Long-term outcome of surgical revascularization in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction-a population-based cohort study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivac095
Helga B Brynjarsdottir, Arni Johnsen, Alexandra A Heimisdottir, Sunna Rún Heidarsdottir, Anders Jeppsson, Martin I Sigurdsson, Tomas Gudbjartsson
{"title":"Long-term outcome of surgical revascularization in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction-a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Helga B Brynjarsdottir, Arni Johnsen, Alexandra A Heimisdottir, Sunna Rún Heidarsdottir, Anders Jeppsson, Martin I Sigurdsson, Tomas Gudbjartsson","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivac095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surgical revascularization is an established indication for patients with advanced coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Long-term outcomes for these patients are not well-defined. We studied the long-term outcomes of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent surgical revascularization in a well-defined nationwide cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study on 2005 patients that underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Iceland between 2000 and 2016. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their preoperative LVEF; LVEF ≤35% (n = 146, median LVEF 30%) and LVEF >35% (n = 1859, median LVEF 60%). Demographics and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were compared between groups along with cardiac-specific and overall survival. The median follow-up was 7.6 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographics were similar in both groups regarding age, gender and most cardiovascular risk factors. However, patients with LVEF ≤35% more often had diabetes, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a previous history of myocardial infarction. Thirty-day mortality was 4 times higher (8% vs 2%, P < 0.001) in the LVEF ≤35%-group compared to controls. Overall survival was significantly lower in the LVEF ≤35%-group compared to controls, at 1 year (87% vs. 98%, P < 0.001) and 5 years (69% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis LVEF ≤35% was linked to inferior survival with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.0 (95%-CI 1.5 - 2.6, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A good long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting can be expected for patients with reduced LVEF, however, their survival is still significantly inferior to patients with normal ventricular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":13621,"journal":{"name":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical revascularization is an established indication for patients with advanced coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Long-term outcomes for these patients are not well-defined. We studied the long-term outcomes of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent surgical revascularization in a well-defined nationwide cohort.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study on 2005 patients that underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Iceland between 2000 and 2016. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their preoperative LVEF; LVEF ≤35% (n = 146, median LVEF 30%) and LVEF >35% (n = 1859, median LVEF 60%). Demographics and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were compared between groups along with cardiac-specific and overall survival. The median follow-up was 7.6 years.

Results: Demographics were similar in both groups regarding age, gender and most cardiovascular risk factors. However, patients with LVEF ≤35% more often had diabetes, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a previous history of myocardial infarction. Thirty-day mortality was 4 times higher (8% vs 2%, P < 0.001) in the LVEF ≤35%-group compared to controls. Overall survival was significantly lower in the LVEF ≤35%-group compared to controls, at 1 year (87% vs. 98%, P < 0.001) and 5 years (69% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis LVEF ≤35% was linked to inferior survival with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.0 (95%-CI 1.5 - 2.6, p<0.001).

Conclusions: A good long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting can be expected for patients with reduced LVEF, however, their survival is still significantly inferior to patients with normal ventricular function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左心室射血分数降低患者手术血管重建的长期疗效--一项基于人群的队列研究。
目的:对于患有晚期冠状动脉疾病且左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者来说,手术血管重建是一个既定的适应症。这些患者的长期疗效尚不明确。我们对全国范围内接受手术血管重建的缺血性心肌病患者的长期疗效进行了研究:对 2000 年至 2016 年期间在冰岛接受孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术的 2005 名患者进行回顾性研究。根据术前 LVEF 将患者分为两组:LVEF ≤35%(n = 146,中位 LVEF 为 30%)和 LVEF >35%(n = 1859,中位 LVEF 为 60%)。比较了两组患者的人口统计学特征、主要心脏和脑血管不良事件以及心脏特异性存活率和总存活率。中位随访时间为 7.6 年:两组患者在年龄、性别和大多数心血管风险因素方面的人口统计学特征相似。然而,LVEF≤35%的患者更多患有糖尿病、肾功能不全、慢性阻塞性肺病和既往心肌梗死病史。30天死亡率高出4倍(8% vs 2%,P 结论:冠状动脉移植术后的长期预后良好:LVEF降低的患者在冠状动脉旁路移植术后可望获得良好的长期疗效,但其生存率仍明显低于心室功能正常的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS) publishes scientific contributions in the field of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, covering all aspects of surgery of the heart, vessels and the chest. The journal publishes a range of article types including: Best Evidence Topics; Brief Communications; Case Reports; Original Articles; State-of-the-Art; Work in Progress Report.
期刊最新文献
Local tumour residue after microwave ablation for lung cancer: a case report. Long-term outcomes of papillary muscle relocation anteriorly for functional mitral regurgitation. Postoperative aortic injury caused by a staple line formed during wedge resection of the lung. Surgical management of cardiac cystic echinococcosis in a paediatric patient: a case report. Congenital aortocaval fistula combined with patent ductus arteriosus in an infant: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1