Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Crash Injury Severity in Yemen: Hospital Case Study

IF 4.6 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Applied and Computational Mathematics Pub Date : 2020-09-29 DOI:10.11648/J.ACM.20200905.12
Tariq Al-Moqri, Xiao Haijun, J. P. Namahoro, E. Alfalahi, Ibrahim Alwesabi
{"title":"Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Crash Injury Severity in Yemen: Hospital Case Study","authors":"Tariq Al-Moqri, Xiao Haijun, J. P. Namahoro, E. Alfalahi, Ibrahim Alwesabi","doi":"10.11648/J.ACM.20200905.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on exploiting machine learning algorithms for classifying and predicting injury severity of vehicle crashes in Yemen. The primary objective is to assess the contribution of the leading causes of injury severity. The selected machine learning algorithms compared with traditional statistical methods. The filtrated second data collected within two months (August-October 2015) from the two main hospitals included 156 injured patients of vehicle crashes reported from 128 locations. The data classified into three categories of injury severity: Severe, Serious, and Minor. It balanced using a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). Multinomial logit model (MNL) compared with five machine learning classifiers: Naive Bayes (NB), J48 Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The results showed that most of machine learning-based algorithms performed well in predicting and classifying the severity of the traffic injury. Out of five classifiers, RF is the best classifier with 94.84% of accuracy. The characteristics of road type, total injured person, crash type, road user, transport way to the emergency department (ED), and accident action were the most critical factors in the severity of the traffic injury. Enhancing strategies for using roadway facilities may improve the safety of road users and regulations.","PeriodicalId":55503,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Computational Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Computational Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ACM.20200905.12","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study focused on exploiting machine learning algorithms for classifying and predicting injury severity of vehicle crashes in Yemen. The primary objective is to assess the contribution of the leading causes of injury severity. The selected machine learning algorithms compared with traditional statistical methods. The filtrated second data collected within two months (August-October 2015) from the two main hospitals included 156 injured patients of vehicle crashes reported from 128 locations. The data classified into three categories of injury severity: Severe, Serious, and Minor. It balanced using a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). Multinomial logit model (MNL) compared with five machine learning classifiers: Naive Bayes (NB), J48 Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The results showed that most of machine learning-based algorithms performed well in predicting and classifying the severity of the traffic injury. Out of five classifiers, RF is the best classifier with 94.84% of accuracy. The characteristics of road type, total injured person, crash type, road user, transport way to the emergency department (ED), and accident action were the most critical factors in the severity of the traffic injury. Enhancing strategies for using roadway facilities may improve the safety of road users and regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习算法预测也门碰撞伤害严重程度:医院案例研究
本研究的重点是利用机器学习算法对也门车辆碰撞的伤害严重程度进行分类和预测。主要目的是评估损伤严重程度的主要原因的贡献。所选择的机器学习算法与传统的统计方法进行了比较。在两个月内(2015年8月至10月)从两家主要医院收集的过滤后的第二次数据包括来自128个地点报告的156名车祸伤者。数据分为三种损伤严重程度:严重、严重和轻微。它使用合成少数过采样技术(SMOTE)进行平衡。多项logit模型(MNL)与五种机器学习分类器:朴素贝叶斯(NB)、J48决策树、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和多层感知器(MLP)进行了比较。结果表明,大多数基于机器学习的算法在预测和分类交通伤害严重程度方面表现良好。在5个分类器中,RF是最好的分类器,准确率为94.84%。道路类型特征、受伤总人数特征、碰撞类型特征、道路使用者特征、前往急诊科的运输方式特征和事故行为特征是影响交通伤害严重程度的最关键因素。加强道路设施的使用策略可以提高道路使用者的安全性和法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Computational Mathematics (ISSN Online: 2328-5613, ISSN Print: 2328-5605) is a prestigious journal that focuses on the field of applied and computational mathematics. It is driven by the computational revolution and places a strong emphasis on innovative applied mathematics with potential for real-world applicability and practicality. The journal caters to a broad audience of applied mathematicians and scientists who are interested in the advancement of mathematical principles and practical aspects of computational mathematics. Researchers from various disciplines can benefit from the diverse range of topics covered in ACM. To ensure the publication of high-quality content, all research articles undergo a rigorous peer review process. This process includes an initial screening by the editors and anonymous evaluation by expert reviewers. This guarantees that only the most valuable and accurate research is published in ACM.
期刊最新文献
Novel Integer Division for Embedded Systems: Generic Algorithm Optimal for Large Divisors Exploring Hidden Markov Models in the Context of Genetic Disorders, and Related Conditions: A Systematic Review Error Approximation of the Second Order Hyperbolic Differential Equationby Using DG Finite Element Method Some New Results on Domination and Independent Dominating Set of Some Graphs Soret and Dufour Effects on MHD Fluid Flow Through a Collapssible Tube Using Spectral Based Collocation Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1