Evaluation of inhaler use technique in a pediatric appointment

J. Ribeiro, Carolina dos Santos Folques Alves, M. M. Zarcos
{"title":"Evaluation of inhaler use technique in a pediatric appointment","authors":"J. Ribeiro, Carolina dos Santos Folques Alves, M. M. Zarcos","doi":"10.7199/ped.oncall.2022.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Inhalers are recommended for asthma prophylactic and crisis therapy. In order to have a good deposition of drugs at pulmonary tissue, the correct use of the devices is necessary. Objective: To verify the inhaler use technique with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) with spacers and dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) in a pediatric sample (ages between 1 and 17 years old). Material and Methods: Descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study. Application of a checklist that included the steps of the correct inhaler use technique, which was performed under physician observation, and other questions related to the use of the devices. Results: We observed a total of 83 inhaler use techniques: 46 pMDIs with spacers and 37 DPIs. About 54% of pMDIs with spacers users and 27% of DPIs users performed the inhaler use technique correctly, p=0.012. The most frequent mistakes in pMDIs with spacers users were: 50% didn’t waste the first puff, 17.4% didn’t shake the device prior to use and 28.3% didn’t wait between inhalations. The mistakes observed in DPIs users were: 43.2% didn’t perform a forced expiration before inhaler use, 13.5% didn’t start with a forced inspiration, 24.3% didn’t pause at the end of inspiration, 32.4% didn’t exhale slowly and 35.1% didn ́t wait between inhalations. Conclusion: Multiple mistakes were observed even in the users who had been followed up for several years. The most frequent mistakes occurred in DPIs users. Thus, the inhaler use technique must always be observed by the physician in all appointments, especially in users of DPIs in which the correct use depends on their autonomy. Introduction Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and is characterized by a chronic airway inflammation.1 It’s a global health problem and its prevalence is increasing.1 Treatment goals are to achieve symptoms control, maintain normal activity levels and minimize risk of exacerbations or sequelae.1 Inhalation is the recommended route for both exacerbations and prophylactic therapy.1,2 There is a wide variety of devices available on the market with different inhaler use technique.3 The selection of the right inhaler must take into consideration the age of the child, inspiratory capacity and collaborative ability.1,4 It is very important that inhaled particles deposit in the lungs, and the only way to achieve it is with a correct inhaler use technique.5 The correct use of devices is associated with the control of asthma.2,4,6 The incorrect use is associated with exacerbations, more use of systemic corticosteroids, more visits to the hospital, absences from school, reduction and limitation of sports activities.5 The aims of this study were to characterize and verify the inhaler use technique with pressurized metereddose inhalers (pMDIs) with spacers and dry-powder inhalers (DPIs). Methods & Materials Descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study. We included all children (between 1 and 17 years old) who used inhaled therapy and were followed up in a pediatric appointment of our hospital, after their caregivers’ consent. The duration period of the study was 2 months (October and November 2018). We observed the inhaler use technique using sample devices during pediatric consultation. We used a checklist, literature-based>sup>3,4, to verify if all steps were correctly performed. To define a correct technique, we considered all the steps listed in table 1 and 3, except the waste of the first puff in pMDIs. Afterwards we made additional questions to the child and caregiver about issues related to the use of pMDIs with spacers and DPIs. The statistical analysis performed, using SPSS 22®, was descriptive and bivariate, we used Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test (α = 0.05). Address for Correspondance: Joana Cleto Duarte da Costa Ribeiro, Rua da Figueira, no38, Ericeira. 2655431 Ericeira. Portugal. Email: joana-ribeiro@campus.ul.pt ©2021 Pediatric Oncall ARTICLE HISTORY Received 30 September 2021 Accepted 29 November 2021","PeriodicalId":19949,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Oncall","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Oncall","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7199/ped.oncall.2022.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inhalers are recommended for asthma prophylactic and crisis therapy. In order to have a good deposition of drugs at pulmonary tissue, the correct use of the devices is necessary. Objective: To verify the inhaler use technique with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) with spacers and dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) in a pediatric sample (ages between 1 and 17 years old). Material and Methods: Descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study. Application of a checklist that included the steps of the correct inhaler use technique, which was performed under physician observation, and other questions related to the use of the devices. Results: We observed a total of 83 inhaler use techniques: 46 pMDIs with spacers and 37 DPIs. About 54% of pMDIs with spacers users and 27% of DPIs users performed the inhaler use technique correctly, p=0.012. The most frequent mistakes in pMDIs with spacers users were: 50% didn’t waste the first puff, 17.4% didn’t shake the device prior to use and 28.3% didn’t wait between inhalations. The mistakes observed in DPIs users were: 43.2% didn’t perform a forced expiration before inhaler use, 13.5% didn’t start with a forced inspiration, 24.3% didn’t pause at the end of inspiration, 32.4% didn’t exhale slowly and 35.1% didn ́t wait between inhalations. Conclusion: Multiple mistakes were observed even in the users who had been followed up for several years. The most frequent mistakes occurred in DPIs users. Thus, the inhaler use technique must always be observed by the physician in all appointments, especially in users of DPIs in which the correct use depends on their autonomy. Introduction Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and is characterized by a chronic airway inflammation.1 It’s a global health problem and its prevalence is increasing.1 Treatment goals are to achieve symptoms control, maintain normal activity levels and minimize risk of exacerbations or sequelae.1 Inhalation is the recommended route for both exacerbations and prophylactic therapy.1,2 There is a wide variety of devices available on the market with different inhaler use technique.3 The selection of the right inhaler must take into consideration the age of the child, inspiratory capacity and collaborative ability.1,4 It is very important that inhaled particles deposit in the lungs, and the only way to achieve it is with a correct inhaler use technique.5 The correct use of devices is associated with the control of asthma.2,4,6 The incorrect use is associated with exacerbations, more use of systemic corticosteroids, more visits to the hospital, absences from school, reduction and limitation of sports activities.5 The aims of this study were to characterize and verify the inhaler use technique with pressurized metereddose inhalers (pMDIs) with spacers and dry-powder inhalers (DPIs). Methods & Materials Descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study. We included all children (between 1 and 17 years old) who used inhaled therapy and were followed up in a pediatric appointment of our hospital, after their caregivers’ consent. The duration period of the study was 2 months (October and November 2018). We observed the inhaler use technique using sample devices during pediatric consultation. We used a checklist, literature-based>sup>3,4, to verify if all steps were correctly performed. To define a correct technique, we considered all the steps listed in table 1 and 3, except the waste of the first puff in pMDIs. Afterwards we made additional questions to the child and caregiver about issues related to the use of pMDIs with spacers and DPIs. The statistical analysis performed, using SPSS 22®, was descriptive and bivariate, we used Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test (α = 0.05). Address for Correspondance: Joana Cleto Duarte da Costa Ribeiro, Rua da Figueira, no38, Ericeira. 2655431 Ericeira. Portugal. Email: joana-ribeiro@campus.ul.pt ©2021 Pediatric Oncall ARTICLE HISTORY Received 30 September 2021 Accepted 29 November 2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估吸入器使用技术在儿科预约
简介:吸入器被推荐用于哮喘预防和危象治疗。为了使药物在肺组织有良好的沉积,正确使用器械是必要的。目的:在1 - 17岁的儿童样本中验证带间隔的加压计量吸入器(pmdi)和干粉吸入器(DPIs)的吸入器使用技术。材料和方法:描述性、观察性和横断面研究。应用清单,其中包括在医生观察下正确使用吸入器的步骤,以及与设备使用有关的其他问题。结果:我们共观察了83种吸入器使用技术:46种pmdi与间隔器和37种dpi。54%使用间隔器的pmdi和27%使用dpi的pmdi正确使用了吸入器技术,p=0.012。在使用间隔器的pmdi患者中,最常见的错误是:50%的人没有浪费第一口烟,17.4%的人在使用前没有摇晃设备,28.3%的人在两次吸入之间没有等待。在dpi使用者中观察到的错误是:43.2%的人在使用吸入器前没有进行强制呼气,13.5%的人没有从强制吸气开始,24.3%的人在吸气结束时没有暂停,32.4%的人没有缓慢呼气,35.1%的人没有在吸气之间等待。结论:即使在随访数年的使用者中也存在多种错误。最常见的错误发生在dpi用户中。因此,在所有预约中,医生必须始终观察吸入器使用技术,特别是在dpi使用者中,正确使用取决于他们的自主性。哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性疾病,以慢性气道炎症为特征这是一个全球性的健康问题,而且发病率正在上升治疗目标是实现症状控制,维持正常活动水平,并尽量减少恶化或后遗症的风险吸入是加重和预防性治疗的推荐途径。市场上有多种不同的吸入器使用技术正确吸入器的选择必须考虑儿童的年龄、吸气能力和协作能力。吸入的微粒在肺部沉积是非常重要的,实现这一目标的唯一途径是正确使用吸入器技术设备的正确使用与哮喘的控制有关。2,4,6不正确的使用与病情加重、更多地使用全身性皮质类固醇、更多地去医院、缺课、减少和限制体育活动有关本研究的目的是表征和验证带间隔的加压计量吸入器(pmdi)和干粉吸入器(dpi)的吸入器使用技术。方法与材料描述性、观察性和横断面研究。我们纳入了所有使用吸入疗法的儿童(1至17岁),并在其护理人员同意后在我们医院的儿科预约进行随访。研究持续时间为2个月(2018年10月和11月)。我们观察吸入器使用技术使用样品装置在儿科会诊。我们使用了一个检查表(基于文献>sup>3,4)来验证所有步骤是否正确执行。为了定义一种正确的技术,我们考虑了表1和3中列出的所有步骤,除了pmdi中第一次吞吐的浪费。之后,我们向儿童和护理人员提出了关于使用pmdi与间隔器和dpi相关的问题。使用SPSS 22®进行描述性和双变量统计分析,我们使用卡方检验和Fisher确切检验(α = 0.05)。通信地址:Joana Cleto Duarte da Costa Ribeiro, Rua da Figueira, 38号,Ericeira. 2655431 Ericeira。葡萄牙。电子邮件:joana-ribeiro@campus.ul.pt©2021 Pediatric Oncall文章历史2021年9月30日收到2021年11月29日接受
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Camptodactyly Arthropathy Coxa Vara Pericarditis Syndrome: a mimicker of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis- Zebra amongst Horses Pediatric multi-systemic inflammatory syndrome complicated by severe cardiac and renal involvement Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 positive mothers and their newborns - a retrospective study Short-term interventions in health cooperation programs: volunteers and local healthcare professionals perspective Aberrant vasculature in the Liver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1