{"title":"Cosmogenic nuclide weathering biases: corrections and potential for denudation and weathering rate measurements","authors":"Richard F. Ott, S. Gallen, D. Granger","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-455-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Cosmogenic radionuclides (CRNs) are the standard tool to derive\ncentennial-to-millennial timescale denudation rates; however, it has been\ndemonstrated that chemical weathering in some settings can bias CRNs as a\nproxy for landscape denudation. Currently, studies investigating CRN\nweathering biases have mostly focused on the largely insoluble target\nmineral quartz in felsic lithologies. Here, we examine the response of CRN\nbuild-up for both soluble and insoluble target minerals under different\nweathering scenarios. We assume a simple box model in which bedrock is\nconverted to a well-mixed regolith at a constant rate, and denudation occurs by regolith erosion and weathering either in the regolith or along the regolith–bedrock interface, as is common in carbonate bedrock. We show that weathering along the regolith–bedrock interface increases CRN concentrations compared to a no-weathering case and how independently derived weathering rates or degrees can be used to correct for this bias. If weathering is concentrated within the regolith, insoluble target minerals will have a longer regolith residence time and higher nuclide concentration than soluble\ntarget minerals. This bias can be identified and corrected using paired-nuclide measurements of minerals with different solubility coupled with\nknowledge of either the bedrock or regolith mineralogy to derive denudation\nand long-term weathering rates. Similarly, single-nuclide measurements on\nsoluble or insoluble minerals can be corrected to determine denudation rates if a weathering rate and compositional data are available. Our model\nhighlights that for soluble target minerals, the relationship between\nnuclide accumulation and denudation is not monotonic. We use this\nunderstanding to map the conditions of regolith mass, weathering, and\ndenudation rates at which weathering corrections for cosmogenic nuclides\nbecome large and ambiguous, as well as identify environments in which the\nbias is mostly negligible and CRN concentrations reliably reflect landscape denudation. We highlight how measurements of CRNs from soluble target minerals, coupled with bedrock and regolith mineralogy, can help to expand the range of landscapes for which centennial-to-millennial timescale\ndenudation and weathering rates can be obtained.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-455-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Abstract. Cosmogenic radionuclides (CRNs) are the standard tool to derive
centennial-to-millennial timescale denudation rates; however, it has been
demonstrated that chemical weathering in some settings can bias CRNs as a
proxy for landscape denudation. Currently, studies investigating CRN
weathering biases have mostly focused on the largely insoluble target
mineral quartz in felsic lithologies. Here, we examine the response of CRN
build-up for both soluble and insoluble target minerals under different
weathering scenarios. We assume a simple box model in which bedrock is
converted to a well-mixed regolith at a constant rate, and denudation occurs by regolith erosion and weathering either in the regolith or along the regolith–bedrock interface, as is common in carbonate bedrock. We show that weathering along the regolith–bedrock interface increases CRN concentrations compared to a no-weathering case and how independently derived weathering rates or degrees can be used to correct for this bias. If weathering is concentrated within the regolith, insoluble target minerals will have a longer regolith residence time and higher nuclide concentration than soluble
target minerals. This bias can be identified and corrected using paired-nuclide measurements of minerals with different solubility coupled with
knowledge of either the bedrock or regolith mineralogy to derive denudation
and long-term weathering rates. Similarly, single-nuclide measurements on
soluble or insoluble minerals can be corrected to determine denudation rates if a weathering rate and compositional data are available. Our model
highlights that for soluble target minerals, the relationship between
nuclide accumulation and denudation is not monotonic. We use this
understanding to map the conditions of regolith mass, weathering, and
denudation rates at which weathering corrections for cosmogenic nuclides
become large and ambiguous, as well as identify environments in which the
bias is mostly negligible and CRN concentrations reliably reflect landscape denudation. We highlight how measurements of CRNs from soluble target minerals, coupled with bedrock and regolith mineralogy, can help to expand the range of landscapes for which centennial-to-millennial timescale
denudation and weathering rates can be obtained.