Organization engagement: a review and comparison to job engagement

A. Saks, Jamie A. Gruman, Qian Zhang
{"title":"Organization engagement: a review and comparison to job engagement","authors":"A. Saks, Jamie A. Gruman, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1108/joepp-12-2020-0253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEmployee engagement has received a considerable amount of research attention over the last decade. However, most of the research has been on job or work engagement. Much less attention has been given to organization engagement, which is a distinct but related target of employee engagement. In this paper, we review the research on organization engagement and identify how it has been measured, its antecedents and consequences and how it compares to job engagement.Design/methodology/approachThis paper provides a narrative review of 40 studies that have measured organization engagement. Most of these studies have been published in the last five years, and they come from 20 different countries. The majority of studies also measured job or work engagement.FindingsMost studies used Saks' (2006) measure of organization engagement. Many antecedents have been found to be related to organization engagement; however, those most often studied and consistently related to organization engagement are organizational-related resources such as perceived organizational support (POS), justice perceptions, corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational structural factors, organizational climate and HR practices. Organization engagement has been found to be positively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), job performance and organizational performance and negatively related to intention to quit. Organization engagement has also been found to partially or fully mediate the relationship between antecedents and consequences. In comparison to job engagement, organization engagement scores tend to be lower, and there are meaningful differences in the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and job engagement. A number of studies found that organization engagement was more strongly related to several of the consequences than job engagement.Practical implicationsThe results of this review indicate that organization engagement is as important if not more important than job engagement when it comes to its relationship to some of the consequences of employee engagement. Organizations should include a measure of organization engagement in employee surveys and focus on improving organization engagement by providing a supportive work environment, ensuring that employees have positive perceptions of justice, increasing CSR initiatives, providing a variety of human resources (HR) practices and improving organizational climate.Originality/valueThis paper provides the first comprehensive review of research on organization engagement and offers a new model of the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and compares organization engagement to job engagement.","PeriodicalId":51810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-12-2020-0253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

PurposeEmployee engagement has received a considerable amount of research attention over the last decade. However, most of the research has been on job or work engagement. Much less attention has been given to organization engagement, which is a distinct but related target of employee engagement. In this paper, we review the research on organization engagement and identify how it has been measured, its antecedents and consequences and how it compares to job engagement.Design/methodology/approachThis paper provides a narrative review of 40 studies that have measured organization engagement. Most of these studies have been published in the last five years, and they come from 20 different countries. The majority of studies also measured job or work engagement.FindingsMost studies used Saks' (2006) measure of organization engagement. Many antecedents have been found to be related to organization engagement; however, those most often studied and consistently related to organization engagement are organizational-related resources such as perceived organizational support (POS), justice perceptions, corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational structural factors, organizational climate and HR practices. Organization engagement has been found to be positively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), job performance and organizational performance and negatively related to intention to quit. Organization engagement has also been found to partially or fully mediate the relationship between antecedents and consequences. In comparison to job engagement, organization engagement scores tend to be lower, and there are meaningful differences in the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and job engagement. A number of studies found that organization engagement was more strongly related to several of the consequences than job engagement.Practical implicationsThe results of this review indicate that organization engagement is as important if not more important than job engagement when it comes to its relationship to some of the consequences of employee engagement. Organizations should include a measure of organization engagement in employee surveys and focus on improving organization engagement by providing a supportive work environment, ensuring that employees have positive perceptions of justice, increasing CSR initiatives, providing a variety of human resources (HR) practices and improving organizational climate.Originality/valueThis paper provides the first comprehensive review of research on organization engagement and offers a new model of the antecedents and consequences of organization engagement and compares organization engagement to job engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织敬业度:对工作敬业度的回顾与比较
在过去的十年里,员工敬业度受到了相当多的研究关注。然而,大多数研究都是关于工作或工作投入的。很少有人关注组织敬业度,这是员工敬业度的一个不同但相关的目标。在本文中,我们回顾了组织敬业度的研究,并确定了它是如何测量的,它的前因和后果,以及它与工作敬业度的比较。设计/方法论/方法本文对40项测量组织参与度的研究进行了叙述性回顾。这些研究大多是在过去五年内发表的,它们来自20个不同的国家。大多数研究还衡量了工作或工作投入。大多数研究使用Saks(2006)的组织敬业度测量方法。许多前因都与组织敬业度有关;然而,那些与组织敬业度最常被研究和持续相关的是组织相关资源,如感知组织支持(POS)、公平感、企业社会责任(CSR)、组织结构因素、组织气候和人力资源实践。组织敬业度与工作满意度、组织承诺、组织公民行为、工作绩效和组织绩效正相关,与离职意向负相关。组织敬业度也被发现部分或完全调解前因和后果之间的关系。与工作敬业度相比,组织敬业度得分倾向于较低,组织敬业度和工作敬业度在前因和后果上存在显著差异。许多研究发现,与工作投入相比,组织投入与一些后果的关系更为密切。实际意义本综述的结果表明,当涉及到员工敬业度的一些后果时,组织敬业度与工作敬业度一样重要,如果不是更重要的话。组织应该在员工调查中纳入组织参与度的衡量标准,并通过提供支持性的工作环境、确保员工对正义有积极的看法、增加企业社会责任计划、提供各种人力资源(HR)实践和改善组织氛围来关注提高组织参与度。原创性/价值本文首次全面回顾了组织敬业度的研究,提出了组织敬业度的前因和后果的新模型,并将组织敬业度与工作敬业度进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
The effects of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic on work–life balance, work–family conflict and employee burnout Climate of fear and job apathy as fallout of supervisory nonphysical hostility toward casual workers in the banking industry Agile work practices and team creativity: the mediating role of team efficacy Performance management systems in a shared service centre: an exploration of organisational injustice Leaders' Machiavellianism and subordinates' task performance: a multilevel investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1