Use of fenestrated stent grafts in treatment of acute aortic syndrome.

T N Khafizov, I A Idrisov, V V Kataev, I E Nikolaeva, T E Imaev, E E Abkhalikova, I E Yamanaeva
{"title":"Use of fenestrated stent grafts in treatment of acute aortic syndrome.","authors":"T N Khafizov, I A Idrisov, V V Kataev, I E Nikolaeva, T E Imaev, E E Abkhalikova, I E Yamanaeva","doi":"10.33029/1027-6661-2022-28-3-56-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the possibility and determine the safety of using stent grafts with on table and in situ fenestration in patients with acute aortic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From 2019 to 2021, specialists of the Republican Cardiological Center (Ufa) retrospectively analyzed the results of endovascular treatment of 34 patients with acute aortic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>All 34 patients were operated on within the first 48 hours after the disease was detected. They were subjected to various types of endovascular debranching. In 26 patients, zone 2 according to Ishimaru was selected with on table or in situ TEVAR (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair) of the left subclavian artery; in 6 cases, double fenestration of the left common carotid and left subclavian arteries were performed during implantation into zone 1 according to Ishimaru. In 2 cases, total endovascular debranching was performed during implantation into zone 0 according to Ishimaru. The average operation time was 137.35±61.4 minutes, the average contrast consumption was 295.2±79.2 ml, and the average volume of blood loss was 78±121.1 ml. In all cases, the technical success was 100%, however, during the control MSCT, 2 cases of type 3 endoleaks were identified, which were further embolized. One patient developed retrograde dissection of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch 2 months after surgery. Further surgical correction was performed. Overall in-hospital mortality was 0%, and only 3 (8.8%) patients died in the remote period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the aortic arch with various types of endovascular debranching can be considered as an alternative and effective method for treatment of patients with acute aortic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7821,"journal":{"name":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"56-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2022-28-3-56-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the possibility and determine the safety of using stent grafts with on table and in situ fenestration in patients with acute aortic syndrome.

Patients and methods: From 2019 to 2021, specialists of the Republican Cardiological Center (Ufa) retrospectively analyzed the results of endovascular treatment of 34 patients with acute aortic syndrome.

Results and discussion: All 34 patients were operated on within the first 48 hours after the disease was detected. They were subjected to various types of endovascular debranching. In 26 patients, zone 2 according to Ishimaru was selected with on table or in situ TEVAR (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair) of the left subclavian artery; in 6 cases, double fenestration of the left common carotid and left subclavian arteries were performed during implantation into zone 1 according to Ishimaru. In 2 cases, total endovascular debranching was performed during implantation into zone 0 according to Ishimaru. The average operation time was 137.35±61.4 minutes, the average contrast consumption was 295.2±79.2 ml, and the average volume of blood loss was 78±121.1 ml. In all cases, the technical success was 100%, however, during the control MSCT, 2 cases of type 3 endoleaks were identified, which were further embolized. One patient developed retrograde dissection of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch 2 months after surgery. Further surgical correction was performed. Overall in-hospital mortality was 0%, and only 3 (8.8%) patients died in the remote period.

Conclusion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the aortic arch with various types of endovascular debranching can be considered as an alternative and effective method for treatment of patients with acute aortic syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开窗支架在急性主动脉综合征治疗中的应用。
目的:探讨急性主动脉综合征患者在手术台上原位开窗支架移植的可行性及安全性。患者和方法:2019 - 2021年,共和心脏病中心(Ufa)的专家回顾性分析了34例急性主动脉综合征患者的血管内治疗结果。结果与讨论:34例患者均在发现病变后48小时内手术。它们遭受不同类型的血管内分支脱支。在26例患者中,根据Ishimaru选择2区,对左侧锁骨下动脉进行手术台上或原位TEVAR(胸椎血管内主动脉修复术);6例患者在1区植入时,行左侧颈总动脉和左侧锁骨下动脉双开窗术。2例患者根据Ishimaru在0区植入时行血管内全脱支。平均手术时间137.35±61.4分钟,平均造影剂消耗295.2±79.2 ml,平均失血量78±121.1 ml。所有病例技术成功率均为100%,但在对照MSCT期间,发现2例3型内漏,并进一步栓塞。1例患者术后2个月出现升主动脉和主动脉弓逆行夹层。进一步进行手术矫正。总体住院死亡率为0%,远程期间仅有3例(8.8%)患者死亡。结论:胸椎主动脉弓血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)可作为治疗急性主动脉综合征的一种有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
[Early and mid-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with hostile proximal neck anatomy]. [Endovascular angioplasty of native arteriovenous fistulas using ultrasound navigation]. [Late surgical conversions after endoprosthetic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms]. [Long-term outcome of thoracoabdominal aortic repair for nonspecific aortoarteritis]. [Comparative study of prosthetic repair of the internal carotid artery and eversion carotid endarterectomy: long-term outcomes].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1