Phenotypic Distribution of Serine- and Zinc-Type Carbapenemases Among Clinical Bacterial Isolates in a Tertiary Hospital in Benin, Nigeria

Ephraim Ehidiamen Ibadin, Angela Eghiomon, N. Idemudia, N. A. Anogie, Richard E. Eriamiatoe, Eghonghon I. Dedekumah, Obiorah D. Aguh, I. Igbarumah, R. Omoregie
{"title":"Phenotypic Distribution of Serine- and Zinc-Type Carbapenemases Among Clinical Bacterial Isolates in a Tertiary Hospital in Benin, Nigeria","authors":"Ephraim Ehidiamen Ibadin, Angela Eghiomon, N. Idemudia, N. A. Anogie, Richard E. Eriamiatoe, Eghonghon I. Dedekumah, Obiorah D. Aguh, I. Igbarumah, R. Omoregie","doi":"10.34172/ijep.2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Serine and zinc type carbapenemases are distributed in many genera of bacteria and are typically associated with specific regions or countries. Objectives: This study phenotypically determined the prevalence of serine and zinc-type carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacilli recovered from clinical specimens in Benin, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: Totally, 158 consecutive non-duplicate bacterial isolates (gram-negative bacilli) recovered from clinical samples were screened for serine and zinc-type carbapenemases using the simplified carbapenemase inactivation (sCIM) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid -double-disc synergy test methods. Results: The isolates recovered from clinical specimens included 126 Enterobacteriaceae (79.7%), 7 Acinetobacter spp (3.7%), and 28oxidase positive gram negative bacilli (17.7%). Twenty-eight isolates (17.7%) out of the 158 tested samples were carbapenemase positive. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of serine- and zinc-type carbapenemases (P=0.0748). However, the prevalence of zinc-type carbapenemase was significantly higher in Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared with other isolates (P=0.0028) while that of serinetype carbapenemase was not affected by the type of clinical isolates (P=0.7216). Finally, the prevalence of both serine- and zinc-type carbapenemases were not affected (P>0.05) by clinical specimens and the source of isolates (in-patient vs. out-patient) respectively. Conclusion: In general, the prevalence of zinc-type (12%) carbapenemases was insignificantly higher than that of serine-type (5.7%) carbapenemases. The measures to reduce infections caused by carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) are advocated accordingly.","PeriodicalId":31016,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Enteric Pathogens","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Enteric Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijep.2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Serine and zinc type carbapenemases are distributed in many genera of bacteria and are typically associated with specific regions or countries. Objectives: This study phenotypically determined the prevalence of serine and zinc-type carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacilli recovered from clinical specimens in Benin, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: Totally, 158 consecutive non-duplicate bacterial isolates (gram-negative bacilli) recovered from clinical samples were screened for serine and zinc-type carbapenemases using the simplified carbapenemase inactivation (sCIM) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid -double-disc synergy test methods. Results: The isolates recovered from clinical specimens included 126 Enterobacteriaceae (79.7%), 7 Acinetobacter spp (3.7%), and 28oxidase positive gram negative bacilli (17.7%). Twenty-eight isolates (17.7%) out of the 158 tested samples were carbapenemase positive. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of serine- and zinc-type carbapenemases (P=0.0748). However, the prevalence of zinc-type carbapenemase was significantly higher in Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared with other isolates (P=0.0028) while that of serinetype carbapenemase was not affected by the type of clinical isolates (P=0.7216). Finally, the prevalence of both serine- and zinc-type carbapenemases were not affected (P>0.05) by clinical specimens and the source of isolates (in-patient vs. out-patient) respectively. Conclusion: In general, the prevalence of zinc-type (12%) carbapenemases was insignificantly higher than that of serine-type (5.7%) carbapenemases. The measures to reduce infections caused by carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) are advocated accordingly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚贝宁某三级医院临床分离细菌中丝氨酸型和锌型碳青霉烯酶的表型分布
背景:丝氨酸型和锌型碳青霉烯酶分布在许多属的细菌中,通常与特定的地区或国家有关。目的:本研究表型测定了从尼日利亚贝宁临床标本中回收的革兰氏阴性杆菌中丝氨酸和锌型碳青霉烯酶的患病率。材料与方法:采用简化碳青霉烯酶失活(sCIM)法和乙二胺四乙酸-双盘协同试验法,对158株临床样品中连续分离的革兰氏阴性杆菌(革兰氏阴性杆菌)进行丝氨酸和锌型碳青霉烯酶筛选。结果:从临床标本中分离出肠杆菌科126株(79.7%)、不动杆菌7株(3.7%)和28氧化酶阳性革兰氏阴性杆菌(17.7%)。158份检测样品中碳青霉烯酶阳性28株(17.7%)。丝氨酸型和锌型碳青霉烯酶的患病率差异无统计学意义(P=0.0748)。铜绿假单胞菌中锌型碳青霉烯酶的阳性率明显高于其他菌株(P=0.0028),丝氨酸型碳青霉烯酶的阳性率不受临床分离菌株类型的影响(P=0.7216)。最后,丝氨酸型和锌型碳青霉烯酶的流行率不受临床标本和分离源(住院和门诊)的影响(P>0.05)。结论:总体而言,锌型碳青霉烯酶的患病率(12%)低于丝氨酸型碳青霉烯酶的患病率(5.7%)。建议采取相应措施减少碳青霉烯酶产生菌(CPOs)引起的感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of the Effect of Sophora alopecuroides Plant Extract on Trichomonas vaginalis Parasite In Vitro Growth Inhibitory Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Bifidobacterium bifidum Supernatant on Blastocystis Subtypes 1 and 3 Via the TLR4 Axis Frequency, Associated Factors, Clinical Symptoms, and Subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Healthy Individuals: A Case-Control Study Shining a Light on Metal and Nonmetal Biomaterials in Colorectal Cancer Therapy: Illuminating New Frontiers An Introduction to the 4th National Congress of Clinical Case Reports (Karaj, Iran)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1