Clomipramine as an alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for patients at haemorrhagic risk

Reuben White, M. Papadopoulos, P. Tibrewal
{"title":"Clomipramine as an alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for patients at haemorrhagic risk","authors":"Reuben White, M. Papadopoulos, P. Tibrewal","doi":"10.1177/00048674221096617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) can cause haemorrhage secondary to decreased platelet aggregation thus limiting pharmacological treatment options in Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients with bleeding tendency (Laporte et al., 2017). We report a case where Clomipramine was better tolerated than SSRIs in a patient with recurrent epistaxis and recommend it as an alternative to SSRIs in patients susceptible to haemorrhagic complications. EL is a 59-year-old male, with a 15-year history of schizophrenia stable on Paliperidone 3 monthly depot and a 10-year history of OCD that responded well to Fluvoxamine but was selfceased due to recurrent epistaxis. In February 2021, EL was admitted to an acute psychiatric inpatient ward with obsessive ruminations about past social interactions where he would ‘replay conversations’ in his mind incessantly. The associated anxiety led to reduced self-care, isolation and disengagement with community mental health services. The psychotic symptoms were not dominant. EL was commenced on Sertraline 25 mg and titrated to 50 mg, but subsequently experienced recurrent episodes of severe epistaxis, which resolved with cessation. Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was applied to Sertraline and in retrospect to Fluvoxamine (Naranjo et al., 1981). The SSRIs scored 7 and 8, respectively, indicating probable adverse drug reaction (ADR). Further exploration of the aetiology of his epistaxis also revealed a nasal septal defect and Polycythemia Rubra Vera (PCV) for which he was commenced on Aspirin 100 mg/day and Hydroxyurea 1000 mg mane. PCV increases the risk of thrombosis and haemorrhage and Aspirin increases the risk of bleeding. Subsequent treatment with an SSRI would have further increased this risk. We therefore initiated a trial of Clomipramine which has a theoretical advantage over SSRIs of increased platelet aggregation (Alvarez et al., 1999). Clomipramine was gradually uptitrated to 175 mg/day with no further epistaxis during the admission. EL’s OCD symptoms improved with his Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score reducing from 22 at admission to 14 at discharge. He exhibited improved selfcare, social interactions and mood. Clomipramine is a third-line pharmacological treatment for OCD. Like SSRIs it can also increase the risk of haemorrhage via decreased platelet aggregation However, unlike SSRIs, Clomipramine is distinctly a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist which is proposed to lead to compensatory up-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors promoting platelet aggregation (Alvarez et al., 1999). It is possible that this mechanism helped prevent epistaxis in EL and led to better clinical outcome. To our knowledge, this is the first report comparing clomipramine and SSRIs in patients with haemorrhagic complications and provides the clinicians a safer alternative in such cases.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221096617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) can cause haemorrhage secondary to decreased platelet aggregation thus limiting pharmacological treatment options in Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients with bleeding tendency (Laporte et al., 2017). We report a case where Clomipramine was better tolerated than SSRIs in a patient with recurrent epistaxis and recommend it as an alternative to SSRIs in patients susceptible to haemorrhagic complications. EL is a 59-year-old male, with a 15-year history of schizophrenia stable on Paliperidone 3 monthly depot and a 10-year history of OCD that responded well to Fluvoxamine but was selfceased due to recurrent epistaxis. In February 2021, EL was admitted to an acute psychiatric inpatient ward with obsessive ruminations about past social interactions where he would ‘replay conversations’ in his mind incessantly. The associated anxiety led to reduced self-care, isolation and disengagement with community mental health services. The psychotic symptoms were not dominant. EL was commenced on Sertraline 25 mg and titrated to 50 mg, but subsequently experienced recurrent episodes of severe epistaxis, which resolved with cessation. Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was applied to Sertraline and in retrospect to Fluvoxamine (Naranjo et al., 1981). The SSRIs scored 7 and 8, respectively, indicating probable adverse drug reaction (ADR). Further exploration of the aetiology of his epistaxis also revealed a nasal septal defect and Polycythemia Rubra Vera (PCV) for which he was commenced on Aspirin 100 mg/day and Hydroxyurea 1000 mg mane. PCV increases the risk of thrombosis and haemorrhage and Aspirin increases the risk of bleeding. Subsequent treatment with an SSRI would have further increased this risk. We therefore initiated a trial of Clomipramine which has a theoretical advantage over SSRIs of increased platelet aggregation (Alvarez et al., 1999). Clomipramine was gradually uptitrated to 175 mg/day with no further epistaxis during the admission. EL’s OCD symptoms improved with his Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score reducing from 22 at admission to 14 at discharge. He exhibited improved selfcare, social interactions and mood. Clomipramine is a third-line pharmacological treatment for OCD. Like SSRIs it can also increase the risk of haemorrhage via decreased platelet aggregation However, unlike SSRIs, Clomipramine is distinctly a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist which is proposed to lead to compensatory up-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors promoting platelet aggregation (Alvarez et al., 1999). It is possible that this mechanism helped prevent epistaxis in EL and led to better clinical outcome. To our knowledge, this is the first report comparing clomipramine and SSRIs in patients with haemorrhagic complications and provides the clinicians a safer alternative in such cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯丙咪嗪作为选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂对出血风险患者的替代
选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)可导致继发于血小板聚集减少的出血,从而限制了有出血倾向的强迫症(OCD)患者的药物治疗选择(Laporte等,2017)。我们报告了一个病例,氯丙咪嗪在复发性鼻出血患者中的耐受性优于SSRIs,并推荐其作为易发生出血并发症的患者的SSRIs的替代方案。EL是一名59岁男性,15年精神分裂症病史,服用帕利哌酮3个月稳定,10年强迫症病史,氟伏沙明反应良好,但因复发性鼻出血而自行停止。2021年2月,EL被送进了一家急性精神病住院病房,他对过去的社交互动进行了强迫性的反思,他会不断地在脑海中“回放对话”。相关的焦虑导致自我护理减少、孤立和脱离社区精神卫生服务。精神症状不明显。EL开始使用舍曲林25mg,然后滴定到50mg,但随后出现了反复发作的严重鼻出血,停药后消失。使用Naranjo药物不良反应概率量表评价舍曲林,回顾氟伏沙明(Naranjo et al., 1981)。SSRIs评分分别为7分和8分,提示可能的药物不良反应(ADR)。进一步检查其鼻出血的病因还发现鼻中隔缺损和红色红细胞增多症(PCV),他开始服用阿司匹林100毫克/天和羟脲1000毫克/天。PCV增加血栓形成和出血的风险,阿司匹林增加出血的风险。随后的SSRI治疗会进一步增加这种风险。因此,我们启动了氯丙咪嗪的试验,它在理论上比SSRIs具有增加血小板聚集的优势(Alvarez et al., 1999)。氯丙咪嗪逐渐增加至175 mg/天,入院期间无进一步出血。EL的强迫症症状有所改善,他的耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表得分从入院时的22分降至出院时的14分。他表现出更好的自我照顾、社交互动和情绪。氯丙咪嗪是治疗强迫症的三线药物。然而,与SSRIs不同的是,氯丙咪嗪明显是一种5-HT2受体拮抗剂,可导致5-HT2受体代偿性上调,促进血小板聚集(Alvarez et al., 1999)。这是可能的,这一机制有助于防止鼻出血在EL和导致更好的临床结果。据我们所知,这是第一份比较氯咪嗪和SSRIs在出血性并发症患者中的应用的报告,为临床医生提供了一种更安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mortality in people living with dementia who self-harmed: An Australian data linkage study Exploring the use of electroconvulsive therapy in the anticoagulated population: A systematic review Evaluation of Monitoring Practices in Patients on Novel Antipsychotics Myoclonus in Psychiatry Pain Medicine: New Frontiers in Moving from Cell to Soul, and Back
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1