Direct oral anticoagulant use and thrombus detection in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension referred for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy

Ina Jeong, T. Fernandes, M. Alotaibi, N. Kim
{"title":"Direct oral anticoagulant use and thrombus detection in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension referred for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy","authors":"Ina Jeong, T. Fernandes, M. Alotaibi, N. Kim","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be on lifelong, effective anticoagulant therapy. The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in CTEPH is unknown. Aim: To evaluate the trend of DOAC usage and correlation with subacute thrombus detection at time of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 405 consecutive pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) cases at the University of California, San Diego from July 2015 through July 2017. The PTE specimen were reviewed for the presence of acute or subacute thrombotic material removed at the time of PTE. Results: Of 405 consecutive PTE cases, 239 (59.0%) presented on either oral vitamin-K antagonist or chronic injectable therapy; 166 patients (41%) were anticoagulated with DOACs. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between DOAC and non-DOAC groups. Evidence of acute or subacute thrombi was observed in 16 (6.7%) within the non-DOAC group versus 22 (13.3%) in the DOAC group. The odds ratio (OR) of DOACs usage and evidence of recent thrombosis was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.09-5.01, p=0.028) after adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Conclusions: CTEPH patients referred for PTE while on DOAC therapy were twice as likely to have associated acute or subacute thrombi removed at the time of surgery compared with those on conventional anticoagulant therapies. This raises questions of safety and efficacy of DOACs in the chronic treatment of CTEPH. A formal study of DOACs in the management of CTEPH is indicated.","PeriodicalId":20724,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary hypertension","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be on lifelong, effective anticoagulant therapy. The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in CTEPH is unknown. Aim: To evaluate the trend of DOAC usage and correlation with subacute thrombus detection at time of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 405 consecutive pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) cases at the University of California, San Diego from July 2015 through July 2017. The PTE specimen were reviewed for the presence of acute or subacute thrombotic material removed at the time of PTE. Results: Of 405 consecutive PTE cases, 239 (59.0%) presented on either oral vitamin-K antagonist or chronic injectable therapy; 166 patients (41%) were anticoagulated with DOACs. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between DOAC and non-DOAC groups. Evidence of acute or subacute thrombi was observed in 16 (6.7%) within the non-DOAC group versus 22 (13.3%) in the DOAC group. The odds ratio (OR) of DOACs usage and evidence of recent thrombosis was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.09-5.01, p=0.028) after adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Conclusions: CTEPH patients referred for PTE while on DOAC therapy were twice as likely to have associated acute or subacute thrombi removed at the time of surgery compared with those on conventional anticoagulant therapies. This raises questions of safety and efficacy of DOACs in the chronic treatment of CTEPH. A formal study of DOACs in the management of CTEPH is indicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接口服抗凝剂使用和血栓检测慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者转介肺血栓动脉内膜切除术
背景:慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者应终生接受有效的抗凝治疗。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗CTEPH的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。目的:评价肺血栓动脉内膜切除术时DOAC的使用趋势及其与亚急性血栓检测的相关性。方法:我们对2015年7月至2017年7月在加州大学圣地亚哥分校进行的405例连续肺血栓动脉内膜切除术(PTE)进行回顾性分析。结果:405例PTE患者中,239例(59.0%)接受了口服维生素k拮抗剂或慢性注射治疗;166例患者(41%)采用DOACs抗凝治疗。DOAC组和非DOAC组的基线特征无显著差异。非DOAC组有16例(6.7%)患者出现急性或亚急性血栓,DOAC组有22例(13.3%)患者出现血栓。在调整年龄、性别、种族、BMI和抗磷脂抗体综合征史后,DOACs使用与近期血栓形成证据的比值比(OR)为2.34 (95% CI, 1.09-5.01, p=0.028)。结论:与接受常规抗凝治疗的患者相比,接受DOAC治疗的CTEPH患者在手术时清除相关急性或亚急性血栓的可能性是接受常规抗凝治疗的患者的两倍。这就提出了doac在慢性治疗CTEPH中的安全性和有效性问题。建议对DOACs在CTEPH治疗中的作用进行正式研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary In Vitro Perfusion (PIPE) Model to Study Cellular Crosstalk in Neonatal Pulmonary Vascular Disease Inhibtion of histone deacetylase activity reduces pulmonary vascular remodeling and inflammtion in experimental pulmonary hypertension Estrogen and progestin induce the migration of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells with the contractile phenotype via different mechanisms Right ventricular function and lung perfusion in adaptive versus maladaptive experimental pulmonary hypertension In vitro effects of vasodilatory drugs on BMPR2-silenced pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1