Metadata for Electronic Theses and Dissertations: A Survey of Institutional Repositories

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Library Metadata Pub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19386389.2016.1161462
Tom Steele, Nicole Sump-crethar
{"title":"Metadata for Electronic Theses and Dissertations: A Survey of Institutional Repositories","authors":"Tom Steele, Nicole Sump-crethar","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2016.1161462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explains the results of an online survey of academic institutional repositories in the United States conducted in an effort to answer the following questions: (a) What metadata do institutional repositories use to describe and provide access to their theses and dissertations? (b) What quality control is being done for this metadata, and are quality control and controlled vocabulary even important in a digital repository? The survey found a general consensus among institutions on using the title, abstract, type, author, and subject fields. While there was disagreement on the importance of controlled vocabulary, respondents agreed quality control was important.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"9 1","pages":"53 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1161462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study explains the results of an online survey of academic institutional repositories in the United States conducted in an effort to answer the following questions: (a) What metadata do institutional repositories use to describe and provide access to their theses and dissertations? (b) What quality control is being done for this metadata, and are quality control and controlled vocabulary even important in a digital repository? The survey found a general consensus among institutions on using the title, abstract, type, author, and subject fields. While there was disagreement on the importance of controlled vocabulary, respondents agreed quality control was important.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子论文元数据:机构资料库调查
本研究解释了一项对美国学术机构知识库进行的在线调查的结果,该调查旨在回答以下问题:(a)机构知识库使用什么元数据来描述和提供对其论文和学位论文的访问?(b)对这种元数据进行了什么质量控制,质量控制和受控词汇在数字存储库中是否重要?调查发现,各机构在使用标题、摘要、类型、作者和主题领域方面达成了普遍共识。虽然对控制词汇的重要性存在分歧,但受访者同意质量控制很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Metadata
Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Metadata Management in Data Lake Environments: A Survey A Minimal Metadata Schema and Its Tool to Improve the Searchableness of Research Data in Bioinformatics Changes in Digital Collections and Their Metadata: A Longitudinal Study of UIUC Digital Library Common Metadata Framework for Research Data Repository: Necessity to Support Open Science Entity Management Using RDA and Wikibase: A Case Study at the National Library of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1