Comparative Clinical and Electrometric Assessments of the Impact of Surfactants on Forearm Skin

E. Uhoda, M. Paye, G. Piérard
{"title":"Comparative Clinical and Electrometric Assessments of the Impact of Surfactants on Forearm Skin","authors":"E. Uhoda, M. Paye, G. Piérard","doi":"10.1159/000074108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surfactant-based skin care products can induce minimal to severer alterations of the human stratum corneum (SC). These changes can be conveniently assessed using electrometric devices. Four different surfactant-based solutions were applied to the forearms of 10 healthy volunteers following a soap chamber test method. The 2-day patch testing was followed by a 2-week follow-up. Clinical and instrumental assessments were performed at 7 time points. Data generated by the Corneometer® CM820, the Dermalab Moisture Module® and the Nova Dermal Phase Meter® (DPM) 9003 were compared. The significant differences between the product aggressiveness to the SC were similarly disclosed by the Corneometer and the Dermalab Moisture Module. The ranking of product aggressiveness given by the 3 devices 5 days after patch removal was similar to that given by the clinical assessment of erythema. A high level of correlation was found between the values yielded by the immediate and continuous mode assessments using the Dermalab Moisture Module with the pin probe, while the correlation was weaker with the Nova DPM. This finding may be related to the fact that the Nova DPM is influenced by the accumulation of the transepidermal water loss in the continuous mode assessment while there is no significant occlusion effect of the Dermalab Moisture pin probe that is more representative of the initial level of SC hydration. In conclusion, the Corneometer and the Dermalab Moisture Module respond similarly to changes in the SC content. This finding is different from some previous reports.","PeriodicalId":12086,"journal":{"name":"Exogenous Dermatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"64 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exogenous Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000074108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Surfactant-based skin care products can induce minimal to severer alterations of the human stratum corneum (SC). These changes can be conveniently assessed using electrometric devices. Four different surfactant-based solutions were applied to the forearms of 10 healthy volunteers following a soap chamber test method. The 2-day patch testing was followed by a 2-week follow-up. Clinical and instrumental assessments were performed at 7 time points. Data generated by the Corneometer® CM820, the Dermalab Moisture Module® and the Nova Dermal Phase Meter® (DPM) 9003 were compared. The significant differences between the product aggressiveness to the SC were similarly disclosed by the Corneometer and the Dermalab Moisture Module. The ranking of product aggressiveness given by the 3 devices 5 days after patch removal was similar to that given by the clinical assessment of erythema. A high level of correlation was found between the values yielded by the immediate and continuous mode assessments using the Dermalab Moisture Module with the pin probe, while the correlation was weaker with the Nova DPM. This finding may be related to the fact that the Nova DPM is influenced by the accumulation of the transepidermal water loss in the continuous mode assessment while there is no significant occlusion effect of the Dermalab Moisture pin probe that is more representative of the initial level of SC hydration. In conclusion, the Corneometer and the Dermalab Moisture Module respond similarly to changes in the SC content. This finding is different from some previous reports.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面活性剂对前臂皮肤影响的比较临床和电计评估
以表面活性剂为基础的护肤品可以引起人体角质层(SC)的轻微到严重的改变。这些变化可以使用电计装置方便地评估。采用肥皂箱试验方法,将四种不同的表面活性剂溶液应用于10名健康志愿者的前臂。2天补丁测试后进行2周随访。在7个时间点进行临床和仪器评估。比较了Corneometer®CM820、Dermalab Moisture Module®和Nova真皮相计®(DPM) 9003生成的数据。Corneometer和Dermalab Moisture Module同样揭示了产品对SC的侵蚀性之间的显着差异。贴片去除后5天,3种设备给出的产品侵袭性排名与红斑的临床评估相似。使用带pin探针的Dermalab湿度模块进行即时和连续模式评估所产生的值之间存在高度相关性,而与Nova DPM的相关性较弱。这一发现可能与Nova DPM在连续模式评估中受到经皮水分流失积累的影响有关,而Dermalab Moisture pin探针没有明显的遮挡作用,后者更能代表SC水化的初始水平。总之,Corneometer和Dermalab湿度模块对SC含量变化的反应相似。这一发现与之前的一些报道不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgement to Referees for Exogenous Dermatology 2004 Contents Vol. 3, 2004 Author Index Vol. 3, 2004 Is There Evidence that Geraniol Causes Allergic Contact Dermatitis? Subject Index Vol. 3, 2004
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1