Practical aspects of insulin administration: what the healthcare provider knows

Nousheen Parker, A. Coetzee, L. van Wyk, M. Conradie
{"title":"Practical aspects of insulin administration: what the healthcare provider knows","authors":"Nousheen Parker, A. Coetzee, L. van Wyk, M. Conradie","doi":"10.1080/16089677.2022.2057692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME), a prerequisite for diabetes care, is mostly unstructured and inaccessible in the public health sector in South Africa (SA). Patient education is often delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) with limited time and proficiency, resulting in preventable errors with insulin administration. A study was undertaken to assess the knowledge of HCPs on the practical aspects of insulin administration and it was hypothesised that their expertise was insufficient. The unmet needs of DSME often transpire when preventable errors with insulin administration become clinically evident at higher levels of care. Methods: A prospective, descriptive study of HCPs’ knowledge before and after attending a ‘Diabetes 101’ workshop was performed. Four workshops at Tygerberg Hospital (TH) and Worcester Provincial Hospital (WPH) were assessed between 2016 and 2019. A total of 146 participants completed a questionnaire before and after the workshops. Knowledge was scored on the correct responses per question and overall. The mean pre- and post-test scores were compared using two sample t-tests. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences between pre- and post-training responses. Results: Of 146 participants, the majority were medical doctors (n = 116; 80%), mostly junior (n = 75; 65%) with 21% nursing practitioners. Before training there were significant deficiencies identified with only 3 of the 19 question items answered correctly by more than 50% of HCPs. The greatest knowledge deficits were with regard to insulin re-suspension and the injection technique and priming of the insulin pen. Following training there was a significant improvement between the pre-test mean percentage score of 36.0% (15) and post-test mean percentage score of 68% (16) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Knowledge on the practical aspects of insulin administration is insufficient amongst HCPs but improved after structured education. Further research is needed to assess the long-term retention of knowledge and the impact of knowledge translation into clinical care.","PeriodicalId":43919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","volume":"28 1","pages":"100 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2022.2057692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME), a prerequisite for diabetes care, is mostly unstructured and inaccessible in the public health sector in South Africa (SA). Patient education is often delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) with limited time and proficiency, resulting in preventable errors with insulin administration. A study was undertaken to assess the knowledge of HCPs on the practical aspects of insulin administration and it was hypothesised that their expertise was insufficient. The unmet needs of DSME often transpire when preventable errors with insulin administration become clinically evident at higher levels of care. Methods: A prospective, descriptive study of HCPs’ knowledge before and after attending a ‘Diabetes 101’ workshop was performed. Four workshops at Tygerberg Hospital (TH) and Worcester Provincial Hospital (WPH) were assessed between 2016 and 2019. A total of 146 participants completed a questionnaire before and after the workshops. Knowledge was scored on the correct responses per question and overall. The mean pre- and post-test scores were compared using two sample t-tests. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences between pre- and post-training responses. Results: Of 146 participants, the majority were medical doctors (n = 116; 80%), mostly junior (n = 75; 65%) with 21% nursing practitioners. Before training there were significant deficiencies identified with only 3 of the 19 question items answered correctly by more than 50% of HCPs. The greatest knowledge deficits were with regard to insulin re-suspension and the injection technique and priming of the insulin pen. Following training there was a significant improvement between the pre-test mean percentage score of 36.0% (15) and post-test mean percentage score of 68% (16) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Knowledge on the practical aspects of insulin administration is insufficient amongst HCPs but improved after structured education. Further research is needed to assess the long-term retention of knowledge and the impact of knowledge translation into clinical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰岛素管理的实际方面:什么医疗保健提供者知道
背景:糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)是糖尿病护理的先决条件,但在南非(SA)的公共卫生部门,这种教育大多是非结构化的,而且难以获得。患者教育通常由医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)提供,时间和熟练程度有限,导致胰岛素给药的可预防错误。进行了一项研究,以评估医务人员在胰岛素给药的实际方面的知识,并假设他们的专业知识不足。当胰岛素给药的可预防错误在更高水平的护理中成为临床明显时,DSME的未满足需求经常发生。方法:对HCPs参加“糖尿病101”研讨会前后的知识进行前瞻性描述性研究。2016年至2019年期间,对泰格伯格医院(TH)和伍斯特省医院(WPH)的四个讲习班进行了评估。共有146名参与者在研讨会前后完成了问卷调查。知识是根据每个问题和整体的正确回答来评分的。使用两个样本t检验比较测试前和测试后的平均得分。卡方检验用于分析训练前和训练后反应的差异。结果:146名参与者中,大多数是医生(n = 116;80%),多数为晚辈(n = 75;65%), 21%为护理从业人员。在培训之前,发现了重大缺陷,超过50%的医护人员正确回答了19个问题中的3个。最大的知识缺陷是关于胰岛素再悬浮和注射技术和胰岛素笔的启动。训练后,测试前平均百分比得分为36.0%(15),测试后平均百分比得分为68%(16),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:HCPs对胰岛素给药实践方面的认识不足,但经过有组织的教育后有所改善。需要进一步的研究来评估知识的长期保留和知识转化为临床护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Cardiorenal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors: who might benefit? MRI brain findings in patients with depression and type 2 diabetes – a scoping review Tobacco use in diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of snuff tobacco use on diabetes mellitus complications over a period of nine years Effect of an educational intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour in type 2 diabetic patients at a foot and eye care practice Relevance and therapeutic implication of macroprolactinemia detection using PEG 6000 in women of childbearing age with hyperprolactinemia: experience at a tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1