A difficult history of light. About metaphysical ideas of “light writing” formulated before the birth of photography

Q4 Arts and Humanities Images (Poland) Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.14746/i.2021.39.14
P. Zawojski
{"title":"A difficult history of light. About metaphysical ideas of “light writing” formulated before the birth of photography","authors":"P. Zawojski","doi":"10.14746/i.2021.39.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reflections presented in this article are devoted to Junko Theresa Mikuriya’s book, A History of Light. The Idea of Photography. It is a unique view on the search for pre-photographic origins of photography in the field of philosophical writings ranging from Plato, through the neoplatonic philosopher Jamblich’s enquiry, to the texts by Philotheus of Batos and by an early Renaissance philosopher, Marsilio Ficino. When thinking about metaphysics present in (moving and still) images, one should not forget about the metaphysics of the image itself. The idea of photography – regardless of whether we are witnessing a fundamental change in an ontological transition from an analogue to a digital form of image recording – obliges us to discuss the “history of light”, as this is what Mikuriya does. While locating the discussed concepts in the context of the history and theory of photography, as well as the archaeology of media, the author of this essay engages in a dialogue with Mikuriya and polemically discusses many of her hypotheses. Key concepts such as chalepon, photagogia, triton genos, phôteinographeisthai are analysed in order to indicate inspiring moments in the Mikuriya’s reflections, but also a kind of interpretive abuse in the process of reading and analysing philosophical texts addressing the issues of light.","PeriodicalId":37086,"journal":{"name":"Images (Poland)","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Images (Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2021.39.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reflections presented in this article are devoted to Junko Theresa Mikuriya’s book, A History of Light. The Idea of Photography. It is a unique view on the search for pre-photographic origins of photography in the field of philosophical writings ranging from Plato, through the neoplatonic philosopher Jamblich’s enquiry, to the texts by Philotheus of Batos and by an early Renaissance philosopher, Marsilio Ficino. When thinking about metaphysics present in (moving and still) images, one should not forget about the metaphysics of the image itself. The idea of photography – regardless of whether we are witnessing a fundamental change in an ontological transition from an analogue to a digital form of image recording – obliges us to discuss the “history of light”, as this is what Mikuriya does. While locating the discussed concepts in the context of the history and theory of photography, as well as the archaeology of media, the author of this essay engages in a dialogue with Mikuriya and polemically discusses many of her hypotheses. Key concepts such as chalepon, photagogia, triton genos, phôteinographeisthai are analysed in order to indicate inspiring moments in the Mikuriya’s reflections, but also a kind of interpretive abuse in the process of reading and analysing philosophical texts addressing the issues of light.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一段艰难的光史。关于摄影诞生前形成的“轻书写”的形而上观念
这篇文章中提出的思考是献给Junko Theresa Mikuriya的书《光的历史》。摄影的理念。这是一个独特的视角,在哲学著作领域寻找摄影的前摄影起源,从柏拉图,通过新柏拉图主义哲学家Jamblich的探究,到巴托斯的菲洛修斯和文艺复兴早期哲学家马西利奥·菲西诺的文本。当思考存在于(移动的和静止的)图像中的形而上学时,人们不应该忘记图像本身的形而上学。摄影的理念——无论我们是否见证了从模拟形式到数字形式的图像记录的本体论转变的根本变化——迫使我们讨论“光的历史”,这正是Mikuriya所做的。在将讨论的概念置于摄影的历史和理论以及媒体考古学的背景下时,本文的作者与Mikuriya进行了对话,并对她的许多假设进行了辩论。对chalepon、photagogia、triton genos、phôteinographeisthai等关键概念进行了分析,以表明Mikuriya反思中的鼓舞人心的时刻,同时也是在阅读和分析解决光问题的哲学文本过程中的一种解释性滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Images (Poland)
Images (Poland) Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queerowanie gier AAA na przykładzie serii Assassin’s Creed – możliwości i zagrożenia Grofilia. Omówienie zjawiska na przykładzie wybranych seriali platformy Netflix Rola regulacji prawnych w kształtowaniu treści gier i mechanizmów ich promocji na przykładzie wybranych zagadnień ochrony konsumentów Postklasyczna groza. Przeobrażenia fuzji gatunkowej survival horroru Otwarty świat i narracja rozproszona w grze Elden Ring studia FromSoftware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1