Psychometric Evaluation of the ProQOL Version 5 for Assessing Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nurses

J. Hagan
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the ProQOL Version 5 for Assessing Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nurses","authors":"J. Hagan","doi":"10.20849/IJSN.V4I3.620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Professional Quality of Life scale is commonly used to measure Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses despite a lack of research regarding its psychometric properties in this population. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the ProQOL version 5 in nurses.Methods: Chronbach’s alpha was used to assess reliability and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to test the validity of the three factor structure.Results: Reliability of the Burnout subscale is poor in nurses (α=.53). Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the tool’s three factor structure to not be valid in the nursing population (p<.001).Discussion: Despite being widely used, the ProQOL is not a valid or reliable tool in the nursing population. Recommendations are provided for creating a new tool to measure Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses.Contribution of the Paper:What is already known about the topic:Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction are important to study in the nursing population since these constructs can affect job performance and patient safety.By assessing nurses’ Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction, targeted interventions can be created to enhance work efficiency and enjoyment, thereby improving nurse job satisfaction, nurse retention and patient outcomes.What this paper adds:Despite being commonly used in the nursing population, the ProQOL is not a valid or reliable tool for measuring Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses.A new tool for measuring Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses is needed.","PeriodicalId":93573,"journal":{"name":"International journal of studies in nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of studies in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/IJSN.V4I3.620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The Professional Quality of Life scale is commonly used to measure Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses despite a lack of research regarding its psychometric properties in this population. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the ProQOL version 5 in nurses.Methods: Chronbach’s alpha was used to assess reliability and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to test the validity of the three factor structure.Results: Reliability of the Burnout subscale is poor in nurses (α=.53). Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the tool’s three factor structure to not be valid in the nursing population (p<.001).Discussion: Despite being widely used, the ProQOL is not a valid or reliable tool in the nursing population. Recommendations are provided for creating a new tool to measure Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses.Contribution of the Paper:What is already known about the topic:Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction are important to study in the nursing population since these constructs can affect job performance and patient safety.By assessing nurses’ Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction, targeted interventions can be created to enhance work efficiency and enjoyment, thereby improving nurse job satisfaction, nurse retention and patient outcomes.What this paper adds:Despite being commonly used in the nursing population, the ProQOL is not a valid or reliable tool for measuring Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses.A new tool for measuring Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Compassion Satisfaction in nurses is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ProQOL第5版护士同情心满意度、职业倦怠和继发性创伤应激的心理测量学评价
背景:职业生活质量量表通常用于测量护士的职业倦怠、继发性创伤压力和同情满意度,尽管缺乏关于该人群心理测量特性的研究。本研究评估了ProQOL第5版在护士中的信度和效度。方法:采用Chronbach’s alpha法评估信度,采用验证性因子分析检验三因素结构的效度。结果:护士职业倦怠量表的信度较差(α= 0.53)。验证性因子分析显示,该工具的三因素结构在护理人群中不有效(p< 0.001)。讨论:尽管ProQOL被广泛使用,但它在护理人群中并不是一个有效或可靠的工具。为创建新的工具来测量护士的职业倦怠、继发性创伤应激和同情满意度提供了建议。论文贡献:什么是已经知道的主题:倦怠,继发性创伤压力和同情满意度是重要的研究护理人群,因为这些结构可以影响工作绩效和患者安全。通过评估护士的职业倦怠、继发性创伤应激和同情满意度,可以制定有针对性的干预措施,提高工作效率和享受,从而提高护士的工作满意度、护士留任率和患者预后。本文补充:尽管ProQOL在护理人群中被广泛使用,但它并不是一种有效或可靠的测量护士倦怠、继发性创伤压力和同情满意度的工具。需要一种新的工具来测量护士的职业倦怠、继发性创伤压力和同情满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spiritual Needs of Older Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Concept Analysis Application of the Transtheoretical Model to Physical Activity and Health-related Quality of Life Among Older People Living With Frailty in the Community: The Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors (FANS) Study Protocol Creating a Class Plan to Strengthen Marital Relationships During Pregnancy in Japan The Efficacy of Providing Holistic Wellness Activities in Promoting Nursing Student Self-care Trauma-Informed Care Approach in Family Practice: Steps to Implementing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1