EmptyHeaded

Christopher R. Aberger, Andrew Lamb, Susan Tu, Andres Nötzli, K. Olukotun, C. Ré
{"title":"EmptyHeaded","authors":"Christopher R. Aberger, Andrew Lamb, Susan Tu, Andres Nötzli, K. Olukotun, C. Ré","doi":"10.1145/3129246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two types of high-performance graph processing engines: low- and high-level engines. Low-level engines (Galois, PowerGraph, Snap) provide optimized data structures and computation models but require users to write low-level imperative code, hence ensuring that efficiency is the burden of the user. In high-level engines, users write in query languages like datalog (SociaLite) or SQL (Grail). High-level engines are easier to use but are orders of magnitude slower than the low-level graph engines. We present EmptyHeaded, a high-level engine that supports a rich datalog-like query language and achieves performance comparable to that of low-level engines. At the core of EmptyHeaded’s design is a new class of join algorithms that satisfy strong theoretical guarantees, but have thus far not achieved performance comparable to that of specialized graph processing engines. To achieve high performance, EmptyHeaded introduces a new join engine architecture, including a novel query optimizer and execution engine that leverage single-instruction multiple data (SIMD) parallelism. With this architecture, EmptyHeaded outperforms high-level approaches by up to three orders of magnitude on graph pattern queries, PageRank, and Single-Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) and is an order of magnitude faster than many low-level baselines. We validate that EmptyHeaded competes with the best-of-breed low-level engine (Galois), achieving comparable performance on PageRank and at most 3× worse performance on SSSP. Finally, we show that the EmptyHeaded design can easily be extended to accommodate a standard resource description framework (RDF) workload, the LUBM benchmark. On the LUBM benchmark, we show that EmptyHeaded can compete with and sometimes outperform two high-level, but specialized RDF baselines (TripleBit and RDF-3X), while outperforming MonetDB by up to three orders of magnitude and LogicBlox by up to two orders of magnitude.","PeriodicalId":6983,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3129246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

There are two types of high-performance graph processing engines: low- and high-level engines. Low-level engines (Galois, PowerGraph, Snap) provide optimized data structures and computation models but require users to write low-level imperative code, hence ensuring that efficiency is the burden of the user. In high-level engines, users write in query languages like datalog (SociaLite) or SQL (Grail). High-level engines are easier to use but are orders of magnitude slower than the low-level graph engines. We present EmptyHeaded, a high-level engine that supports a rich datalog-like query language and achieves performance comparable to that of low-level engines. At the core of EmptyHeaded’s design is a new class of join algorithms that satisfy strong theoretical guarantees, but have thus far not achieved performance comparable to that of specialized graph processing engines. To achieve high performance, EmptyHeaded introduces a new join engine architecture, including a novel query optimizer and execution engine that leverage single-instruction multiple data (SIMD) parallelism. With this architecture, EmptyHeaded outperforms high-level approaches by up to three orders of magnitude on graph pattern queries, PageRank, and Single-Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) and is an order of magnitude faster than many low-level baselines. We validate that EmptyHeaded competes with the best-of-breed low-level engine (Galois), achieving comparable performance on PageRank and at most 3× worse performance on SSSP. Finally, we show that the EmptyHeaded design can easily be extended to accommodate a standard resource description framework (RDF) workload, the LUBM benchmark. On the LUBM benchmark, we show that EmptyHeaded can compete with and sometimes outperform two high-level, but specialized RDF baselines (TripleBit and RDF-3X), while outperforming MonetDB by up to three orders of magnitude and LogicBlox by up to two orders of magnitude.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EmptyHeaded
有两种类型的高性能图形处理引擎:低级引擎和高级引擎。低级引擎(Galois, PowerGraph, Snap)提供优化的数据结构和计算模型,但要求用户编写低级命令式代码,因此确保效率是用户的负担。在高级引擎中,用户使用诸如datalog (SociaLite)或SQL (Grail)之类的查询语言编写。高级引擎更容易使用,但比低级图形引擎慢几个数量级。我们提出了emptyheading,这是一个高级引擎,它支持丰富的类似数据的查询语言,并实现了与低级引擎相当的性能。emptyhead设计的核心是一类新的连接算法,它满足了强大的理论保证,但迄今为止还没有达到与专门的图形处理引擎相媲美的性能。为了实现高性能,emptyheading引入了一个新的连接引擎架构,包括一个新的查询优化器和利用单指令多数据(SIMD)并行性的执行引擎。使用这种体系结构,emptyheading在图模式查询、PageRank和单源最短路径(SSSP)上的性能比高级方法高出三个数量级,并且比许多低级基线快一个数量级。我们验证了EmptyHeaded与同类中最好的低级引擎(Galois)竞争,在PageRank上取得了相当的性能,在SSSP上的性能最多差3倍。最后,我们展示了可以很容易地扩展EmptyHeaded设计,以适应标准资源描述框架(RDF)工作负载,即LUBM基准。在LUBM基准测试中,我们展示了emptyheading可以与两个高级但专门的RDF基线(TripleBit和RDF- 3x)竞争,有时甚至优于它们,同时比MonetDB和LogicBlox的性能分别高出三个数量级和两个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Finding Rank Regret Representatives Answering (Unions of) Conjunctive Queries using Random Access and Random-Order Enumeration Persistent Summaries Influence Maximization Revisited: Efficient Sampling with Bound Tightened The Space-Efficient Core of Vadalog
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1