Admission blood glucose as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute myocardial infarction

R. Russel, R. Ranjith, B. Sartorius
{"title":"Admission blood glucose as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute myocardial infarction","authors":"R. Russel, R. Ranjith, B. Sartorius","doi":"10.24170/16-2-3641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the utility of admission blood glucose for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalisation and 6 months’ postdischarge in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods and results: This study recruited 2878 AMI patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit at R. K. Khan Hospital, Durban, South Africa, from 2002 - 2014. Demographic and clinical data stored in an electronic database were obtained from all patients. Admission blood glucose levels were sub-divided into 3 groups; low (<7.8), medium (7.8-10.9) and high (≥11) mmol/l. The mean age of the study population was 57.18 ± 7 years of whom 65% were males. Self-reported diabetes was found in 59%, while 377 patients were diagnosed with diabetes based on HbA1c levels ≥6.5%, increasing the overall prevalence to 72% (n=2070). More patients were in the low admission blood glucose group (49%), medium group (16%), and high group (35%). The highest prevalence of MACE was seen in the high group (42%) compared to either the medium (39%) or low groups (26%; p<0.001), particularly for cardiogenic shock (p<0.001), cardiac failure (p<0.001) and death (p<0.001). Following multivariable logistic regression analyses of clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality, high admission blood glucose conferred a significantly increased odds of mortality (p=0.001). The optimal cut-off admission blood glucose value as determined via the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting in hospital and 6 months’ mortality was 8.5mmol/l (AUC of 0.63) and 8.1mmol/l (AUC of 0.61) for MACE. Conclusions: This study shows that patients have multiple risk factors for AMI with diabetes playing a central role. Although elevated admission blood glucose is an important predictor for in hospital and shortterm MACE, the cut-off value for predicting MACE and mortality has only modest predictability and further research is required to improve the performance of these measures for routine clinical use.","PeriodicalId":55781,"journal":{"name":"SA Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24170/16-2-3641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the utility of admission blood glucose for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalisation and 6 months’ postdischarge in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods and results: This study recruited 2878 AMI patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit at R. K. Khan Hospital, Durban, South Africa, from 2002 - 2014. Demographic and clinical data stored in an electronic database were obtained from all patients. Admission blood glucose levels were sub-divided into 3 groups; low (<7.8), medium (7.8-10.9) and high (≥11) mmol/l. The mean age of the study population was 57.18 ± 7 years of whom 65% were males. Self-reported diabetes was found in 59%, while 377 patients were diagnosed with diabetes based on HbA1c levels ≥6.5%, increasing the overall prevalence to 72% (n=2070). More patients were in the low admission blood glucose group (49%), medium group (16%), and high group (35%). The highest prevalence of MACE was seen in the high group (42%) compared to either the medium (39%) or low groups (26%; p<0.001), particularly for cardiogenic shock (p<0.001), cardiac failure (p<0.001) and death (p<0.001). Following multivariable logistic regression analyses of clinical and laboratory parameters associated with mortality, high admission blood glucose conferred a significantly increased odds of mortality (p=0.001). The optimal cut-off admission blood glucose value as determined via the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting in hospital and 6 months’ mortality was 8.5mmol/l (AUC of 0.63) and 8.1mmol/l (AUC of 0.61) for MACE. Conclusions: This study shows that patients have multiple risk factors for AMI with diabetes playing a central role. Although elevated admission blood glucose is an important predictor for in hospital and shortterm MACE, the cut-off value for predicting MACE and mortality has only modest predictability and further research is required to improve the performance of these measures for routine clinical use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入院血糖作为急性心肌梗死患者的预后指标
目的:探讨入院血糖对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院期间及出院后6个月主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的预测作用。方法和结果:本研究招募了2002 - 2014年在南非德班R. K. Khan医院冠状动脉监护室住院的2878例AMI患者。所有患者的人口学和临床数据存储在电子数据库中。入院血糖水平再分为3组;低(<7.8),中(7.8-10.9)和高(≥11)mmol/l。研究人群的平均年龄为57.18±7岁,其中65%为男性。59%的患者自我报告患有糖尿病,而377例患者根据HbA1c水平≥6.5%被诊断患有糖尿病,总患病率增加到72% (n=2070)。入院时低血糖组(49%)、中血糖组(16%)、高血糖组(35%)较多。MACE发生率最高的是高组(42%),而中等组(39%)或低组(26%;P <0.001),特别是心源性休克(P <0.001)、心力衰竭(P <0.001)和死亡(P <0.001)。在对与死亡率相关的临床和实验室参数进行多变量logistic回归分析后,入院时高血糖显著增加了死亡率(p=0.001)。通过受试者工作特征曲线预测住院和6个月死亡率的最佳入院血糖临界值为8.5mmol/l (AUC为0.63),MACE为8.1mmol/l (AUC为0.61)。结论:本研究表明AMI患者存在多种危险因素,糖尿病起核心作用。虽然入院血糖升高是住院和短期MACE的重要预测指标,但预测MACE和死亡率的临界值只有适度的可预测性,需要进一步研究以提高这些指标在常规临床应用中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Subclinical cardiovascular remodelling in HIV-infection: A multimodal case study of 2 serodiscordant, monozygotic twins. The pathophysiology of RHD and outstanding gaps Challenges of managing patients with mechanical heart valve thrombosis in pregnancy: A case series Why publish in the South African Heart Journal? Cardiovascular medicine in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1