formal security relationship with the US and whether they are a claimant state in the South China Sea dispute. The link between the range afforded by these three cases and the manner in which it drives their perceptions towards India–China maritime competition forms the core of this article. These three countries perceive differing levels of threat from China and have chosen a range of external balancing strategies to deal with these perceived threats. The nature of US–China and India–China security competition, the latter specifically in the maritime realm, structures the external balancing strategies they have pursued. There are, this article argues, important links between US–China and India–China strategic competition in structuring the external balancing strategies these countries pursue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区国家的困境:东南亚国家如何看待和应对印中海上竞争
本文考察了东南亚国家对-à-vis印中海上竞争的当代看法和相应的反应。具体来说,它考察了新加坡、越南和菲律宾的情况。这些国家提供了有用的交叉比较,因为在双边关系上,这三个国家都是基于两个结构性条件——它们与美国的正式安全关系,以及它们是否是南中国海争端的声索国——与中国和南中国海的海洋争端有独特的关系。这三个案例所提供的范围与它们对印中海上竞争的看法之间的联系构成了本文的核心。这三个国家对来自中国的威胁程度不同,并选择了一系列外部平衡战略来应对这些威胁。中美和印中安全竞争的本质,特别是在海洋领域,构成了他们所追求的外部平衡战略。本文认为,中美和印中战略竞争在构建这些国家追求的外部平衡战略方面存在重要联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Security
Asian Security Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Redefining NATO’s Indo-Pacific partnerships: cooperative security meets collective defence and deterrence Political regimes and self-reliance in the Indian arms industry Sailing close to the wind: Japan’s forward deterrence posture toward the Taiwan Strait A neoclassical realist analysis of the evolving Philippines–India defense partnership in the twenty-first century The dragon in central Asia: Is China’s increased economic involvement resulting in security gains?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1