Evaluation of Parametric Method Performance for Left-Censored Data and Recommendation of Using for Covid-19 Data Analysis

M. Tekindal, H. Yonar, S. Kader
{"title":"Evaluation of Parametric Method Performance for Left-Censored Data and Recommendation of Using for Covid-19 Data Analysis","authors":"M. Tekindal, H. Yonar, S. Kader","doi":"10.14744/ejmo.2021.90258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"bjectives: Left-censored data, which is commonly seen in clinical studies, are frequently encountered in the litera?ture, especially in the fields of food, environment, microbiology, and biochemistry. In this study, the most appropriate distribution between the negatively skewed distributions for left-censored data in Parametric Inverse Hazard Models was tried to be determined. Methods: Within the scope of the study, firstly, the data were produced uncensored according to different parameters of each distribution. Then, simulation studies were carried out in different censorship rates (15%, 25% and 35%) and various sample sizes (1000, 2000 and 3000) in order to determine the most appropriate distribution. AIC, AICC, HQIC, and CAIC information criteria were employed to compare the distribution performances. Since it was not possible to study simulations of all possible scenarios, scenarios similar to each other were generally preferred over others. Results: In the simulation results, the most appropriate distributions to be used for left-censored data in Parametric Inverse Hazard Models were found as Generalized Inverse Weibull as well as Log-Logistic, Log-Normal, Inverse Normal and Gamma distributions. It was also detected that the Marshal-Olkin distribution revealed a superior performance compared to the Modified Weibull, Generalized Gamma, Gamma, and Flexible Weibull distributions. Log logistics dis?tribution gave the most appropriate result among the analyzed distributions in the examination made with real data application. Conclusion: The use of censored data analysis in evaluations in terms of Covid-19 is quite additive, considering that more statistical evaluation will be needed in the next period of the epidemic. Improved estimates can be obtained with this approach, especially in Covid-19 data analysis.","PeriodicalId":11831,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2021.90258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

bjectives: Left-censored data, which is commonly seen in clinical studies, are frequently encountered in the litera?ture, especially in the fields of food, environment, microbiology, and biochemistry. In this study, the most appropriate distribution between the negatively skewed distributions for left-censored data in Parametric Inverse Hazard Models was tried to be determined. Methods: Within the scope of the study, firstly, the data were produced uncensored according to different parameters of each distribution. Then, simulation studies were carried out in different censorship rates (15%, 25% and 35%) and various sample sizes (1000, 2000 and 3000) in order to determine the most appropriate distribution. AIC, AICC, HQIC, and CAIC information criteria were employed to compare the distribution performances. Since it was not possible to study simulations of all possible scenarios, scenarios similar to each other were generally preferred over others. Results: In the simulation results, the most appropriate distributions to be used for left-censored data in Parametric Inverse Hazard Models were found as Generalized Inverse Weibull as well as Log-Logistic, Log-Normal, Inverse Normal and Gamma distributions. It was also detected that the Marshal-Olkin distribution revealed a superior performance compared to the Modified Weibull, Generalized Gamma, Gamma, and Flexible Weibull distributions. Log logistics dis?tribution gave the most appropriate result among the analyzed distributions in the examination made with real data application. Conclusion: The use of censored data analysis in evaluations in terms of Covid-19 is quite additive, considering that more statistical evaluation will be needed in the next period of the epidemic. Improved estimates can be obtained with this approach, especially in Covid-19 data analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左截尾数据参数化方法性能评价及在Covid-19数据分析中的应用建议
目的:文献中经常遇到临床研究中常见的左删节数据。的确,特别是在食品、环境、微生物和生物化学领域。在本研究中,试图确定参数逆风险模型中左截尾数据负偏态分布之间的最合适分布。方法:在研究范围内,首先根据每个分布的不同参数对数据进行不删节处理。然后,在不同的审查率(15%、25%和35%)和不同的样本量(1000、2000和3000)下进行模拟研究,以确定最合适的分布。采用AIC、AICC、HQIC和CAIC信息标准比较分布性能。由于不可能研究所有可能场景的模拟,因此彼此相似的场景通常比其他场景更受欢迎。结果:在模拟结果中,对于参数逆风险模型中的左截尾数据,最合适的分布是广义逆威布尔分布、Log-Logistic分布、Log-Normal分布、逆正态分布和Gamma分布。研究还发现,与修正威布尔分布、广义威布尔分布、广义威布尔分布和柔性威布尔分布相比,marshall - olkin分布表现出更优越的性能。原木物流?在实际数据应用检验中给出了分析分布中最合适的结果。结论:考虑到下一阶段疫情需要进行更多的统计评估,在Covid-19疫情评估中使用审查数据分析具有相当的附加性。使用这种方法可以获得更好的估计,特别是在Covid-19数据分析中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-Nuclear and Rare Nuclear ANA Patterns in Indirect Immunoflourescence Testing and their Clinical Associations Association of Leucocyte Telomere Length with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Risk and Prognosis Epigenetic Code for Cell Fate During Development and Disease in Human Radio-Pathological Correlation of Suspected Malignant Thyroid Nodules using Elastography strain ratio and Bethesda Classification for Thyroid Cytopathology Linked Color Imaging and Color Analytic Model Based on Pixel Brightness for Diagnosing H. Pylori Infection in Gastric Antrum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1