Association between ocular sensory dominance and refractive error asymmetry in myopes

Junping Huang, Binbin Su, Haoran Wu, Zheyi Chen, Siyu Jiang, Xuhong Zhang, Zuopao Zhuo, Bin Zhang, Jun Jiang
{"title":"Association between ocular sensory dominance and refractive error asymmetry in myopes","authors":"Junping Huang, Binbin Su, Haoran Wu, Zheyi Chen, Siyu Jiang, Xuhong Zhang, Zuopao Zhuo, Bin Zhang, Jun Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the association between ocular sensory dominance and interocular refractive error difference (IRED) based on the discrimination of Gabor signal in myopes. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom December 2014 to October 2015, 361 myopia subjects at Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were recruited. Among them, based on the asymmetry between interocular spherical equivalent (SE), 177 subjects were non-anisometropic (IRED≤1D), 184 subjects were anisometropic (IRED>1D).Ocular sensory dominance was measured with computer-based psychophysics techniques. Ocular Sensory Index (OSI) was recorded when a subject just detected the Gabor signal during each trial. T-test was used to compare the 50 OSI values collected from each eye, and the t-val-ue was used as a subject’s ocular dominance index (ODI). \n \n \nResults \nNo significant differences were found in SE, J0 and J45 between non-anisometropic and anisometropic subjects. IRED in non-anisometropic and anisometropic subjects were-0.58±0.33D and-2.52±1.29D respectively, which had significant differences between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z=-20.13, P <0.01). ODI in anisometropic subjects was 4.04±3.74, which was significantly higher than ODI (3.35±2.87) in non-anisometropic subjects (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z=-2.08, P=0.04). In anisometropic subjects, the IRED was correlated with ODI (Pearson correlation analysis, R=0.39, P <0.01). What’s more, the dominant eyes were more myopic in these anisometropic subjects (sign-test, P <0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe anisometropic myopes have stronger ocular dominance in comparison to non-anisometropic myopes. ODI in myopes with clear dominance is associated with IRED, and the dominant eyes are more myopic. \n \n \nKey words: \nSensory dominance; Anisometropia; Psychophysics; Myopia","PeriodicalId":10236,"journal":{"name":"中国实用眼科杂志","volume":"99 1","pages":"601-605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实用眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.06.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between ocular sensory dominance and interocular refractive error difference (IRED) based on the discrimination of Gabor signal in myopes. Methods From December 2014 to October 2015, 361 myopia subjects at Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were recruited. Among them, based on the asymmetry between interocular spherical equivalent (SE), 177 subjects were non-anisometropic (IRED≤1D), 184 subjects were anisometropic (IRED>1D).Ocular sensory dominance was measured with computer-based psychophysics techniques. Ocular Sensory Index (OSI) was recorded when a subject just detected the Gabor signal during each trial. T-test was used to compare the 50 OSI values collected from each eye, and the t-val-ue was used as a subject’s ocular dominance index (ODI). Results No significant differences were found in SE, J0 and J45 between non-anisometropic and anisometropic subjects. IRED in non-anisometropic and anisometropic subjects were-0.58±0.33D and-2.52±1.29D respectively, which had significant differences between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z=-20.13, P <0.01). ODI in anisometropic subjects was 4.04±3.74, which was significantly higher than ODI (3.35±2.87) in non-anisometropic subjects (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Z=-2.08, P=0.04). In anisometropic subjects, the IRED was correlated with ODI (Pearson correlation analysis, R=0.39, P <0.01). What’s more, the dominant eyes were more myopic in these anisometropic subjects (sign-test, P <0.05). Conclusions The anisometropic myopes have stronger ocular dominance in comparison to non-anisometropic myopes. ODI in myopes with clear dominance is associated with IRED, and the dominant eyes are more myopic. Key words: Sensory dominance; Anisometropia; Psychophysics; Myopia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近视眼感觉优势与屈光不对称的关系
目的通过对近视眼Gabor信号的辨别,探讨眼感觉优势与眼间屈光差(IRED)的关系。方法选取2014年12月~ 2015年10月温州医科大学眼科医院近视患者361例。其中,根据眼间球当量(SE)的不对称性,177例受试者为非各向异性(IRED≤1D), 184例受试者为各向异性(IRED>1D)。用基于计算机的心理物理技术测量眼感觉优势。在每次试验中,当受试者仅检测到Gabor信号时,记录眼球感觉指数(OSI)。采用t检验对每只眼睛采集的50个OSI值进行比较,并将t值作为受试者的眼优势指数(ODI)。结果非参差和参差受试者的SE、J0和J45无显著性差异。无参差和参差受试者的IRED分别为0.58±0.33D和2.52±1.29D,差异有统计学意义(Wilcoxon秩和检验,Z=-20.13, P <0.01)。各向异性受试者的ODI为4.04±3.74,显著高于非各向异性受试者的ODI(3.35±2.87)(Wilcoxon秩和检验,Z=-2.08, P=0.04)。在各向异性受试者中,IRED与ODI存在相关性(Pearson相关分析,R=0.39, P <0.01)。屈光参差者的主视眼近视程度更高(P <0.05)。结论屈光参差性近视比非屈光参差性近视具有更强的眼优势。显性近视的ODI与IRED相关,显性眼较近视。关键词:感觉优势;屈光参差症;心理物理学;近视
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9101
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A survey of the effect of cataract operation in Pixian rural areas of Sichuan Compare the clinical effectiveness of silicone intubation for treating chronic dacryocystitis with different type silicone stents Exploration of the preventive effect of triamcinolone acetonide on posterior capsular opacification Investigation of visual and auditory perception in patients undergoing vitrectomy The management of ciliary block glaucoma in nanophthalmic patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1