Evaluation of operating cost management models for selection cutting in Scandinavian continuous cover forestry

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.3832/ifor4204-016
S. Bianchi, A. Ahtikoski, Timo Muhonen, Eero Holmström, S. Valkonen, Y. Nuutinen, R. Picchio
{"title":"Evaluation of operating cost management models for selection cutting in Scandinavian continuous cover forestry","authors":"S. Bianchi, A. Ahtikoski, Timo Muhonen, Eero Holmström, S. Valkonen, Y. Nuutinen, R. Picchio","doi":"10.3832/ifor4204-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of continuous cover forestry (CCF) is increasing, yet there is lack of data and understanding about many aspects of this management, including the operational costs. Our objectives were to retrieve available harvesting cost models from published studies on selection cutting in Norway-spruce-dominated stands in Scandinavian countries and to evaluate them against real case studies. First, we retrieved three recently published harvesting cost models which provided explicit cost functions. Models 1 and 2, based on rotation forestry (RF) data and adapted for CCF, had separate sub-models for cutting and hauling costs. Model 3 was based on CCF data and produced total harvesting costs, including the cutting and hauling costs combined. Second, we measured cutting costs for 29 harvesting operations on stands with different stages of CCF structure. We then compared the observations with the simulations of Models 1 and 2 cutting cost sub-models for those cases. Third, we expanded the dataset, including a further 34 harvesting operations in stands with more advanced CCF structures (without measured costs). We then simulated the total harvesting costs for all three models in this dataset to investigate their general behaviour. On average, Models 1 and 2 cutting cost sub-models had relatively good and consistent predictions compared with the observed values. However, they differed in total costs due to different estimates for the hauling cost sub-models. Model 3 had predictions comparable to Models 1 and 2 in the more advanced stages of CCF, but much higher in the less advanced. This study provides important data regarding cutting costs in CCF and demonstrates the feasibility of using existing harvesting cost models.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4204-016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of continuous cover forestry (CCF) is increasing, yet there is lack of data and understanding about many aspects of this management, including the operational costs. Our objectives were to retrieve available harvesting cost models from published studies on selection cutting in Norway-spruce-dominated stands in Scandinavian countries and to evaluate them against real case studies. First, we retrieved three recently published harvesting cost models which provided explicit cost functions. Models 1 and 2, based on rotation forestry (RF) data and adapted for CCF, had separate sub-models for cutting and hauling costs. Model 3 was based on CCF data and produced total harvesting costs, including the cutting and hauling costs combined. Second, we measured cutting costs for 29 harvesting operations on stands with different stages of CCF structure. We then compared the observations with the simulations of Models 1 and 2 cutting cost sub-models for those cases. Third, we expanded the dataset, including a further 34 harvesting operations in stands with more advanced CCF structures (without measured costs). We then simulated the total harvesting costs for all three models in this dataset to investigate their general behaviour. On average, Models 1 and 2 cutting cost sub-models had relatively good and consistent predictions compared with the observed values. However, they differed in total costs due to different estimates for the hauling cost sub-models. Model 3 had predictions comparable to Models 1 and 2 in the more advanced stages of CCF, but much higher in the less advanced. This study provides important data regarding cutting costs in CCF and demonstrates the feasibility of using existing harvesting cost models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯堪的纳维亚连续覆盖森林选伐经营成本管理模式评价
持续覆盖森林(CCF)的重要性正在增加,但缺乏关于这种管理的许多方面的数据和了解,包括运营成本。我们的目标是从已发表的关于斯堪的纳维亚国家以挪威云杉为主的林分选择采伐的研究中检索可用的采伐成本模型,并根据实际案例研究对其进行评估。首先,我们检索了三个最近发表的收获成本模型,它们提供了明确的成本函数。模型1和模型2基于轮作林业(RF)数据并适应CCF,具有单独的采伐和运输成本子模型。模型3基于CCF数据,得出了总收获成本,包括切割和运输成本的总和。其次,我们测量了29种不同CCF结构阶段林分的采伐成本。然后,我们将这些观测结果与模型1和模型2削减成本子模型的模拟结果进行了比较。第三,我们扩展了数据集,在具有更先进的CCF结构的林分中增加了34个收获操作(没有测量成本)。然后,我们模拟了该数据集中所有三种模型的总收获成本,以调查它们的一般行为。平均而言,模型1和模型2的切割成本子模型与观测值相比具有较好的一致性预测。然而,由于对运输成本子模型的估计不同,它们在总成本上存在差异。模型3在CCF较晚期阶段的预测与模型1和模型2相当,但在较不晚期阶段的预测要高得多。本研究提供了降低CCF成本的重要数据,并证明了使用现有收获成本模型的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.
期刊最新文献
How biomass and other tree architectural characteristics relate to the structural complexity of a beech-pine forest Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy A WebGIS tool to support forest management at regional and local scale Variations in the performance of hybrid poplars subjected to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and water restriction Effects of silvicultural thinning on stand structure and coarse woody debris in the deciduous Arasbaran forest, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1