Subjective Wellbeing in Rural and Urban Central Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2008 and 2018)

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI:10.1080/00207659.2022.2089806
Vladimir Ivanović, Bruno Šimac, Tijana Trako Poljak
{"title":"Subjective Wellbeing in Rural and Urban Central Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2008 and 2018)","authors":"Vladimir Ivanović, Bruno Šimac, Tijana Trako Poljak","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2022.2089806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social surveys on wellbeing have been increasingly including measures of subjective wellbeing, alongside more often used objective ones, as they show the importance of a more comprehensive approach to understanding what constitutes good and happy lives. This paper relies on the European Social Survey (ESS) data from Round 4 (2008) and Round 9 (2018) to analyze and compare subjective wellbeing (SWB) in rural and urban areas of eight Central European countries: Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia. Based on available ESS items, we have constructed a more concise version of the VanderWeele et al.’s Flourishing Index, which we termed the Subjective Wellbeing Index (SWI), and which includes the following domains: (1) happiness and life satisfaction, (2) mental and physical health, and (3) financial and material stability. The main results indicate that all eight CE countries have relatively high and improving SWI scores, but stable relational position over the ten-year period. When looking at the rural-urban subsamples, all countries scored higher on the SWI in urban areas in 2008, with significant improvements in the rural areas of more affluent EU countries by 2018 as Austrian, Czech and German rural areas exhibited higher SWI scores than their urban counterparts.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":"46 1","pages":"397 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2022.2089806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Social surveys on wellbeing have been increasingly including measures of subjective wellbeing, alongside more often used objective ones, as they show the importance of a more comprehensive approach to understanding what constitutes good and happy lives. This paper relies on the European Social Survey (ESS) data from Round 4 (2008) and Round 9 (2018) to analyze and compare subjective wellbeing (SWB) in rural and urban areas of eight Central European countries: Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia. Based on available ESS items, we have constructed a more concise version of the VanderWeele et al.’s Flourishing Index, which we termed the Subjective Wellbeing Index (SWI), and which includes the following domains: (1) happiness and life satisfaction, (2) mental and physical health, and (3) financial and material stability. The main results indicate that all eight CE countries have relatively high and improving SWI scores, but stable relational position over the ten-year period. When looking at the rural-urban subsamples, all countries scored higher on the SWI in urban areas in 2008, with significant improvements in the rural areas of more affluent EU countries by 2018 as Austrian, Czech and German rural areas exhibited higher SWI scores than their urban counterparts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧城乡主观幸福感:来自欧洲社会调查(2008年和2018年)的证据
关于幸福的社会调查越来越多地包括主观幸福的衡量标准,以及更常用的客观衡量标准,因为它们显示了一种更全面的方法来理解什么是美好和幸福的生活的重要性。本文依靠欧洲社会调查(ESS)第4轮(2008年)和第9轮(2018年)的数据,分析和比较了八个中欧国家(奥地利、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、德国、匈牙利、波兰、斯洛文尼亚和斯洛伐克)农村和城市地区的主观幸福感(SWB)。基于现有的ESS项目,我们构建了一个更简洁的VanderWeele等人的繁荣指数,我们称之为主观幸福指数(SWI),它包括以下领域:(1)幸福和生活满意度,(2)心理和身体健康,(3)经济和物质稳定。主要结果表明,8个CE国家的SWI得分都相对较高且在不断提高,但在10年期间保持稳定的关系地位。当观察城乡亚样本时,2008年所有国家的城市地区的SWI得分都较高,到2018年,较富裕的欧盟国家的农村地区的SWI得分显著提高,因为奥地利、捷克和德国的农村地区表现出高于城市地区的SWI得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Including Marine-Related Items in the ISSP Environment Module is Important for a More Holistic Measure of Public Environmental Perceptions Automated Futures, Altered Priorities: The Impact of Technological Change on Environmental Attitudes and Policies Do “environmental losers” pay the price? The role of individual and country vulnerabilities in the relationship between environmental concern and willingness to pay to protect the environment Varying Vistas: Exploring the Uneven Impacts of World Society Integration on Cross-National Particulate Air Pollution Using Unconditional Quantile Regression What Prospects for Working Poor? Central Europe’s Experience with Dynamics of In-work Poverty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1