BIRD SPECIES’ REPONSES TO POST MINE RECLAMATION IN ALABAMA – A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

Richard R. Borthwick, Yong Wang
{"title":"BIRD SPECIES’ REPONSES TO POST MINE RECLAMATION IN ALABAMA – A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS","authors":"Richard R. Borthwick, Yong Wang","doi":"10.21000/JASMR15020001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Surface mining transforms landscapes and ecosystem functions through the removal of vegetation and soil. Losses of vegetation correlate with declines, displacement, and transformations of songbird communities. Mine reclamation is a legislative requirement that can influence wildlife communities. The purpose of this study was to examine the avian community responses to mine reclamation practices and, as a proxy, assess the potential benefits and limitations of current reclamation approaches. Avian point counts were carried out at 202 plots on mined and surrounding non-mined areas throughout the Shale Hills Region of Alabama. These mines were reclaimed across a 26 year time-frame and using a variety of reclamation techniques. Six of the thirty-six bird species observed in high enough densities for detailed analysis showed differences of interest between reclaimed and random non-mined sites. Two species showed negative density responses: Carolina Chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), Hooded Warblers (Setophaga citrina). Conversely, densities of Field Sparrows (Spizella pusilla), Gray Catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis), Pine Warblers (Setophaga pinus), and Prairie Warblers (Setophaga discolor) responded positively to mine reclamation. We found that most mine reclamation in the Shale Hills Region of Alabama tended to shift habitat towards open canopy, edge, and grassland habitats. Though our study area tended to have fairly open forest structures (average basal areas around 13 m 2 /ha and average canopy closures around 50%), species that responded negatively were often associated with older sites with more closed canopies. Reclamation techniques should incorporate diverse canopy vegetation and thick mid-story cover to promote more complex vertical forest structure.","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15020001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. Surface mining transforms landscapes and ecosystem functions through the removal of vegetation and soil. Losses of vegetation correlate with declines, displacement, and transformations of songbird communities. Mine reclamation is a legislative requirement that can influence wildlife communities. The purpose of this study was to examine the avian community responses to mine reclamation practices and, as a proxy, assess the potential benefits and limitations of current reclamation approaches. Avian point counts were carried out at 202 plots on mined and surrounding non-mined areas throughout the Shale Hills Region of Alabama. These mines were reclaimed across a 26 year time-frame and using a variety of reclamation techniques. Six of the thirty-six bird species observed in high enough densities for detailed analysis showed differences of interest between reclaimed and random non-mined sites. Two species showed negative density responses: Carolina Chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), Hooded Warblers (Setophaga citrina). Conversely, densities of Field Sparrows (Spizella pusilla), Gray Catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis), Pine Warblers (Setophaga pinus), and Prairie Warblers (Setophaga discolor) responded positively to mine reclamation. We found that most mine reclamation in the Shale Hills Region of Alabama tended to shift habitat towards open canopy, edge, and grassland habitats. Though our study area tended to have fairly open forest structures (average basal areas around 13 m 2 /ha and average canopy closures around 50%), species that responded negatively were often associated with older sites with more closed canopies. Reclamation techniques should incorporate diverse canopy vegetation and thick mid-story cover to promote more complex vertical forest structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉巴马州鸟类对矿山开垦后的反应——初步分析
摘要露天采矿通过去除植被和土壤来改变景观和生态系统功能。植被的损失与鸣禽群落的减少、迁移和转变有关。矿山复垦是一项可能影响野生动物群落的立法要求。本研究的目的是研究鸟类群落对矿山复垦做法的反应,并以此作为代理,评估当前复垦方法的潜在利益和局限性。在阿拉巴马州页岩山地区的202个矿区和周围非矿区进行了鸟类点计数。这些矿山在26年的时间内采用了各种复垦技术进行复垦。在36种密度足够高的鸟类中,有6种可以进行详细分析,它们的兴趣在填海和随机的非采矿地点之间存在差异。卡罗来纳山雀(Poecile carolinensis)和冠林莺(Setophaga citrina)均表现出负密度响应。相反,野麻雀(Spizella pusilla)、灰猫鸟(Dumetella carolinensis)、松林莺(Setophaga pinus)和草原莺(Setophaga discolor)的密度对矿山复垦有积极的响应。研究发现,在美国阿拉巴马州页岩丘陵地区,大多数矿山开垦都倾向于向开阔的林冠、边缘和草地生境转移。虽然我们的研究区域往往具有相当开放的森林结构(平均基底面积约为13 m2 /ha,平均冠层封闭度约为50%),但响应为负的物种通常与冠层封闭程度较高的老样地相关。复垦技术应结合不同的冠层植被和较厚的中层植被,以促进更复杂的垂直森林结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success Based on Spatial Soil Properties PENNSYLVANIA’S ABANDONED MINE LAND (AML) EMERGENCY PROGRAM THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF A COAL REFUSE PILE RECLAMATION PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD SAMARITAN PROGRAM DIMENSIONS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LAND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANNING AND DESIGN: A PORTUGESE CASE STUDY CONCERNING PUBLIC PERCEPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1