Effect of Toxin Binder on Productive Performance of Lactating Friesian Cows

A. Mehany, A. Shams
{"title":"Effect of Toxin Binder on Productive Performance of Lactating Friesian Cows","authors":"A. Mehany, A. Shams","doi":"10.21608/jappmu.2019.82461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty Friesian cows with an average weight of 540  17.59 kg and running on 2nd to 5th lactating season were used at 60 days before calving and continued up to 120 days of lactation feeding trial to study the effect of toxin binder (bentonite and zeolite) on Productive Performance of Lactating Cows. Cows were randomly divided into four similar groups (n = 3). All cows were received basal rations (BR) that consists of concentrate feed mixture (CFM), corn silage (CS) and rice straw (RS). Group 1 received (BR) without supplement and served as control rations, whereas groups G2, G3 and G4 received control diet plus 2% Bentonite, 1% Bentonite plus 1% Zeolite or 2% Zeolite of DM intake as tested rations, respectively. Results showed that, supplemented groups were significant (P˂0.05) higher intake of total DM, TDN and DCP than unsuplemented group. Also on the same trend, the concentrations of pH and TVFA's were increased significantly (P˂0.05), while ammonia-N decreased significantly (P˂0.05) in supplemented groups compared to G1. Group 2 recorded significantly (P˂0.05) the highest concentrations of total protein, globulin, glucose and T3 and followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the lowest values. While, albumin concentration decreased significantly (P˂0.05) with bentonite and zeolite additives. While, the concentrations of creatinine, urea, total lipid and Ca as well as the activity of AST and ALT were nearly similar for the different groups. Yield of actual milk and 4% FCM were significantly (P˂0.05) higher in G2 than those of G4 and G1, And no significant higher than G3 ration: G2 showed significantly (P˂0.05) the highest contents of fat, protein, lactose, SNF and TS, while G1 had the lowest values. Ash content in milk was nearly similar for the different groups. Bentonite and zeolite supplementation improved feed conversion, and G2 recorded the best one. The difference were only significant between bentonite ration (G2) and the control one (G1). Group2 recorded the highest daily feed cost, output of 4% FCM yield, net revenue and economic efficiency followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the lowest feed cost, net revenue and economic efficiency, while feed cost per one kg 4% FCM was lower significantly (P˂0.05) with G2 followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the highest value. In conclusion, bentonite supplement for lactating Friesian cows at the level of 2% of DM intake as toxin binder had the best positive effect on digestibility, rumen fermentation, some blood parameters, feed intake, milk yield and composition, feed conversion and economic efficiency, comparison with other supplemented rations and the control one (unsupplemented).","PeriodicalId":14889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal and Poultry Production","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal and Poultry Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jappmu.2019.82461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Twenty Friesian cows with an average weight of 540  17.59 kg and running on 2nd to 5th lactating season were used at 60 days before calving and continued up to 120 days of lactation feeding trial to study the effect of toxin binder (bentonite and zeolite) on Productive Performance of Lactating Cows. Cows were randomly divided into four similar groups (n = 3). All cows were received basal rations (BR) that consists of concentrate feed mixture (CFM), corn silage (CS) and rice straw (RS). Group 1 received (BR) without supplement and served as control rations, whereas groups G2, G3 and G4 received control diet plus 2% Bentonite, 1% Bentonite plus 1% Zeolite or 2% Zeolite of DM intake as tested rations, respectively. Results showed that, supplemented groups were significant (P˂0.05) higher intake of total DM, TDN and DCP than unsuplemented group. Also on the same trend, the concentrations of pH and TVFA's were increased significantly (P˂0.05), while ammonia-N decreased significantly (P˂0.05) in supplemented groups compared to G1. Group 2 recorded significantly (P˂0.05) the highest concentrations of total protein, globulin, glucose and T3 and followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the lowest values. While, albumin concentration decreased significantly (P˂0.05) with bentonite and zeolite additives. While, the concentrations of creatinine, urea, total lipid and Ca as well as the activity of AST and ALT were nearly similar for the different groups. Yield of actual milk and 4% FCM were significantly (P˂0.05) higher in G2 than those of G4 and G1, And no significant higher than G3 ration: G2 showed significantly (P˂0.05) the highest contents of fat, protein, lactose, SNF and TS, while G1 had the lowest values. Ash content in milk was nearly similar for the different groups. Bentonite and zeolite supplementation improved feed conversion, and G2 recorded the best one. The difference were only significant between bentonite ration (G2) and the control one (G1). Group2 recorded the highest daily feed cost, output of 4% FCM yield, net revenue and economic efficiency followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the lowest feed cost, net revenue and economic efficiency, while feed cost per one kg 4% FCM was lower significantly (P˂0.05) with G2 followed by G3 and G4, while G1 had the highest value. In conclusion, bentonite supplement for lactating Friesian cows at the level of 2% of DM intake as toxin binder had the best positive effect on digestibility, rumen fermentation, some blood parameters, feed intake, milk yield and composition, feed conversion and economic efficiency, comparison with other supplemented rations and the control one (unsupplemented).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毒素粘结剂对泌乳奶牛生产性能的影响
选取20头平均体重为54017.59 kg、泌乳期第2 ~ 5天的弗里斯马奶牛,从产犊前60天开始持续饲喂至泌乳期120天,研究毒素黏合剂(膨润土和沸石)对泌乳奶牛生产性能的影响。奶牛随机分为4组(n = 3),均饲喂由精料混合料(CFM)、玉米青贮料(CS)和稻草(RS)组成的基础日粮(BR)。1组不添加BR,作为对照日粮;G2、G3和G4组分别饲喂对照日粮+ 2%膨润土、1%膨润土+ 1%沸石和2%沸石的DM饲粮。结果表明,与未添加组相比,添加组总干物质、总总脂肪和总粗蛋白质的摄取量显著增加(P小于0.05)。与G1相比,各添加组的pH和TVFA浓度显著升高(P小于0.05),氨氮浓度显著降低(P小于0.05)。2组总蛋白、球蛋白、葡萄糖和T3含量显著(P值小于0.05)最高,G3和G4次之,G1最低。添加膨润土和沸石后,白蛋白浓度显著降低(P值小于0.05)。而各组肌酐、尿素、总脂、钙浓度及谷丙转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶活性基本一致。G2的实际产奶量和4% FCM显著(P小于0.05)高于G4和G1,但不显著高于G3;脂肪、蛋白质、乳糖、SNF和TS含量显著(P小于0.05)高于G2, G1最低。牛奶中的灰分含量在不同组中几乎是相似的。添加膨润土和沸石提高了饲料转化率,以G2为最佳。膨润土日粮(G2)与对照日粮(G1)之间差异不显著。组2的日饲料成本、4% FCM产量、净收益和经济效益最高,G3和G4次之,G1的饲料成本、净收益和经济效益最低,而每千克4% FCM饲料成本显著低于组2 (P小于0.05),G3和G4次之,G1最高。综上所述,与其他添加日粮和对照日粮(未添加)相比,添加2% DM水平的膨润土作为毒素结合剂对泌乳奶牛的消化率、瘤胃发酵、部分血液参数、采食量、产奶量和成分、饲料系数和经济效益均有最佳的正向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Tied and Free Housing Systems on Behavioural Activities and Welfare of Egyptian Buffalo Heifers Effect of Marjoram Leaves Extract on Performances, Blood Indices, Digestive Enzymes, Immunity, Antioxidant and Microbial Population of Growing Japanese Quails Impact of Dietary Calcium Nano-Particles on Productive Performance, Carcass Yield, Blood Parameters, Immune-Status and Tibia Structure Of Broiler Chicks Semen quality, sperm variables, blood profile, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of Sinai cockers fed diet supplemented with vitamin E or/and pumpkin seed oil Effect of Thyme Aqueous Extract on Reproductive Performance, Blood Constituents, Antioxidant Status, and Immunity of Gimmizah Chicken
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1