Fine needle aspiration cytology versus trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer- A comparative study

C. Shashirekha, R. R. Singh, H. Ravikiran, K. Prasad, P. Sreeramulu
{"title":"Fine needle aspiration cytology versus trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer- A comparative study","authors":"C. Shashirekha, R. R. Singh, H. Ravikiran, K. Prasad, P. Sreeramulu","doi":"10.7439/IJBR.V8I9.4329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most diseases of the breast present as a palpable mass. The majority of breast lesions are not malignant, and most benign lesions do not progress to cancer; however the accuracy of diagnosis can be increased by a combination of preoperative tests like physical examination, mammography, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and Tru cut needle biopsy (TGNB) or core needle biopsy (CNB). FNAC has grown in popularity and became the first initial used procedure after history taking and clinical examination for diagnosis of solid and cystic breast lumps. This study was designated to investigate the accuracy of FNAC in comparison to TCNB for diagnosis of breast masses. Design: Retrospective Study Materials &Methods: In this study, 62 patients having breast lumps were studied during the period from January 2014 to January 2017 in terms of FNAC and Trucut Biopsy and were compared with tissue diagnosis. Variables like age, marital status, duration, size, menstrual status & site were analyzed using statistical analysis. Results: Out of 62 patients with breast lump, 32 were diagnosed with Benign Breast lesions, and 30 with malignant lesions. Sensitivity of FNAC and TRUCUT biopsy were 84.34% and 97.1% respectively. TRUCUT was more accurate when compared to FNAC.","PeriodicalId":13909,"journal":{"name":"International journal of biomedical research","volume":"20 1","pages":"497-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBR.V8I9.4329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Most diseases of the breast present as a palpable mass. The majority of breast lesions are not malignant, and most benign lesions do not progress to cancer; however the accuracy of diagnosis can be increased by a combination of preoperative tests like physical examination, mammography, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and Tru cut needle biopsy (TGNB) or core needle biopsy (CNB). FNAC has grown in popularity and became the first initial used procedure after history taking and clinical examination for diagnosis of solid and cystic breast lumps. This study was designated to investigate the accuracy of FNAC in comparison to TCNB for diagnosis of breast masses. Design: Retrospective Study Materials &Methods: In this study, 62 patients having breast lumps were studied during the period from January 2014 to January 2017 in terms of FNAC and Trucut Biopsy and were compared with tissue diagnosis. Variables like age, marital status, duration, size, menstrual status & site were analyzed using statistical analysis. Results: Out of 62 patients with breast lump, 32 were diagnosed with Benign Breast lesions, and 30 with malignant lesions. Sensitivity of FNAC and TRUCUT biopsy were 84.34% and 97.1% respectively. TRUCUT was more accurate when compared to FNAC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细针抽吸细胞学与乳腺活检诊断乳腺癌的比较研究
背景:大多数乳腺疾病表现为可触及的肿块。大多数乳腺病变不是恶性的,大多数良性病变不会发展为癌症;然而,通过结合术前检查,如体格检查、乳房x光检查、细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)和Tru切针活检(TGNB)或核心针活检(CNB),可以提高诊断的准确性。FNAC越来越受欢迎,并成为在病史和临床检查后诊断实性和囊性乳房肿块的第一种初始应用程序。本研究旨在探讨FNAC与TCNB在诊断乳腺肿块方面的准确性。设计:回顾性研究材料与方法:本研究对2014年1月至2017年1月62例乳腺肿块患者进行FNAC和Trucut活检,并与组织诊断进行比较。年龄、婚姻状况、病程、体长、月经状况、部位等变量采用统计学方法进行分析。结果:62例乳腺肿块中32例为乳腺良性病变,30例为乳腺恶性病变。FNAC和TRUCUT活检的敏感性分别为84.34%和97.1%。与FNAC相比,TRUCUT更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study of post-cesarean surgical site infections in a tertiary care unit Lassa fever: A recurring decimal in Plateau state, Nigeria Knowledge, attitude, practice of hand hygiene among nursing staff in medicine ICU in a tertiary health care centre in Western India Evaluation of Serum Creatine Phosphokinase as a Marker of Severity in Organophosphorus Poisoning Yellow fever outbreak in Plateau state, Nigeria: A re-emerging disease or a case of misdiagnosis over the years?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1