Haunted House: Physical Smart Home Event Verification in the Presence of Compromised Sensors

IF 3.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Internet of Things Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1145/3506859
S. Birnbach, Simon Eberz, I. Martinovic
{"title":"Haunted House: Physical Smart Home Event Verification in the Presence of Compromised Sensors","authors":"S. Birnbach, Simon Eberz, I. Martinovic","doi":"10.1145/3506859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we verify physical events using data from an ensemble of smart home sensors. This approach both protects against event sensor faults and sophisticated attackers. To validate our system’s performance, we set up a “smart home” in an office environment. We recognize 22 event types using 48 sensors over the course of two weeks. Using data from the physical sensors, we verify the event stream supplied by the event sensors to detect both masking and spoofing attacks. We consider three threat models: a zero-effort attacker, an opportunistic attacker, and a sensor-compromise attacker who can arbitrarily modify live sensor data. For spoofed events, we achieve perfect classification for 9 out of 22 events and achieve a 0% false alarm rate at a detection rate exceeding 99.9% for 15 events. For 11 events the majority of masking attacks can be detected without causing any false alarms. We also show that even a strong opportunistic attacker is inherently limited to spoofing few select events and that doing so involves lengthy waiting periods. Finally, we demonstrate the vulnerability of a single-classifier system to compromised sensor data and introduce a more secure approach based on sensor fusion.","PeriodicalId":29764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this article, we verify physical events using data from an ensemble of smart home sensors. This approach both protects against event sensor faults and sophisticated attackers. To validate our system’s performance, we set up a “smart home” in an office environment. We recognize 22 event types using 48 sensors over the course of two weeks. Using data from the physical sensors, we verify the event stream supplied by the event sensors to detect both masking and spoofing attacks. We consider three threat models: a zero-effort attacker, an opportunistic attacker, and a sensor-compromise attacker who can arbitrarily modify live sensor data. For spoofed events, we achieve perfect classification for 9 out of 22 events and achieve a 0% false alarm rate at a detection rate exceeding 99.9% for 15 events. For 11 events the majority of masking attacks can be detected without causing any false alarms. We also show that even a strong opportunistic attacker is inherently limited to spoofing few select events and that doing so involves lengthy waiting periods. Finally, we demonstrate the vulnerability of a single-classifier system to compromised sensor data and introduce a more secure approach based on sensor fusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鬼屋:存在受损传感器的物理智能家居事件验证
在本文中,我们使用来自智能家居传感器集合的数据验证物理事件。这种方法既可以防止事件传感器故障,也可以防止复杂的攻击者。为了验证系统的性能,我们在办公环境中设置了一个“智能家居”。在两周的时间里,我们使用48个传感器识别了22种事件类型。使用来自物理传感器的数据,我们验证由事件传感器提供的事件流,以检测屏蔽和欺骗攻击。我们考虑了三种威胁模型:零努力攻击者、机会攻击者和可以任意修改实时传感器数据的传感器妥协攻击者。对于欺骗事件,我们对22个事件中的9个事件实现了完美的分类,并且在15个事件的检测率超过99.9%的情况下实现了0%的虚警率。对于11个事件,大多数屏蔽攻击可以被检测到而不会引起任何假警报。我们还表明,即使是强大的机会主义攻击者也天生局限于欺骗少数选定的事件,并且这样做需要很长的等待时间。最后,我们展示了单一分类器系统对受损传感器数据的脆弱性,并介绍了一种基于传感器融合的更安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Issue on Wireless Sensing for IoT Special Issue on Wireless Sensing for IoT: A Word from the Editor-in-Chief Resilient Intermediary‐Based Key Exchange Protocol for IoT A Two-Mode, Adaptive Security Framework for Smart Home Security Applications Online learning for dynamic impending collision prediction using FMCW radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1