Regulatory Capital Management: Fair Value Measurement and Regulatory Capital Ratios

Q4 Social Sciences Credit and Capital Markets Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.3790/ccm.52.3.375
Felix Krauß
{"title":"Regulatory Capital Management: Fair Value Measurement and Regulatory Capital Ratios","authors":"Felix Krauß","doi":"10.3790/ccm.52.3.375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The calculation of the regulatory capital ratios according to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) is based on the IFRS consolidated financial statements. Therefore, banks are able to influence their regulatory capital ratios through discretionary powers when measuring with fair values according to IFRS 13. This paper analyzes the effects that discretionary fair value changes have on the regulatory capital ratios. Furthermore, the impact of the prudent valuation according to article 105 CRR on the regulatory capital ratios is examined. While the results depend on a multitude of factors and vary from case to case, there are situations in which the same fair value change of an identical financial asset can have opposing effects on certain regulatory capital ratios depending on bank specific factors like its regulatory capitalization or its tax rate. As a result, decreasing fair values can in some circumstances lead to higher regulatory capital ratios and thus, indicate a greater solvency. In order to identify possible conflicts of interest, the effects of fair value changes on the comprehensive income are also included in the analysis because the comprehensive income serves as an important target figure for banks in addition to the regulatory capital ratios. JEL Classification: F380, G380, M410, M480","PeriodicalId":36966,"journal":{"name":"Credit and Capital Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Credit and Capital Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.52.3.375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The calculation of the regulatory capital ratios according to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) is based on the IFRS consolidated financial statements. Therefore, banks are able to influence their regulatory capital ratios through discretionary powers when measuring with fair values according to IFRS 13. This paper analyzes the effects that discretionary fair value changes have on the regulatory capital ratios. Furthermore, the impact of the prudent valuation according to article 105 CRR on the regulatory capital ratios is examined. While the results depend on a multitude of factors and vary from case to case, there are situations in which the same fair value change of an identical financial asset can have opposing effects on certain regulatory capital ratios depending on bank specific factors like its regulatory capitalization or its tax rate. As a result, decreasing fair values can in some circumstances lead to higher regulatory capital ratios and thus, indicate a greater solvency. In order to identify possible conflicts of interest, the effects of fair value changes on the comprehensive income are also included in the analysis because the comprehensive income serves as an important target figure for banks in addition to the regulatory capital ratios. JEL Classification: F380, G380, M410, M480
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管资本管理:公允价值计量与监管资本比率
根据资本要求条例(CRR)计算监管资本比率是基于国际财务报告准则合并财务报表。因此,银行在根据IFRS 13以公允价值计量时,能够通过自由裁量权影响其监管资本比率。本文分析了自由裁量公允价值变动对监管资本比率的影响。此外,本文还考察了第105条规定的审慎估值对监管资本比率的影响。虽然结果取决于多种因素,并且因情况而异,但在某些情况下,同一金融资产的相同公允价值变化可能会对某些监管资本比率产生相反的影响,这取决于银行的监管资本或税率等特定因素。因此,在某些情况下,公允价值的减少可能导致更高的监管资本比率,从而表明更大的偿付能力。为了识别可能的利益冲突,公允价值变化对综合收益的影响也包括在分析中,因为综合收益是银行除了监管资本比率之外的重要目标数字。JEL分类:F380、G380、M410、M480
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Credit and Capital Markets
Credit and Capital Markets Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
54th Konstanz Seminar on Monetary Theory and Policy 2023 A Novel Default Risk Prediction and Feature Importance Analysis Technique for Marketplace Lending using Machine Learning German FinTech Companies: A Market Overview and Volume Estimates FinTech and the Digital Transformation in the Financial Industry Towards a Theory on Dominant Business Model Emergence of Marketplace Lending in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1