The evolution of law under communism and post-communism: a system-theory analysis in the spirit of Luhmann

Bruno Schönfelder
{"title":"The evolution of law under communism and post-communism: a system-theory analysis in the spirit of Luhmann","authors":"Bruno Schönfelder","doi":"10.3326/FINTP.40.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper suggests that Luhmann’s theory of social systems and evolution offers a powerful approach for analyzing law and the economy. It considers Yugoslavia and some Central European countries before and after 1990. Luhmann’s concept of evolution stands in stark contrast to mainstream economic theory. It enables us to clarify the concept of transformation. A transformation became necessary because communism was an evolutionary dead end. According to this view, in postcommunism the primacy of functional differentiation needs to be reestablished because it was partially reversed under communist rule. In these circumstances, the popular call for “sufficient†public control over the market is asking for the impossible. Post-communist law is bound to fall behind the evolution of markets. This causes economic problems and retards financial deepening.","PeriodicalId":30016,"journal":{"name":"Financial Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3326/FINTP.40.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The paper suggests that Luhmann’s theory of social systems and evolution offers a powerful approach for analyzing law and the economy. It considers Yugoslavia and some Central European countries before and after 1990. Luhmann’s concept of evolution stands in stark contrast to mainstream economic theory. It enables us to clarify the concept of transformation. A transformation became necessary because communism was an evolutionary dead end. According to this view, in postcommunism the primacy of functional differentiation needs to be reestablished because it was partially reversed under communist rule. In these circumstances, the popular call for “sufficient†public control over the market is asking for the impossible. Post-communist law is bound to fall behind the evolution of markets. This causes economic problems and retards financial deepening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共产主义和后共产主义下法律的演变:卢曼精神下的系统理论分析
luhmann的社会系统和演化理论为分析法律和经济提供了一个强有力的方法。它考虑了1990年前后的南斯拉夫和一些中欧国家。luhmann的进化概念与主流经济理论形成鲜明对比。它使我们能够澄清转换的概念。因为共产主义是一个进化的死胡同,所以变革是必要的。根据这一观点,在后共产主义时代,功能分化的首要地位需要重新确立,因为它在共产主义统治下被部分逆转。在这种情况下,公众要求€œsufficientâ公共控制市场的呼声是不可能的。后共产主义时代的法律注定要落后于市场的发展。这导致了经济问题,阻碍了金融深化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Addendum: In search of the egalitarian syndrome: cultural inertia in Croatia? List of articles published in “Financial Theory and Practice”, vol. 40, 2016 In search of the egalitarian syndrome: cultural inertia in Croatia? Accumulating approach to the life-cycle pension model: practical advantages The impact of population aging on public finance in the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1