Elder Agency: How Older New Zealanders Played Their Part in Aotearoa New Zealand’s COVID-19 Response

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Forum Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00664677.2022.2103517
Courtney Addison, J. Horan
{"title":"Elder Agency: How Older New Zealanders Played Their Part in Aotearoa New Zealand’s COVID-19 Response","authors":"Courtney Addison, J. Horan","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2022.2103517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At higher risk of both contracting COVID-19, and suffering ill effects from it, older people have figured prominently in accounts of the pandemic. In Aotearoa, government messaging enjoined the population to protect older people, who became the implicit subjects of the widely shared appeal to ‘stay home, save lives’. Drawing on interviews with 35 people aged 62 and older, we explore how older New Zealanders imagined their own risk, resilience, and relationships – and in doing so their membership in the imagined community of this island nation. While some of our participants did feel vulnerable to COVID-19 and adjusted their lifestyles accordingly, others felt strong and healthy even as they acknowledged that age was a risk factor that theoretically applied to them. Furthermore, many of the people we spoke to expressed concern for other members of society, asserting a form of agency through solidarity and recognition that went unacknowledged in the dominant social discourse about what it meant to be old in the context of COVID-19. Through these reflections, participants often directly considered how old age figured in political messaging around the pandemic, in some cases feeling cared for and recognised and in others feeling as if age itself had become a political tool. We argue that ‘older’ New Zealanders are a more diverse group than was acknowledged at the time and also a more agentive one, playing a critical contributing role in the pandemic response rather than merely acting as a rationale for public health measures.","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"34 1","pages":"287 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2103517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT At higher risk of both contracting COVID-19, and suffering ill effects from it, older people have figured prominently in accounts of the pandemic. In Aotearoa, government messaging enjoined the population to protect older people, who became the implicit subjects of the widely shared appeal to ‘stay home, save lives’. Drawing on interviews with 35 people aged 62 and older, we explore how older New Zealanders imagined their own risk, resilience, and relationships – and in doing so their membership in the imagined community of this island nation. While some of our participants did feel vulnerable to COVID-19 and adjusted their lifestyles accordingly, others felt strong and healthy even as they acknowledged that age was a risk factor that theoretically applied to them. Furthermore, many of the people we spoke to expressed concern for other members of society, asserting a form of agency through solidarity and recognition that went unacknowledged in the dominant social discourse about what it meant to be old in the context of COVID-19. Through these reflections, participants often directly considered how old age figured in political messaging around the pandemic, in some cases feeling cared for and recognised and in others feeling as if age itself had become a political tool. We argue that ‘older’ New Zealanders are a more diverse group than was acknowledged at the time and also a more agentive one, playing a critical contributing role in the pandemic response rather than merely acting as a rationale for public health measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人机构:新西兰老年人如何在新西兰应对COVID-19中发挥作用
老年人感染COVID-19的风险更高,并因此产生不良影响,他们在疫情报道中占据了重要地位。在奥特罗阿,政府的信息要求人们保护老年人,他们成为了广泛呼吁“待在家里,拯救生命”的隐含对象。通过对35位62岁及以上老人的采访,我们探讨了新西兰老年人如何想象自己的风险、韧性和人际关系——以及他们在这个岛国想象中的社区中的成员身份。虽然我们的一些参与者确实感到容易受到COVID-19的影响,并相应地调整了他们的生活方式,但其他人感到强壮和健康,即使他们承认年龄是理论上适用于他们的风险因素。此外,我们采访的许多人对社会其他成员表示关切,主张通过团结和认可来发挥某种形式的能人作用,而在COVID-19背景下,关于老年意味着什么,这在主流社会话语中没有得到承认。通过这些思考,与会者往往直接考虑老龄如何在围绕大流行的政治信息中发挥作用,在某些情况下,他们感到受到关心和认可,而在另一些情况下,他们感到年龄本身已成为一种政治工具。我们认为,“老年人”新西兰人是一个比当时所承认的更多样化的群体,也是一个更具能动性的群体,在大流行应对中发挥着关键的贡献作用,而不仅仅是作为公共卫生措施的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Forum
Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
期刊最新文献
Politics of Shared Humanity: On Hospitality, Equality and the Spiritual in Rural Gambia. Article 1F and Anthropological Evidence: A Fine Line Between Justice and Injustice? The Multiple Roles of Socio-Anthropological Expert Evidence in Indigenous Land Claims: The Xukuru People Case Pastors, Preaching and Parking Lot Conversations: Clergy’s Tactics of LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Mainline Protestant Churches Environments and Socialities in Oceania – Changing Ideas and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1