Characterizing intensive community-based care : Use, reliability and factor structure of a generic measure

D. Roeg, L. V. D. Goor, H. Garretsen
{"title":"Characterizing intensive community-based care : Use, reliability and factor structure of a generic measure","authors":"D. Roeg, L. V. D. Goor, H. Garretsen","doi":"10.1080/17523280802020115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a need for a reliable measurement instrument to characterize intensive community-based care across different types of programs. Aims: The aim of the current study was to use and test the previously developed Intensive Community-Based Care Program Components (ICPC) Questionnaire. Method: This questionnaire was used in a census of programs throughout the Netherlands. Reliability of the a priori scales was assessed, and exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the number of scales and to re-evaluate the structure of the questionnaire. Descriptive data were calculated to characterize Dutch programs. Of the programs, 58% responded to the questionnaire. Results: Of the a priori scales, 70% were internally consistent. With factor analysis the number of scales was considerably reduced (73%), but still explaining 58% of the total variance. Conclusions: This study shows that the ICPC can be used to improve future effect studies and for international comparisons of programs.","PeriodicalId":88592,"journal":{"name":"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis","volume":"2018 1","pages":"158-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17523280802020115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: There is a need for a reliable measurement instrument to characterize intensive community-based care across different types of programs. Aims: The aim of the current study was to use and test the previously developed Intensive Community-Based Care Program Components (ICPC) Questionnaire. Method: This questionnaire was used in a census of programs throughout the Netherlands. Reliability of the a priori scales was assessed, and exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the number of scales and to re-evaluate the structure of the questionnaire. Descriptive data were calculated to characterize Dutch programs. Of the programs, 58% responded to the questionnaire. Results: Of the a priori scales, 70% were internally consistent. With factor analysis the number of scales was considerably reduced (73%), but still explaining 58% of the total variance. Conclusions: This study shows that the ICPC can be used to improve future effect studies and for international comparisons of programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区重症监护的特征:通用测量的使用、可靠性和因素结构
背景:需要一种可靠的测量工具来表征不同类型的社区重症监护项目。目的:当前研究的目的是使用和测试先前开发的社区强化护理计划组成部分(ICPC)问卷。方法:本问卷用于荷兰各地的项目普查。评估先验量表的信度,并采用探索性因子分析减少量表数量,重新评估问卷结构。描述性数据的计算是为了描述荷兰的项目。在这些项目中,58%的人回答了调查问卷。结果:70%的先验量表内部一致。通过因子分析,量表的数量大大减少(73%),但仍能解释总方差的58%。结论:本研究表明,ICPC可用于改进未来的效果研究和项目的国际比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for medication non-adherence among psychiatric patients with substance misuse histories. Contingency Management Reduces Symptoms of Psychological and Emotional Distress among Homeless, Substance-dependent Men Who Have Sex with Men. Key performance indicators for mental health and substance use disorders: a literature review and discussion paper Ethics overload: impact of excessive ethical review on comorbidity research Mental health support workers’ attitudes towards hepatitis C and injecting drug use: barriers to recovery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1