Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of MESS and PSI in Lower Limb Amputation Following Trauma Presenting at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dala Kano

Yakubu Surajuddeen, A. Mamuda, B. Bello
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of MESS and PSI in Lower Limb Amputation Following Trauma Presenting at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dala Kano","authors":"Yakubu Surajuddeen, A. Mamuda, B. Bello","doi":"10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_148_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) and Predictive Salvage Index (PSI) are two common diagnostic tools used to assess traumatic limb for amputation or salvage. However, there is paucity of local data with regards to accuracy of the tools. Objective: This study is therefore aimed at comparing the accuracy and predictive value of MESS and PSI in lower limb salvage and amputation following trauma in National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala (NOHD), Kano. Methodology: Twenty-three individuals with mangled extremity participated in this hospital-based one-year prospective, interventional study. Socio-demographic data of participants were collected and recorded as well as the severity of the injury at the time of initial presentation using both MESS and PSI by the researcher while the Consulting surgeons went ahead to make their decision as per their clinical routine without any influence from the researcher. Results: Findings of the study showed that MESS has a high sensitivity score of 89% and a low to medium specificity score of 43.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47.1% while PSI had a high specificity with low to medium sensitivity scores of 81.25% and 55% respectively with a PPV of 62.50%. Conclusion: The result of this study showed that MESS had high sensitivity and low specificity than PSI which had higher specificity and lower sensitivity than MESS in predicting amputation and limb salvage in patients with mangled lower extremity injuries. It is, therefore, recommended that surgeons should use both tools in decision making of limb salvage and amputation for optimal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9110,"journal":{"name":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_148_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) and Predictive Salvage Index (PSI) are two common diagnostic tools used to assess traumatic limb for amputation or salvage. However, there is paucity of local data with regards to accuracy of the tools. Objective: This study is therefore aimed at comparing the accuracy and predictive value of MESS and PSI in lower limb salvage and amputation following trauma in National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala (NOHD), Kano. Methodology: Twenty-three individuals with mangled extremity participated in this hospital-based one-year prospective, interventional study. Socio-demographic data of participants were collected and recorded as well as the severity of the injury at the time of initial presentation using both MESS and PSI by the researcher while the Consulting surgeons went ahead to make their decision as per their clinical routine without any influence from the researcher. Results: Findings of the study showed that MESS has a high sensitivity score of 89% and a low to medium specificity score of 43.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 47.1% while PSI had a high specificity with low to medium sensitivity scores of 81.25% and 55% respectively with a PPV of 62.50%. Conclusion: The result of this study showed that MESS had high sensitivity and low specificity than PSI which had higher specificity and lower sensitivity than MESS in predicting amputation and limb salvage in patients with mangled lower extremity injuries. It is, therefore, recommended that surgeons should use both tools in decision making of limb salvage and amputation for optimal outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自达拉卡诺国立骨科医院的MESS和PSI在创伤后下肢截肢诊断准确性的比较评估
背景:残缺肢体严重程度评分(MESS)和预测性残缺指数(PSI)是评估创伤肢体截肢或残缺的两种常用诊断工具。然而,关于这些工具的准确性,缺乏当地的数据。目的:本研究旨在比较在卡诺州达拉国立骨科医院(NOHD), MESS和PSI在创伤后下肢保留和截肢中的准确性和预测价值。方法:23名肢体残废患者参与了这项以医院为基础的为期一年的前瞻性干预性研究。研究人员使用MESS和PSI收集并记录了参与者的社会人口统计数据,以及初次呈现时的损伤严重程度,而咨询外科医生则根据他们的临床常规继续做出决定,而不受研究人员的任何影响。结果:本研究结果显示,MESS的高敏感性评分为89%,中低特异性评分为43.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为47.1%;PSI的高特异性评分为81.25%,中低敏感性评分为55%,阳性预测值为62.50%。结论:本研究结果表明,在预测断肢损伤患者的截肢和残肢保留方面,MESS的敏感性高于PSI,特异性较低;PSI的特异性高于MESS,敏感性较MESS低。因此,建议外科医生在决定保留肢体和截肢时同时使用这两种工具以获得最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Function Using Tissue Doppler-Derived Tricuspid Lateral Annular Systolic Velocity (S`) Among HIV Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) And Its Relationship with CD4 Cell Count and Viral Load Spondylocostal Dysostosis: Mild variant in a Nigerian Newborn A Huge Submucosal Fibroid Polyps; A Hidden Cause of Necroturia Unusual sequelae of persistent digit sucking Habit Facial Hyperkeratosis/Hyperpigmentation Health Issues of Nigerian Muslim Pilgrims in The Immediate Post Covid-19 Era Hajj Year 2022 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1