Influence of fine sediments on meiofauna colonization densities in artificial stream channels

A. J. Radwell, Arthur V. Brown
{"title":"Influence of fine sediments on meiofauna colonization densities in artificial stream channels","authors":"A. J. Radwell, Arthur V. Brown","doi":"10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0165-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive fine sediments have been shown to adversely affect abundance and diversity of stream macroinvertebrates, but effects on meiofauna have been only minimally and indirectly assessed. We used 12 artificial channels in a 4 th order Ozark stream to investigate the influence of silt (particle diameter 63 μm to 2 mm) and gravel (particle diameter 2 to 16 mm) on meiofauna colonization. Four channels were filled with gravel, four with 1/2 gravel and 1/2 sand, and four with 1/3 gravel, 1/3 sand, and 1/3 topsoil, referred to as gravel, sand, and silt treatments, respectively. Substrate cores were taken from the natural and artificial channels for analysis of meiofauna (80 μm to 1 mm) and substrate composition. Rotifera, Copepoda, Chironomidae, Nematoda, Oligochaeta, and Mollusca (principally juvenile Corbicula fluminea) comprised the major meiofauna taxa. Total meiofauna density in the artificial channels differed significantly among treatments. Density was lower in the silt treatment than in gravel or sand treatments, but overall densities in the gravel and sand treatments did not differ. Responses to treatments varied among specific taxa; densities of rotifers, copepods, nematodes, and oligochaetes were lower in the silt than the gravel treatment, but chironomids and nematodes were equally abundant in gravel and sand treatments, while lower in the silt treatment. Total meiofauna density did not differ between the natural channel and the gravel treatment but was lower in the sand and silt treatments. Copepod density was higher in the gravel treatment, and nematode, oligochaete, and mollusk densities were lower for all three treatments compared to the natural channel. The lower density of total meiofauna associated with high concentrations of silt suggests that excessive silt reduces habitat space and/or quality for meiobenthic organisms, while a sand and gravel mix is suitable for some meiofauna taxa.","PeriodicalId":8118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0165-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Excessive fine sediments have been shown to adversely affect abundance and diversity of stream macroinvertebrates, but effects on meiofauna have been only minimally and indirectly assessed. We used 12 artificial channels in a 4 th order Ozark stream to investigate the influence of silt (particle diameter 63 μm to 2 mm) and gravel (particle diameter 2 to 16 mm) on meiofauna colonization. Four channels were filled with gravel, four with 1/2 gravel and 1/2 sand, and four with 1/3 gravel, 1/3 sand, and 1/3 topsoil, referred to as gravel, sand, and silt treatments, respectively. Substrate cores were taken from the natural and artificial channels for analysis of meiofauna (80 μm to 1 mm) and substrate composition. Rotifera, Copepoda, Chironomidae, Nematoda, Oligochaeta, and Mollusca (principally juvenile Corbicula fluminea) comprised the major meiofauna taxa. Total meiofauna density in the artificial channels differed significantly among treatments. Density was lower in the silt treatment than in gravel or sand treatments, but overall densities in the gravel and sand treatments did not differ. Responses to treatments varied among specific taxa; densities of rotifers, copepods, nematodes, and oligochaetes were lower in the silt than the gravel treatment, but chironomids and nematodes were equally abundant in gravel and sand treatments, while lower in the silt treatment. Total meiofauna density did not differ between the natural channel and the gravel treatment but was lower in the sand and silt treatments. Copepod density was higher in the gravel treatment, and nematode, oligochaete, and mollusk densities were lower for all three treatments compared to the natural channel. The lower density of total meiofauna associated with high concentrations of silt suggests that excessive silt reduces habitat space and/or quality for meiobenthic organisms, while a sand and gravel mix is suitable for some meiofauna taxa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细沉积物对人工河道中小型动物定殖密度的影响
过量的细沉积物已被证明会对河流大型无脊椎动物的丰度和多样性产生不利影响,但对小型动物的影响仅进行了最低限度的间接评估。利用欧扎克河4级河道中的12条人工河道,研究了泥沙(粒径63 μm ~ 2 mm)和砾石(粒径2 ~ 16 mm)对小型动物定植的影响。4个通道填入砾石,4个通道填入1/2砾石和1/2砂土,4个通道填入1/3砾石、1/3砂土和1/3表土,分别称为砾石、砂土和淤泥处理。从天然通道和人工通道取底物岩心,分析微藻(80 μm ~ 1 mm)和底物成分。轮虫目、桡足目、手虫科、线虫目、少毛纲和软体动物(主要是幼年河蚌)是主要的小动物类群。人工河道中总数量级动物密度在不同处理间差异显著。淤泥处理的密度低于砾石和砂土处理,但砾石和砂土处理的总体密度没有差异。不同分类群对处理的响应不同;淤泥中轮虫、桡足类、线虫和寡毛纲的密度低于砾石处理,而手蚓类和线虫在砾石和砂石处理中同样丰富,但在淤泥处理中较低。天然河道和砾石河道的总微量动物密度无显著差异,但泥沙河道和淤泥河道的总微量动物密度较低。与自然河道相比,碎石处理的桡足类密度较高,线虫、寡毛类和软体动物密度均较低。少量动物总密度较低,淤泥浓度较高,这表明过多的淤泥减少了少量生物的栖息地空间和/或质量,而砂和砾石混合适合于某些少量动物类群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colloid characterization at the sediment-water interface of Vidy Bay, Lake Geneva Management effects on fungal assemblages in irrigation ponds: are biodiversity conservation and the control of phytopathogens compatible? Oxylipins from freshwater diatoms act as attractants for a benthic herbivore "Spectral fingerprinting" for specific algal groups on sediments in situ: a new sensor Baltic Eubosmina morphological radiation : Sensitivity to invertebrate predators (induction) and observations on genetic differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1