50-year proliferation of music medical science research: A bibliometric review

Zachary Levine, Mackenzie Campbell, Abeer Adil, Shaul Kruger, David Alter
{"title":"50-year proliferation of music medical science research: A bibliometric review","authors":"Zachary Levine, Mackenzie Campbell, Abeer Adil, Shaul Kruger, David Alter","doi":"10.47513/mmd.v15i1.903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extent to which music research has penetrated the medical science literature relative to other forms of research remains unclear. We sought to explore temporal changes in the number of music related publications relative to all medical literature as well as prespecified research subdomains of drug therapy, alternative therapy, and neuroscience between 1970 and 2019. We conducted a bibliometric review in which we quantified the number of annual publications between 1970 and 2019 using MEDLINE (PUBMED) search engine and mesh terms of “Music”; “Drug therapy”; “Alternative Medicine”; “Neuroscience”. The number of publications were quantified relative to all publications within their corresponding years. We also examined the types of journals, geographical location of publication (Based on corresponding author), and journal impact factors. To ensure appropriate content, we conducted a hand review of a random 400 abstracts to ensure they met appropriate criteria for music-medical research. We used log-linear regression, to test differences in growth rates. We determined that the relative growth in the number of music publications accelerated at a rate higher than all medical related publications or those confined to drug therapy. The proliferation of music research was attributable to higher rates of neuroscience, alternative therapy, and music therapy research. In conclusion, the temporal growth in number of music research publications relative to other comparators over the past 50 years underscores the importance, relevance, and maturation of music as an evolving discipline of contemporary medical science.","PeriodicalId":74233,"journal":{"name":"Music and medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47513/mmd.v15i1.903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent to which music research has penetrated the medical science literature relative to other forms of research remains unclear. We sought to explore temporal changes in the number of music related publications relative to all medical literature as well as prespecified research subdomains of drug therapy, alternative therapy, and neuroscience between 1970 and 2019. We conducted a bibliometric review in which we quantified the number of annual publications between 1970 and 2019 using MEDLINE (PUBMED) search engine and mesh terms of “Music”; “Drug therapy”; “Alternative Medicine”; “Neuroscience”. The number of publications were quantified relative to all publications within their corresponding years. We also examined the types of journals, geographical location of publication (Based on corresponding author), and journal impact factors. To ensure appropriate content, we conducted a hand review of a random 400 abstracts to ensure they met appropriate criteria for music-medical research. We used log-linear regression, to test differences in growth rates. We determined that the relative growth in the number of music publications accelerated at a rate higher than all medical related publications or those confined to drug therapy. The proliferation of music research was attributable to higher rates of neuroscience, alternative therapy, and music therapy research. In conclusion, the temporal growth in number of music research publications relative to other comparators over the past 50 years underscores the importance, relevance, and maturation of music as an evolving discipline of contemporary medical science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50年来音乐医学科学研究的扩散:文献计量学回顾
相对于其他形式的研究,音乐研究在医学文献中的渗透程度尚不清楚。我们试图探索1970年至2019年间,相对于所有医学文献以及药物治疗、替代疗法和神经科学的预先指定研究子领域,音乐相关出版物数量的时间变化。我们进行了文献计量学回顾,使用MEDLINE (PUBMED)搜索引擎和网格词“Music”对1970年至2019年的年度出版物数量进行了量化;“药物治疗”;“替代医学”;“神经”。出版物数量相对于相应年份的所有出版物进行量化。我们还研究了期刊类型、出版地理位置(基于通讯作者)和期刊影响因子。为了确保合适的内容,我们随机对400篇摘要进行了手工审查,以确保它们符合音乐医学研究的适当标准。我们使用对数线性回归来检验增长率的差异。我们确定,音乐出版物数量的相对增长速度高于所有医学相关出版物或仅限于药物治疗的出版物。音乐研究的激增是由于神经科学、替代疗法和音乐疗法研究的比例较高。总之,在过去50年中,音乐研究出版物数量相对于其他比较物的时间增长强调了音乐作为当代医学科学中不断发展的学科的重要性、相关性和成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental Music Therapy (EMT) to reduce stress and anxiety with patients, caregivers, and hospital staff during the COVID pandemic Music therapy as a potential treatment for overactive bladder – a contemporary review An investigation of thermal patterns in guitarists performing a musician-specific exercise program Music of different styles can affect welfare in pigs with different breeds REARRANGED: An opera singer’s facial cancer and life transposed Kathleen Watt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1