Job involvement and valuation of job resources: The mediating effect of satisfaction with job resources

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Intangible Capital Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.3926/ic.2208
Alfonso J. Gil, J. Cegarra-Navarro, Claudia Tobias, Claudia Marin-Malumbres
{"title":"Job involvement and valuation of job resources: The mediating effect of satisfaction with job resources","authors":"Alfonso J. Gil, J. Cegarra-Navarro, Claudia Tobias, Claudia Marin-Malumbres","doi":"10.3926/ic.2208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper has two objectives: the first, to analyse the relationship between job involvement and valuation of job resources; the second, to analyse the mediating effect of satisfaction with job resources on the relationship between job involvement and employees’ valuation of job resources.Design/methodology/approach: The survey was used as a research methodology. The participants correspond to a sample of 225 employees in Spain.Findings: The hypotheses are positively contrasted. Job involvement is positively related to valuation of job resources, and satisfaction with job resources mediates the relationship between job involvement and valuation of job resources. The results of this work indicate that the most involved employees give greater importance to job resources.Originality/value: This paper evidences the relationship between job involvement and the importance that employees attribute to job resources. Therefore, this research advances the job demands-resources model, as it suggests that employees’ high involvement in their job leads to greater involvement of resources, which is related to employees’ psychological contract.","PeriodicalId":45252,"journal":{"name":"Intangible Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intangible Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper has two objectives: the first, to analyse the relationship between job involvement and valuation of job resources; the second, to analyse the mediating effect of satisfaction with job resources on the relationship between job involvement and employees’ valuation of job resources.Design/methodology/approach: The survey was used as a research methodology. The participants correspond to a sample of 225 employees in Spain.Findings: The hypotheses are positively contrasted. Job involvement is positively related to valuation of job resources, and satisfaction with job resources mediates the relationship between job involvement and valuation of job resources. The results of this work indicate that the most involved employees give greater importance to job resources.Originality/value: This paper evidences the relationship between job involvement and the importance that employees attribute to job resources. Therefore, this research advances the job demands-resources model, as it suggests that employees’ high involvement in their job leads to greater involvement of resources, which is related to employees’ psychological contract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作投入与工作资源评价:工作资源满意度的中介作用
本文的研究目的:一是分析工作投入与工作资源评价的关系;第二,分析工作资源满意度对工作投入与员工工作资源评价关系的中介作用。设计/方法/方法:该调查被用作一种研究方法。参与者对应于西班牙225名员工的样本。研究结果:两种假设形成正面对比。工作投入与工作资源评价正相关,工作资源满意度在工作投入与工作资源评价的关系中起中介作用。研究结果表明,参与程度最高的员工对工作资源的重视程度更高。独创性/价值:本研究证明了工作投入与员工对工作资源的重视程度之间的关系。因此,本研究提出了工作需求-资源模型,即员工对工作的高投入会导致资源的高投入,而资源的高投入与员工的心理契约有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intangible Capital
Intangible Capital MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Intangible Capital is to publish theoretical and empirical articles that contribute to contrast, extend and build theories that contribute to advance our understanding of phenomena related with management, and the management of intangibles, in organizations, from the perspectives of strategic management, human resource management, psychology, education, IT, supply chain management and accounting. The scientific research in management is grounded on theories developed from perspectives taken from a diversity of social sciences. Intangible Capital is open to publish articles that, from sociology, psychology, economics and industrial organization contribute to the scientific development of management and organizational science. Intangible Capital publishes scholar articles that contribute to contrast existing theories, or to build new theoretical approaches. The contributions can adopt confirmatory (quantitative) or explanatory (mainly qualitative) methodological approaches. Theoretical essays that enhance the building or extension of theoretical approaches are also welcome. Intangible Capital selects the articles to be published with a double bind, peer review system, following the practices of good scholarly journals. Intangible Capital publishes three regular issues per year following an open access policy. On-line publication allows to reduce publishing costs, and to make more agile the process of reviewing and edition. Intangible Capital defends that open access publishing fosters the advance of scientific knowledge, making it available to everyone. Intangible Capital publishes articles in English, Spanish and Catalan.
期刊最新文献
Research trends in the field of organisational management: A bibliometric analysis Integral viability analysis of entrepreneurial projects in critical contexts: Application to the case of the management of a shea mill in Kumbungu, Ghana Ethical leadership and creativity in employees with University education: The moderating effect of high intensity telework Relationship among economic crisis, stock market crashes and accounting scandals Business organizations as living beings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1