Multiple Dimensions of Environmental Justice and Oil and Gas Development in Pennsylvania.

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1089/env.2022.0041
Wil Lieberman-Cribbin, Xin Fang, Rachel Morello-Frosch, David J X Gonzalez, Elaine Hill, Nicole C Deziel, Jonathan J Buonocore, Joan A Casey
{"title":"Multiple Dimensions of Environmental Justice and Oil and Gas Development in Pennsylvania.","authors":"Wil Lieberman-Cribbin, Xin Fang, Rachel Morello-Frosch, David J X Gonzalez, Elaine Hill, Nicole C Deziel, Jonathan J Buonocore, Joan A Casey","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD) may be related to higher oil and natural gas development (OGD) exposure. We tested for distributive and benefit-sharing environmental injustice in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale by examining (1) whether OGD and waste disposal occurred disproportionately in more deprived communities and (2) discordance between the location of land leased for OGD and where oil and gas rights owners resided.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Analyses took place at the county subdivision level and considered OGD wells, waste disposal, and land lease agreement locations from 2005 to 2019. Using 2005-2009 American Community Survey data, we created a CSD index relevant to community vulnerability in suburban/rural areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted regression models accounting for spatial dependence, we observed no association between the CSD index and conventional or unconventional drilled well presence. However, a higher CSD index was linearly associated with odds of a subdivision having an OGD waste disposal site and receiving a larger volume of waste. A higher percentage of oil and gas rights owners lived in the same county subdivision as leased land when the community was least versus most deprived (66% vs. 56% in same county subdivision), suggesting that individuals in more deprived communities were less likely to financially benefit from OGD exposure.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>We observed distributive environmental injustice with respect to well waste disposal and benefit-sharing environmental injustice related to oil and rights owner's residential locations across Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale. These results add evidence of a disparity between exposure and benefits resulting from OGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10880506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD) may be related to higher oil and natural gas development (OGD) exposure. We tested for distributive and benefit-sharing environmental injustice in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale by examining (1) whether OGD and waste disposal occurred disproportionately in more deprived communities and (2) discordance between the location of land leased for OGD and where oil and gas rights owners resided.

Materials and methods: Analyses took place at the county subdivision level and considered OGD wells, waste disposal, and land lease agreement locations from 2005 to 2019. Using 2005-2009 American Community Survey data, we created a CSD index relevant to community vulnerability in suburban/rural areas.

Results: In adjusted regression models accounting for spatial dependence, we observed no association between the CSD index and conventional or unconventional drilled well presence. However, a higher CSD index was linearly associated with odds of a subdivision having an OGD waste disposal site and receiving a larger volume of waste. A higher percentage of oil and gas rights owners lived in the same county subdivision as leased land when the community was least versus most deprived (66% vs. 56% in same county subdivision), suggesting that individuals in more deprived communities were less likely to financially benefit from OGD exposure.

Discussion and conclusions: We observed distributive environmental injustice with respect to well waste disposal and benefit-sharing environmental injustice related to oil and rights owner's residential locations across Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale. These results add evidence of a disparity between exposure and benefits resulting from OGD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宾夕法尼亚州环境正义与石油和天然气开发的多个层面。
背景:社区社会经济贫困(CSD)可能与较高的石油和天然气开发(OGD)风险有关。我们在宾夕法尼亚州的马塞勒斯页岩地区测试了分配和利益分享方面的环境不公正,具体方法是:(1) 石油和天然气开发及废物处理是否过多地发生在更贫困的社区;(2) 石油和天然气开发所租赁土地的位置与石油和天然气权利所有者居住地之间的不一致:分析在县分区层面进行,考虑了 2005 年至 2019 年的 OGD 井、废物处理和土地租赁协议地点。利用 2005-2009 年美国社区调查数据,我们创建了与郊区/农村地区社区脆弱性相关的 CSD 指数:在考虑了空间依赖性的调整回归模型中,我们观察到 CSD 指数与常规或非常规钻井的存在之间没有关联。然而,较高的 CSD 指数与一个分区拥有一个 OGD 废弃物处理场和接收较大量废弃物的几率呈线性相关。在最贫困社区与最贫困社区中,油气开采权所有者居住在与租赁土地相同的县分区的比例较高(66% 与 56% 居住在相同的县分区),这表明较贫困社区中的个人不太可能从 OGD 暴露中获得经济利益:我们观察到,在宾夕法尼亚州马塞勒斯页岩地区,油井废物处理方面存在分配性环境不公正,而石油和采矿权所有者的居住地则存在利益分享性环境不公正。这些结果进一步证明了油气脱硫造成的暴露和利益之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Citizens Through the Development and Deployment of a Community-Based Environmental Health Reporting Tool Electronic Monitoring Policy at Sea Beyond “Human Bycatch” The Lack of Real-Time Air Pollution Monitoring in Africa Supports Environmental Injustice What a Difference a Datum Makes: Revisiting the Impacts of Cap-and-Trade on Emissions and Environmental Justice Mixed Methods Approaches: Structures and Methodologies for Cumulative Impact Assessment Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1