What types of cultural cooperation exist in European cross-border areas?

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1080/04353684.2021.2015245
F. Durand
{"title":"What types of cultural cooperation exist in European cross-border areas?","authors":"F. Durand","doi":"10.1080/04353684.2021.2015245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 1992, culture has been an official competence of the European Union. De facto, the EU has the legitimacy and means to intervene and change collective representations and social dynamics, including in border regions, in order to bring people together and build a Europe ‘united in diversity’. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the cross-border dynamics in cultural matters, and to examine the realization of cultural projects as a driving force in the process of cross-border integration. The approach is based on a spatial analysis of the cultural projects co-financed by Interreg over the 2000–2020 period, enabling to provide an overview of the cross-border cultural initiatives undertaken. The results reveal first that strong spatial disparities exist between programming spaces in terms of cultural investment. Second, that cross-border cultural cooperation mainly involves municipalities, and not primarily cultural actors. Third, although a diverse range of cultural projects have been developed over the last twenty years, the emphasis has been more on tourism projects. These achievements bring into question the role of Interreg programming in cultural matters in the dynamics of cross-border integration, since it fosters an economic approach to culture at the expense of social and identity issues.","PeriodicalId":47542,"journal":{"name":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","volume":"70 1","pages":"307 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.2015245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 1992, culture has been an official competence of the European Union. De facto, the EU has the legitimacy and means to intervene and change collective representations and social dynamics, including in border regions, in order to bring people together and build a Europe ‘united in diversity’. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the cross-border dynamics in cultural matters, and to examine the realization of cultural projects as a driving force in the process of cross-border integration. The approach is based on a spatial analysis of the cultural projects co-financed by Interreg over the 2000–2020 period, enabling to provide an overview of the cross-border cultural initiatives undertaken. The results reveal first that strong spatial disparities exist between programming spaces in terms of cultural investment. Second, that cross-border cultural cooperation mainly involves municipalities, and not primarily cultural actors. Third, although a diverse range of cultural projects have been developed over the last twenty years, the emphasis has been more on tourism projects. These achievements bring into question the role of Interreg programming in cultural matters in the dynamics of cross-border integration, since it fosters an economic approach to culture at the expense of social and identity issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲跨境地区存在哪些类型的文化合作?
自1992年以来,文化一直是欧盟的官方职权范围。事实上,欧盟拥有干预和改变集体代表和社会动态的合法性和手段,包括在边境地区,以将人们聚集在一起,建立一个“多样性团结”的欧洲。本文的目的是研究文化事务的跨境动态,并考察文化项目的实现在跨境融合过程中的驱动作用。该方法基于对Interreg在2000-2020年期间共同资助的文化项目的空间分析,从而提供了所开展的跨境文化倡议的概述。研究结果表明,城市规划空间在文化投资方面存在较大的空间差异。第二,跨境文化合作的主体主要是城市,而非文化主体。第三,虽然在过去的二十年里发展了各种各样的文化项目,但重点更多地放在旅游项目上。这些成就使人们对跨国界一体化动态中文化事务的跨区域规划的作用产生疑问,因为它以牺牲社会和身份问题为代价,促进了对文化的经济处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Geografiska Annaler, Series B, is a prestigious international journal publishing articles covering all theoretical and empirical aspects of human and economic geography. The journal has no specific regional profile but some attention is paid to research from the Nordic countries, as well as from countries around the Baltic Sea. Geografiska Annaler, Series B is supported by the Swedish Council for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences.
期刊最新文献
The four dimensions of metropolitanization: a case study of Warsaw, Wrocław and Lublin Legitimizing a world-class hospital: policy mobility and narratives in megaproject planning Weight, relief and overcoming: a safe space for racialized women learning to swim in Sweden Public transport provision and social sustainability in Sweden Austerity through rescaling and layering in the Swedish welfare state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1