Religion and Ethnicity: Paradoxes and Scientific Challenges

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2021-10-07 DOI:10.1080/00207659.2021.1964273
L. Dimova, Martin Dimov
{"title":"Religion and Ethnicity: Paradoxes and Scientific Challenges","authors":"L. Dimova, Martin Dimov","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2021.1964273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates connections between religion and ethnicity based on the ISSP Religion’18 module’s data , collected in 2018/19 in 28 countries from all over the world. The focus is on individual religiosity and ethnic self-identities in a general context, personally reported by 39,115 respondents. Implementing a purposefully designed algorithm the societies have been split up into majority and minority ethnic groups, and statistical modeling was used to determine the influencing factors for their levels of religiosity. The key results of the analysis showed a significant division between religiosity, belonging to a denomination, and believing in God. These three religious components had different impacts on ethnic identity - belonging standing out as the strongest one. Ethnic minorities (not only migrants) have a higher level of religiosity, believing, and belonging, compared to ethnic majorities. Believing in God does not necessarily mean believing in religious markers like life after death, heaven, hell etc., which could be considered both as a paradox and as a scientific challenge. Furthermore, religious and ethnic identities have hybrid characteristics and depend on cultural and economic environment - GDP registered a high correlation with religiosity.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1964273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates connections between religion and ethnicity based on the ISSP Religion’18 module’s data , collected in 2018/19 in 28 countries from all over the world. The focus is on individual religiosity and ethnic self-identities in a general context, personally reported by 39,115 respondents. Implementing a purposefully designed algorithm the societies have been split up into majority and minority ethnic groups, and statistical modeling was used to determine the influencing factors for their levels of religiosity. The key results of the analysis showed a significant division between religiosity, belonging to a denomination, and believing in God. These three religious components had different impacts on ethnic identity - belonging standing out as the strongest one. Ethnic minorities (not only migrants) have a higher level of religiosity, believing, and belonging, compared to ethnic majorities. Believing in God does not necessarily mean believing in religious markers like life after death, heaven, hell etc., which could be considered both as a paradox and as a scientific challenge. Furthermore, religious and ethnic identities have hybrid characteristics and depend on cultural and economic environment - GDP registered a high correlation with religiosity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教与种族:悖论与科学挑战
本研究基于ISSP religion ' 18模块的数据,调查了宗教与种族之间的联系,这些数据收集于2018/19年,来自世界各地的28个国家。重点是一般情况下的个人宗教信仰和种族自我认同,由39,115名受访者亲自报告。通过有目的地设计算法,将社会划分为多数民族和少数民族,并使用统计建模来确定其宗教信仰水平的影响因素。分析的关键结果显示了宗教虔诚度(属于一个教派)和信仰上帝之间的显著分歧。这三种宗教成分对族群认同的影响各不相同,其中归属的影响最为显著。与多数民族相比,少数民族(不仅仅是移民)有更高的宗教信仰、信仰和归属感。相信上帝并不一定意味着相信宗教标记,如死后的生活,天堂,地狱等,这可以被认为是一个悖论,也是一个科学挑战。此外,宗教和种族认同具有混合特征,并取决于文化和经济环境——GDP与宗教虔诚度高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Including Marine-Related Items in the ISSP Environment Module is Important for a More Holistic Measure of Public Environmental Perceptions When do Women Take the Lead? Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective Automated Futures, Altered Priorities: The Impact of Technological Change on Environmental Attitudes and Policies Using the Campbell Paradigm to Understand the Role of Institutional Trust in Environmental Policy Support Do “environmental losers” pay the price? The role of individual and country vulnerabilities in the relationship between environmental concern and willingness to pay to protect the environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1