Biodentine stimulates the migratory and biological responses of human gingival fibroblast

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Oral Research Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.17126/joralres.2022.019
F. Vazquez-Vazquez, Alejandra Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Fernando Suaste-Olmos, Patricia González‐Alva, M. Álvarez-Pérez
{"title":"Biodentine stimulates the migratory and biological responses of human gingival fibroblast","authors":"F. Vazquez-Vazquez, Alejandra Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Fernando Suaste-Olmos, Patricia González‐Alva, M. Álvarez-Pérez","doi":"10.17126/joralres.2022.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Biodentine (BD), a dentin substitute, is currently used to treat external cervical root resorption, but its effects on gingival fibroblasts (GFs) are not fully known. Objective: To investigate and compare BD and MTA (mineral trioxide aggre-gate) in terms of proliferative, migratory, and adhesion effects on human pulpal and gingival cells. Material and Methods: Cells were incubated directly on the surface of BD and MTA disks. Adhesion (4 and 24 h) and proliferation (3, 5, 7, 14, 21) were evaluated with crystal violet and MTT assays (n=9 X each group). A wound-healing assay was performed for cell migration, with 0.2 and 2 µg/ml MTA or BD (n=6 X each group). The cut-off point for statistical significance was set at p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001. Results: The best adhesion and proliferation results for gingival fibroblast (GFs) were obtained with BD (p<0.01). MTA and BD enhanced the migration of GFs in a dose-dependent manner, with superior results with BD, and 2 µg/ml was the optimal concentration for enhancing the migration of GFs. Conclusion: Results indicate that BD and MTA exhibit excellent compatibility in terms of cell adhesion, proliferation, and cellular migration. Also, the results suggested that BD is associated with better results than MTA in GFs. The results support the clinical application of BD in areas colonized with GFs.","PeriodicalId":16625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2022.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Biodentine (BD), a dentin substitute, is currently used to treat external cervical root resorption, but its effects on gingival fibroblasts (GFs) are not fully known. Objective: To investigate and compare BD and MTA (mineral trioxide aggre-gate) in terms of proliferative, migratory, and adhesion effects on human pulpal and gingival cells. Material and Methods: Cells were incubated directly on the surface of BD and MTA disks. Adhesion (4 and 24 h) and proliferation (3, 5, 7, 14, 21) were evaluated with crystal violet and MTT assays (n=9 X each group). A wound-healing assay was performed for cell migration, with 0.2 and 2 µg/ml MTA or BD (n=6 X each group). The cut-off point for statistical significance was set at p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001. Results: The best adhesion and proliferation results for gingival fibroblast (GFs) were obtained with BD (p<0.01). MTA and BD enhanced the migration of GFs in a dose-dependent manner, with superior results with BD, and 2 µg/ml was the optimal concentration for enhancing the migration of GFs. Conclusion: Results indicate that BD and MTA exhibit excellent compatibility in terms of cell adhesion, proliferation, and cellular migration. Also, the results suggested that BD is associated with better results than MTA in GFs. The results support the clinical application of BD in areas colonized with GFs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物牙牙定刺激人牙龈成纤维细胞的迁移和生物学反应
生物牙本质(BD)是一种牙本质替代物,目前用于治疗颈外根吸收,但其对牙龈成纤维细胞(GFs)的影响尚不完全清楚。目的:探讨和比较bd3和MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate -gate)对人牙髓和牙龈细胞的增殖、迁移和粘附作用。材料和方法:细胞直接在BD和MTA圆盘表面孵育。结晶紫法和MTT法检测粘附(4、24 h)和增殖(3、5、7、14、21 h),每组n=9 X。用0.2和2µg/ml MTA或BD(每组n=6 X)进行伤口愈合试验以观察细胞迁移。差异有统计学意义的分界点分别为p<0.05、p<0.01和p<0.001。结果:BD对牙龈成纤维细胞的粘附和增殖效果最好(p<0.01)。MTA和BD均能增强GFs的迁移,且呈剂量依赖性,其中以BD效果更好,2µg/ml为增强GFs迁移的最佳浓度。结论:BD和MTA在细胞粘附、增殖和细胞迁移方面具有良好的相容性。此外,结果表明,在GFs中,BD比MTA具有更好的结果。该结果支持了BD在GFs集中地区的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Research
Journal of Oral Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Research which is published every two month, is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge in oral and craniofacial sciences, including: oral surgery and medicine and rehabilitation, craniofacial surgery, dentistry, orofacial pain and motor disorders, head and neck surgery, speech and swallowing disorders, and other related disciplines. Journal of Oral Research publishes original research articles and brief communications, systematic reviews, study protocols, research hypotheses, reports of cases, comments and perspectives. Indexed by Scopus, DOAJ, LILACS, Latindex, IMBIOMED, DIALNET,REDIB and Google Scholar. Journal of Oral Research is a member of COPE.
期刊最新文献
Preventive program based on multiple intelligences to promote oral health in disabled children from Chiclayo, Peru Effectiveness of lip repositioning in the treatment of excessive gingival display: systematic review and meta-analysis Camellia sinensis, a natural product to support the treatment of medical and stomatological conditions In vitro comparison of marginal infiltration between a conventional resin and a bulk-fill resin, in the relocation of cervical margins technique Characteristics of the bachelor thesis in dentistry, Satisfaction and motivations of the students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1