Accounting for Pension Obligations in the European Union: A Case Study for EPSAS and Transnational Budgetary Supervision

Q3 Social Sciences Social Security Bulletin Pub Date : 2016-05-27 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2785725
Y. Biondi, M. Sierra
{"title":"Accounting for Pension Obligations in the European Union: A Case Study for EPSAS and Transnational Budgetary Supervision","authors":"Y. Biondi, M. Sierra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2785725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pension obligations constitute a critical issue for public finances and budgets. This is especially true for the European Union whose institutional mechanism aims to supervise Member States’ spending through centralised budgetary rules based upon financial covenants. In this context, accounting methods of recognition and measurement of pension obligations become an integral and critical aspect of Europe’s transnational budgetary and financial supervision. Drawing upon a comprehensive overview of pension management and regulation, this article aims to analyse the ongoing debate on accounting for pension obligations with a specific attention to the harmonization of European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS). While the European Commission has been favouring the ‘indisputable reference’ to the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), European Member States’ practices and views remain inconsistent with the normative solution imposed by the IPSAS 25, which favours and facilitates Definite Contribution pension schemes. In this context, we do summarise the IPSAS position mimicking the IFRS, review the pension’s accounting in national statistics and EPSAS debate, and provide some building blocks for a comprehensive model of accounting for pension obligations that admits and enables several viable modes of pension management.","PeriodicalId":39542,"journal":{"name":"Social Security Bulletin","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Security Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2785725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pension obligations constitute a critical issue for public finances and budgets. This is especially true for the European Union whose institutional mechanism aims to supervise Member States’ spending through centralised budgetary rules based upon financial covenants. In this context, accounting methods of recognition and measurement of pension obligations become an integral and critical aspect of Europe’s transnational budgetary and financial supervision. Drawing upon a comprehensive overview of pension management and regulation, this article aims to analyse the ongoing debate on accounting for pension obligations with a specific attention to the harmonization of European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS). While the European Commission has been favouring the ‘indisputable reference’ to the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), European Member States’ practices and views remain inconsistent with the normative solution imposed by the IPSAS 25, which favours and facilitates Definite Contribution pension schemes. In this context, we do summarise the IPSAS position mimicking the IFRS, review the pension’s accounting in national statistics and EPSAS debate, and provide some building blocks for a comprehensive model of accounting for pension obligations that admits and enables several viable modes of pension management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲联盟养恤金义务的会计核算:EPSAS和跨国预算监督的个案研究
养恤金义务是公共财政和预算的一个关键问题。对于欧洲联盟来说尤其如此,其体制机制旨在通过基于财政盟约的集中预算规则来监督成员国的支出。在这种情况下,确认和衡量养恤金义务的会计方法成为欧洲跨国预算和金融监督的一个不可或缺的关键方面。根据对养老金管理和监管的全面概述,本文旨在分析正在进行的关于养老金义务会计的辩论,特别关注欧洲公共部门会计准则(EPSAS)的协调。虽然欧盟委员会一直倾向于国际公共部门会计准则(IPSAS)的“无可争议的参考”,但欧洲成员国的做法和观点仍然与IPSAS 25施加的规范性解决方案不一致,IPSAS 25支持并促进了确定缴款养老金计划。在此背景下,我们总结了国际公共部门会计准则模仿国际财务报告准则的立场,回顾了国家统计和公共部门会计准则辩论中的养老金会计,并提供了一些构建模块,以建立一个全面的养老金义务会计模型,该模型承认并实现了几种可行的养老金管理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Security Bulletin
Social Security Bulletin Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Present Principles Industrial Life Assurance Widows', Orphans' and Old Age Pensions Finance of the Social Services National Health Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1