Zebras, Bacteria and Asteroids

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY TPM-The Philosophers Magazine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5840/TPM2021927
Toby Friend
{"title":"Zebras, Bacteria and Asteroids","authors":"Toby Friend","doi":"10.5840/TPM2021927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two tenets are of significant concern to today’s philosophers of science: one continues to be that age-old idea of Scientific Realism, the other is a more contemporary assertion of the Metaphysical Unity to science. Although the motivations for or against them are very different, there seems to be a payoff with the degree to which anyone has so-far been able to accept one given their acceptance of the other. Or at least, that is what a survey of recent debate would seem to suggest. Why is this? I’ll hazard a guess after laying out what exactly the tenets claim and how philosophers have tried to orient themselves between them.","PeriodicalId":42886,"journal":{"name":"TPM-The Philosophers Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPM-The Philosophers Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/TPM2021927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two tenets are of significant concern to today’s philosophers of science: one continues to be that age-old idea of Scientific Realism, the other is a more contemporary assertion of the Metaphysical Unity to science. Although the motivations for or against them are very different, there seems to be a payoff with the degree to which anyone has so-far been able to accept one given their acceptance of the other. Or at least, that is what a survey of recent debate would seem to suggest. Why is this? I’ll hazard a guess after laying out what exactly the tenets claim and how philosophers have tried to orient themselves between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斑马、细菌和小行星
对于今天的科学哲学家来说,有两个重要的原则:一个是古老的科学实在论,另一个是更现代的对科学的形而上学统一的主张。尽管支持或反对它们的动机非常不同,但迄今为止,人们能够接受其中一种的程度似乎是有回报的。或者至少,这似乎是对最近辩论的一项调查所表明的。为什么会这样?在阐述了这些信条到底是什么,以及哲学家们是如何试图在它们之间定位自己的之后,我将大胆猜测一下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Older and Wiser? Knowing Animals Why Does It Have To Mean Anything? Life is Hard: How Philosophy Can Help Us Find Our Way The Forum: Radical Feminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1