The Political Economy of Brazilian Industrial Policy (2003 - 2014): Main Vectors, Shortcomings and Directions to Improve Effectiveness

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1590/DADOS.2021.64.2.235
Alexandre Queiroz Guimarães
{"title":"The Political Economy of Brazilian Industrial Policy (2003 - 2014): Main Vectors, Shortcomings and Directions to Improve Effectiveness","authors":"Alexandre Queiroz Guimarães","doi":"10.1590/DADOS.2021.64.2.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Political Economy of Brazilian Industrial Policy (2003 – 2014): Main Vectors, Shortcomings and Directions to Improve Effectiveness This paper is a study about industrial policy and its role in development, investigating how it was recently adopted in Brazil. After a decade of neoliberalism, industrial policy returned to the agenda, increasing the interest in its evaluation. Initially, the article explores general matters related to the needs for industrial policy and to the required factors and procedures that contribute to successful implementation. A benchmark is created to interpret the Brazilian experience. Despite its prioritization and the achievement of specific advances, industrial policy in Brazil failed to produce more consistent results. The main reasons include the lack of an appropriate coordination structure, the incapacity to focus on clear productivity and competitiveness targets, the excessive number of sectors contemplated, the lack of any consistent evaluation and the inability to achieve an encompassing negotiation with business representatives. These deficiencies weakened the possibility of addressing the serious shortcomings inherent to Brazilian industry.","PeriodicalId":51809,"journal":{"name":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/DADOS.2021.64.2.235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Political Economy of Brazilian Industrial Policy (2003 – 2014): Main Vectors, Shortcomings and Directions to Improve Effectiveness This paper is a study about industrial policy and its role in development, investigating how it was recently adopted in Brazil. After a decade of neoliberalism, industrial policy returned to the agenda, increasing the interest in its evaluation. Initially, the article explores general matters related to the needs for industrial policy and to the required factors and procedures that contribute to successful implementation. A benchmark is created to interpret the Brazilian experience. Despite its prioritization and the achievement of specific advances, industrial policy in Brazil failed to produce more consistent results. The main reasons include the lack of an appropriate coordination structure, the incapacity to focus on clear productivity and competitiveness targets, the excessive number of sectors contemplated, the lack of any consistent evaluation and the inability to achieve an encompassing negotiation with business representatives. These deficiencies weakened the possibility of addressing the serious shortcomings inherent to Brazilian industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西产业政策的政治经济学(2003 - 2014):主要载体、缺陷和提高有效性的方向
巴西产业政策的政治经济学(2003 - 2014):主要载体,缺点和方向,以提高有效性本文是一项关于产业政策及其在发展中的作用的研究,调查它是如何最近在巴西采用的。经过十年的新自由主义,产业政策重新回到了议程上,对其评估的兴趣增加了。首先,本文探讨了与工业政策的需要以及有助于成功实施的必要因素和程序有关的一般问题。建立一个基准来解释巴西的经验。尽管确定了优先次序并取得了具体进展,但巴西的工业政策未能产生更一致的结果。主要原因包括缺乏适当的协调结构,无法集中注意明确的生产力和竞争力指标,所考虑的部门过多,缺乏任何一致的评价,以及无法与商业代表进行全面的谈判。这些缺陷削弱了解决巴西工业固有的严重缺陷的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais is a quarterly publication of the Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro (IUPERJ) aiming at publishing original articles in the area of social sciences. IUPERJ is the social sciences research organ of the Universidade Candido Mendes - UCAM. Opinions and concepdados expressed in signed articles are exclusive responsibility of the authors. Published from 1966, the journal"s abbreviated title is Dados, the form that should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Bancada Feminina e o Aborto: Os Pronunciamentos das Mulheres na Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil e do Uruguai Distinções, Mediações Excludentes e Desigualdades: a Governança da Saúde Reprodutiva de “Cadastradas Difíceis” Preferências e Politização do Judiciário no Brasil Contemporâneo: Uma Análise de Casos de Combate à Corrupção Arranjo Federativo e Desigualdades em Saúde no Brasil e na Argentina Geo-Politizando los Espacios Intermedios del Sistema-Mundo: Semicentros y Semiperiferias, Geoestrategias de Subordinación y de Autonomía en América Latina y Europa Meridional tras la Guerra Fría
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1