Dis/parity: Blackness and the (Im)possibility of a Pentecostal (Political) Theology

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Pneuma Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1163/15700747-bja10075
M. Millner
{"title":"Dis/parity: Blackness and the (Im)possibility of a Pentecostal (Political) Theology","authors":"M. Millner","doi":"10.1163/15700747-bja10075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n American pentecostal political theology is not marked by a fivefold gospel, as key theologians contend, but is best understood as the justification of the color line. That term, popularized by W.E.B. Du Bois, is a theological-political term, and was invoked at Azusa Street. The color line is a spatial and racial order that is both politically and theologically inaugurated and upheld. Political theology, as such, is anti-Black. But at Azusa Street, a Black-led and interracial revival, the color line is washed away. Persons and practices excluded by the color line, and racialized as Black, reject the terms of order and generate the order’s undoing. If this undoing becomes the central interpretive grid for “pentecostal,” then the terms “pentecostal” and “Black” are read synonymously and over against political theology as terms of order. By turning to this generating mode of the Blackness of pentecostal origins, the impossibility of doing a pentecostal political theology emerges.","PeriodicalId":43699,"journal":{"name":"Pneuma","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneuma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-bja10075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American pentecostal political theology is not marked by a fivefold gospel, as key theologians contend, but is best understood as the justification of the color line. That term, popularized by W.E.B. Du Bois, is a theological-political term, and was invoked at Azusa Street. The color line is a spatial and racial order that is both politically and theologically inaugurated and upheld. Political theology, as such, is anti-Black. But at Azusa Street, a Black-led and interracial revival, the color line is washed away. Persons and practices excluded by the color line, and racialized as Black, reject the terms of order and generate the order’s undoing. If this undoing becomes the central interpretive grid for “pentecostal,” then the terms “pentecostal” and “Black” are read synonymously and over against political theology as terms of order. By turning to this generating mode of the Blackness of pentecostal origins, the impossibility of doing a pentecostal political theology emerges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dis/parity:黑人和五旬节派(政治)神学的(Im)可能性
美国五旬节派的政治神学并不像关键神学家所主张的那样,以五重福音为标志,而是最好被理解为种族界限的正当理由。这个词由杜波依斯(W.E.B. Du Bois)推广,是一个神学政治术语,在阿祖萨街(Azusa Street)被引用。肤色界线是一种空间和种族秩序,在政治上和神学上都得到了开创和维护。政治神学本身就是反黑人的。但在黑人领导的跨种族复兴运动阿祖萨街,种族界限被洗去了。被肤色线排除在外的人和行为,以及被种族化为黑人的人,拒绝秩序的条款,并导致秩序的毁灭。如果这种毁灭成为“五旬节派”的中心解释网格,那么“五旬节派”和“黑人”这两个词就被同义解读,并作为秩序的术语与政治神学对立。通过转向这种五旬节派起源的黑暗面的产生模式,做一个五旬节派政治神学的不可能性出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneuma
Pneuma RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Commission, Mission and Migration in Acts Is Acts Really “The Most Overtly Missionary Book”? Reading the Pentecostal Interpretations of the Book of Acts Contrapuntally Tongues of Fire: Giving Voice to Pentecostal Theology Vindicating Spirit, Deceiving Spirits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1