Quantifying in vitrocomplement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) using advanced flow cytometry

Kirsty A McBain, J. Lovchik, N. Bevan
{"title":"Quantifying in vitrocomplement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) using advanced flow cytometry","authors":"Kirsty A McBain, J. Lovchik, N. Bevan","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.210.supp.145.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) is a key Fc mediated function of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. mAb binding to antigen triggers a complex molecular cascade with sequential recruitment of serum proteins, eventuating in target cell lysis. Here we demonstrate CDC quantification in a streamlined, in vitro, advanced flow cytometry assay.\n Anti-CD20 mAbs were incubated with target cell lines in 96- or 384-well plates. Human serum (15%) was then added to induce CDC. Cells were labeled with iQue® Cell Membrane Integrity (R/Red) Dye to enable assessment of cell death using the iQue® Advanced Flow Cytometry Platform.\n Induction of CDC by anti-CD20 mAbs correlated with target cell CD20 expression, with most cell death observed with high-CD20 expressing Ramos cells. Maximal Ramos cell death induced by Rituximab and Truxima® was 68% and 70%, respectively. Comparatively, cell death of mid-CD20 expressing Raji cells was lower at 34% and 24%. No CDC was induced with CD20 negative Jurkat cells. Another anti-CD20-IgG1 mAb was compared against two isotype mutants: IgG1fut (non-fucosylated) and IgG1NQ (non-glycosylated). Their activity was profiled towards three previously described effector functions: antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC); antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and CDC. CDC induction was comparable between the three mAbs, however their ADCC and ADCP activity differed. The IgG1NQ did not exert ADCP or ADCC activity, whilst the IgG1fut showed more ADCC and less ADCP than the native.\n These data exemplify the use of advanced flow cytometry to quantify Fc function of mAbs towards a range of effector mechanisms, highlighting the potential to profile libraries of novel therapeutics in minimal time.","PeriodicalId":22698,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Immunology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.210.supp.145.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) is a key Fc mediated function of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. mAb binding to antigen triggers a complex molecular cascade with sequential recruitment of serum proteins, eventuating in target cell lysis. Here we demonstrate CDC quantification in a streamlined, in vitro, advanced flow cytometry assay. Anti-CD20 mAbs were incubated with target cell lines in 96- or 384-well plates. Human serum (15%) was then added to induce CDC. Cells were labeled with iQue® Cell Membrane Integrity (R/Red) Dye to enable assessment of cell death using the iQue® Advanced Flow Cytometry Platform. Induction of CDC by anti-CD20 mAbs correlated with target cell CD20 expression, with most cell death observed with high-CD20 expressing Ramos cells. Maximal Ramos cell death induced by Rituximab and Truxima® was 68% and 70%, respectively. Comparatively, cell death of mid-CD20 expressing Raji cells was lower at 34% and 24%. No CDC was induced with CD20 negative Jurkat cells. Another anti-CD20-IgG1 mAb was compared against two isotype mutants: IgG1fut (non-fucosylated) and IgG1NQ (non-glycosylated). Their activity was profiled towards three previously described effector functions: antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC); antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and CDC. CDC induction was comparable between the three mAbs, however their ADCC and ADCP activity differed. The IgG1NQ did not exert ADCP or ADCC activity, whilst the IgG1fut showed more ADCC and less ADCP than the native. These data exemplify the use of advanced flow cytometry to quantify Fc function of mAbs towards a range of effector mechanisms, highlighting the potential to profile libraries of novel therapeutics in minimal time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先进的流式细胞术定量体外补体依赖性细胞毒性(CDC)
补体依赖性细胞毒性(CDC)是单克隆抗体(mAb)治疗的关键Fc介导功能。单抗与抗原结合触发复杂的分子级联反应,依次募集血清蛋白,最终导致靶细胞裂解。在这里,我们演示了CDC定量在一个流线型,体外,先进的流式细胞术测定。抗cd20单克隆抗体与目标细胞系在96孔或384孔板中孵育。然后加入人血清(15%)诱导CDC。细胞用iQue®细胞膜完整性(R/Red)染料标记,以便使用iQue®高级流式细胞术平台评估细胞死亡。抗CD20单克隆抗体诱导的CDC与靶细胞CD20表达相关,在高CD20表达的Ramos细胞中观察到大多数细胞死亡。利妥昔单抗和Truxima诱导的最大Ramos细胞死亡分别为68%和70%。相比之下,表达Raji细胞中cd20的细胞死亡率较低,分别为34%和24%。CD20阴性Jurkat细胞未诱导CDC。将另一种抗cd20 - igg1单抗与两种同型突变体:IgG1fut(非聚焦)和IgG1NQ(非糖基化)进行比较。它们的活性被描述为三个先前描述的效应功能:抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC);抗体依赖性细胞吞噬(ADCP)和CDC。三种单抗之间的CDC诱导具有可比性,但它们的ADCC和ADCP活性不同。IgG1NQ不表现ADCP或ADCC活性,而IgG1fut表现出更多的ADCC和更少的ADCP。这些数据说明了使用先进的流式细胞术来量化单克隆抗体针对一系列效应机制的Fc功能,突出了在最短时间内分析新治疗药物文库的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges in the Development of NK-92 Cells as an Effective Universal Off-the-Shelf Cellular Therapeutic. Understanding the Role of miR-29a in the Regulation of RAG1, a Gene Associated with the Development of the Immune System. N-Glycan Branching Regulates BTLA Opposite to PD-1 to Limit T Cell Hyperactivity Induced by Branching Deficiency. Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Vaccine-naive Pregnant Women: Assessment of IgG and IgA Antibody Profile at Delivery and 42 Days Postpartum. Top Reads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1