Research Notes: Understanding the Physical Poetry of a Parallel American Dream

Pub Date : 2019-05-06 DOI:10.5749/BUILDLAND.25.2.0095
Travis C. McDonald
{"title":"Research Notes: Understanding the Physical Poetry of a Parallel American Dream","authors":"Travis C. McDonald","doi":"10.5749/BUILDLAND.25.2.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anne Spencer (1882– 1975) was an African Ameri can high school librarian in Lynchburg, Virginia, who became nationally known, if not by her own choosing, as a poet of the Harlem Renaissance during the 1920s. The 1903 house Anne built with her husband Edward is now a National Register property and Virginia Landmark house museum, known principally for its personal and eclectic interior and flower garden, which evolved over a sixtytwoyear period. This essay considers how to interpret this remarkable yet littleknown historic site, which represents an artistic and architectural creation that is inextricably based on, and exhibits, the ephemeral characteristics of flowers and poetry. Fieldwork at the Anne and Edward Spencer house prompts questions about how and why we record what we record. The site defies typical interpretations, and even the widenet approaches found in VAF’s Invitation to Vernacular Architecture. In this case many of the fields through which architectural history is now studied overlap: ethnicity, gender, class, race, sociology, feminism, and economics. A Venn diagram of intersecting subjects at this site would thicken with the major themes of architecture, art, interior decorating, decorative arts, craftsmanship, material culture, gardening, and poetry. The diversity of new fields and the range of subjects within those fields have led to a broader but more fragmented view of architectural history. Dell Upton characterized architecture as “the art of social storytelling, a means for shaping American society and culture.” That is surely the more public macro lens though which to see the Spencer site. Upton also acknowledged that in some cases architecture was “a vehicle of individual aesthetic expression.” This is the more challenging and private micro lens through which to see Anne Spencer’s artistic creation. Particularly challenging to confront is how the ephemeral and everchanging essence of Anne Spencer’s garden found expression both in her poetry and in her interior decorations and furnishings (Figure 1). Anne managed to describe the colors, smells, and textures of flowers in words, writing, “Earth, I thank you / for the pleasure of your language.” She effectively used poetry to capture the nuances of nature, but describing the poetry of colors, patterns, and textures of an interior setting, inspired by the same ephemeral beauty of nature, challenges our typical interpretive conventions. Literary and artistic shrines can evoke the autobiographical nature of a writer’s or artist’s home and garden, yet few have the symbiotic spirit and presence of poetry, flowers, art, and architecture that define the Spencer house and garden. While Anne Spencer’s poetry and gardening have been studied to an extent, the house itself had been minimally documented before I took on what I thought would be the modest task of recording the interior and advising on restoration issues. The authenticity of the house rests on the fortunate circumstance that it was left virtually intact as a museum when Anne Spencer died in 1975. In Half My World: The Garden of Anne Spencer, Rebecca Frischkorn and Reuben Rainey describe Anne Spencer’s garden and poetry as “subtle, original, richly nuanced, and carefully crafted.” I soon began to realize that this was equally true travis Mcdonald","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/BUILDLAND.25.2.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anne Spencer (1882– 1975) was an African Ameri can high school librarian in Lynchburg, Virginia, who became nationally known, if not by her own choosing, as a poet of the Harlem Renaissance during the 1920s. The 1903 house Anne built with her husband Edward is now a National Register property and Virginia Landmark house museum, known principally for its personal and eclectic interior and flower garden, which evolved over a sixtytwoyear period. This essay considers how to interpret this remarkable yet littleknown historic site, which represents an artistic and architectural creation that is inextricably based on, and exhibits, the ephemeral characteristics of flowers and poetry. Fieldwork at the Anne and Edward Spencer house prompts questions about how and why we record what we record. The site defies typical interpretations, and even the widenet approaches found in VAF’s Invitation to Vernacular Architecture. In this case many of the fields through which architectural history is now studied overlap: ethnicity, gender, class, race, sociology, feminism, and economics. A Venn diagram of intersecting subjects at this site would thicken with the major themes of architecture, art, interior decorating, decorative arts, craftsmanship, material culture, gardening, and poetry. The diversity of new fields and the range of subjects within those fields have led to a broader but more fragmented view of architectural history. Dell Upton characterized architecture as “the art of social storytelling, a means for shaping American society and culture.” That is surely the more public macro lens though which to see the Spencer site. Upton also acknowledged that in some cases architecture was “a vehicle of individual aesthetic expression.” This is the more challenging and private micro lens through which to see Anne Spencer’s artistic creation. Particularly challenging to confront is how the ephemeral and everchanging essence of Anne Spencer’s garden found expression both in her poetry and in her interior decorations and furnishings (Figure 1). Anne managed to describe the colors, smells, and textures of flowers in words, writing, “Earth, I thank you / for the pleasure of your language.” She effectively used poetry to capture the nuances of nature, but describing the poetry of colors, patterns, and textures of an interior setting, inspired by the same ephemeral beauty of nature, challenges our typical interpretive conventions. Literary and artistic shrines can evoke the autobiographical nature of a writer’s or artist’s home and garden, yet few have the symbiotic spirit and presence of poetry, flowers, art, and architecture that define the Spencer house and garden. While Anne Spencer’s poetry and gardening have been studied to an extent, the house itself had been minimally documented before I took on what I thought would be the modest task of recording the interior and advising on restoration issues. The authenticity of the house rests on the fortunate circumstance that it was left virtually intact as a museum when Anne Spencer died in 1975. In Half My World: The Garden of Anne Spencer, Rebecca Frischkorn and Reuben Rainey describe Anne Spencer’s garden and poetry as “subtle, original, richly nuanced, and carefully crafted.” I soon began to realize that this was equally true travis Mcdonald
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
研究笔记:理解平行美国梦的物理诗歌
安妮·斯宾塞(1882 - 1975)是弗吉尼亚州林奇堡一所非裔美国高中的图书管理员,她在20世纪20年代成为全国知名的哈莱姆文艺复兴诗人,如果不是她自己的选择的话。1903年安妮和她的丈夫爱德华建造的房子现在是国家登记财产和弗吉尼亚地标房屋博物馆,主要以其个人和折衷的内部和花园而闻名,这是在62年的时间里发展起来的。这篇文章探讨了如何解读这一引人注目却鲜为人知的历史遗址,它代表了一种艺术和建筑创作,这种创作与花和诗的短暂性密不可分。在安妮和爱德华·斯宾塞家的实地考察引发了关于我们如何以及为什么记录我们记录的问题。该场地不符合典型的解释,甚至不符合VAF邀请乡土建筑的广泛方法。在这种情况下,建筑史研究的许多领域都是重叠的:种族、性别、阶级、种族、社会学、女权主义和经济学。在这个地点交叉学科的维恩图中,建筑、艺术、室内装饰、装饰艺术、工艺、物质文化、园艺和诗歌等主题将变得更加丰富。新领域的多样性和这些领域内学科的范围导致了建筑史的更广泛但更分散的观点。戴尔·厄普顿将建筑描述为“社会叙事的艺术,是塑造美国社会和文化的一种手段。”这当然是一个更公开的宏观视角来看待斯宾塞网站。厄普顿也承认,在某些情况下,建筑是“个人审美表达的载体”。这是观察安妮·斯宾塞艺术创作的更具挑战性和私密性的微镜头。尤其具有挑战性的是,安妮·斯宾塞花园的短暂和不断变化的本质是如何在她的诗歌和室内装饰和陈设中得到表达的(图1)。安妮设法用文字描述花朵的颜色、气味和质地,她写道:“大地,我感谢你/你的语言带给我的乐趣。”她有效地用诗歌捕捉了自然的细微差别,但在同样短暂的自然之美的启发下,描述了室内环境中色彩、图案和纹理的诗歌,挑战了我们典型的解释惯例。文学和艺术圣地可以唤起作家或艺术家的家和花园的自传体性质,但很少有诗,花,艺术和建筑的共生精神和存在,定义斯宾塞的房子和花园。虽然人们对安妮·斯宾塞(Anne Spencer)的诗歌和园艺进行了一定程度的研究,但在我开始记录室内环境并就修复问题提供建议之前,对这座房子本身的记录很少。这座房子的真实性取决于一个幸运的情况,1975年安妮·斯宾塞去世时,它作为博物馆几乎完好无损。在《我的半个世界:安妮·斯宾塞的花园》一书中,丽贝卡·弗里施科恩和鲁本·雷尼将安妮·斯宾塞的花园和诗歌描述为“微妙、原创、细致入微、精心制作”。我很快意识到特拉维斯·麦克唐纳也是如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1