{"title":"Panel: eXtreme Programming: helpful or harmful?","authors":"H. Saiedian","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concerns over the selection of the most effective methodology (or best practices) is also reflected in debates within the software engineering education circles. Here, the software engineering educators will have to decide which methodology is the right one for teaching the next generation of software engineers, or integrating into the software engineering education curricula. An excellent report [ 1 ] provides a brief review of several such methodologies as well as evaluative research and instructional issues related to agile methods and their potential impact. This panel provides two opposing views vis-hvis incorporating agile processes, and in particular eXtreme Programming, into software engineering education. The panel will be conducted slightly different from the traditional approaches. It will include normal paper presentations by the authors, followed by plenary debate. The first paper (authored by Lars Benedix, G/Sel Hedin, and Boris Magnusson) presents an experience from using eXtreme Programming to teach software engineering concepts in an undergraduate course with over 100 students. The authors' experience is very positive. The second paper (authored by Jean-Guy Schneider and Lorraine Johnston) conclude that introducing an agile process such as eXtreme Programming in software engineering education is not a straightforward task and the corresponding practices may run counter to educational goals. The paper presentations will serve as authors' position statements. Discussion and debate will follow.","PeriodicalId":91595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"126 1","pages":"718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concerns over the selection of the most effective methodology (or best practices) is also reflected in debates within the software engineering education circles. Here, the software engineering educators will have to decide which methodology is the right one for teaching the next generation of software engineers, or integrating into the software engineering education curricula. An excellent report [ 1 ] provides a brief review of several such methodologies as well as evaluative research and instructional issues related to agile methods and their potential impact. This panel provides two opposing views vis-hvis incorporating agile processes, and in particular eXtreme Programming, into software engineering education. The panel will be conducted slightly different from the traditional approaches. It will include normal paper presentations by the authors, followed by plenary debate. The first paper (authored by Lars Benedix, G/Sel Hedin, and Boris Magnusson) presents an experience from using eXtreme Programming to teach software engineering concepts in an undergraduate course with over 100 students. The authors' experience is very positive. The second paper (authored by Jean-Guy Schneider and Lorraine Johnston) conclude that introducing an agile process such as eXtreme Programming in software engineering education is not a straightforward task and the corresponding practices may run counter to educational goals. The paper presentations will serve as authors' position statements. Discussion and debate will follow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专题讨论:极限编程:有益还是有害?
对选择最有效的方法(或最佳实践)的关注也反映在软件工程教育界的争论中。在这里,软件工程教育者将不得不决定哪种方法是教授下一代软件工程师的正确方法,或者将哪种方法集成到软件工程教育课程中。一份优秀的报告[1]简要回顾了几种这样的方法,以及与敏捷方法及其潜在影响相关的评估性研究和指导性问题。这个小组提供了两种相反的观点,即如何将敏捷过程,特别是极限编程,纳入软件工程教育。该小组的方式将与传统方法略有不同。会议将包括作者的常规论文介绍,然后是全体辩论。第一篇论文(由Lars Benedix, G/Sel Hedin和Boris Magnusson撰写)介绍了在100多名学生的本科课程中使用极限编程教授软件工程概念的经验。作者的经历是非常积极的。第二篇论文(由Jean-Guy Schneider和Lorraine Johnston撰写)得出结论,在软件工程教育中引入敏捷过程(如极限编程)并不是一项简单的任务,相应的实践可能与教育目标背道而驰。论文介绍将作为作者的立场声明。随后将进行讨论和辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the ICSE 2023 Program Co-Chairs Message from the ICSE 2022 Program Chairs Message from the ICSE 2022 General Chair Multi-Objective Regression Test Selection On the Interplay Between Static and Dynamic Analysis for Mining Sandboxes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1