Prevalence of Chronic Cough Following COVID-19 Infection: A Cross Sectional Study

A. Iqbal Muhammad, S. Ananth, M. Shah, T. Sedighi, I. Chahal, A. Barlow, F. Chua, W.-J. Song, R. Vancheeswaran
{"title":"Prevalence of Chronic Cough Following COVID-19 Infection: A Cross Sectional Study","authors":"A. Iqbal Muhammad, S. Ananth, M. Shah, T. Sedighi, I. Chahal, A. Barlow, F. Chua, W.-J. Song, R. Vancheeswaran","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: SARS CoV-2 infection has been associated with long-term sequelae, including cough. The clinical course of chronic cough following SARS CoV-2 infection and therapies are not known. This study examined the prevalence and characteristics of chronic cough following SARS CoV-2 infection, aiming to assess its course, impact on patient well-being and predisposing factors. Methods: 113 patients were analysed as part of PREDICT UK follow up (NHS HRA: 20/HRA/2344) at 3 to 6 months (mean 152 days) after admission for a PCR positive SARS CoV2 infection. The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were examined to assess contributing mechanisms that may predispose to chronic cough (defined as >8 weeks following SARS CoV2 infection). Results: 41.5% patients did not have a cough. In contrast, 24% of patients had an acute cough (<3 weeks), 10.6% had subacute cough (3 to 8 weeks), and 21.6% had chronic cough (>8 weeks). 1.7% of patients had a pre-existing cough, unchanged following COVID-19. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are summarised in Table 1.50% of the cough group had a pre-existing lung disease (mainly airways disease), compared to 16% of patients without cough (P < 0.001). No differences in hypoxia, inflammation or infection markers (CRP) were noted between the 2 groups at admission. Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) was significantly reduced in those with cough compared with the non-cough group (32.2% vs 57.7%;P = 0.02). No significant differences in cough was noted between patients treated with different ventilator support strategies i.e. ITU and CPAP vs simple oxygen supplementation. Conclusions: This study notes a prevalence of chronic cough in 21.6% of patients post COVID-19. This was not associated with airway obstruction, reducing the likelihood of post infective bronchoconstriction. There was a significant reduction in DLCO consistent with post-infective interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study has looked at first-wave patients where dexamethasone was minimally used. Future studies reviewing cough with steroids therapy in patients requiring oxygen supplementation may note reduced levels of chronic cough. The use of cough as marker of post- COVID ILD warrants investigation. The current findings are in keeping with previous reports in SARS and MERS, where DLCO impairments were noted with time resolution of up to two years.","PeriodicalId":23203,"journal":{"name":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: SARS CoV-2 infection has been associated with long-term sequelae, including cough. The clinical course of chronic cough following SARS CoV-2 infection and therapies are not known. This study examined the prevalence and characteristics of chronic cough following SARS CoV-2 infection, aiming to assess its course, impact on patient well-being and predisposing factors. Methods: 113 patients were analysed as part of PREDICT UK follow up (NHS HRA: 20/HRA/2344) at 3 to 6 months (mean 152 days) after admission for a PCR positive SARS CoV2 infection. The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were examined to assess contributing mechanisms that may predispose to chronic cough (defined as >8 weeks following SARS CoV2 infection). Results: 41.5% patients did not have a cough. In contrast, 24% of patients had an acute cough (<3 weeks), 10.6% had subacute cough (3 to 8 weeks), and 21.6% had chronic cough (>8 weeks). 1.7% of patients had a pre-existing cough, unchanged following COVID-19. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are summarised in Table 1.50% of the cough group had a pre-existing lung disease (mainly airways disease), compared to 16% of patients without cough (P < 0.001). No differences in hypoxia, inflammation or infection markers (CRP) were noted between the 2 groups at admission. Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) was significantly reduced in those with cough compared with the non-cough group (32.2% vs 57.7%;P = 0.02). No significant differences in cough was noted between patients treated with different ventilator support strategies i.e. ITU and CPAP vs simple oxygen supplementation. Conclusions: This study notes a prevalence of chronic cough in 21.6% of patients post COVID-19. This was not associated with airway obstruction, reducing the likelihood of post infective bronchoconstriction. There was a significant reduction in DLCO consistent with post-infective interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study has looked at first-wave patients where dexamethasone was minimally used. Future studies reviewing cough with steroids therapy in patients requiring oxygen supplementation may note reduced levels of chronic cough. The use of cough as marker of post- COVID ILD warrants investigation. The current findings are in keeping with previous reports in SARS and MERS, where DLCO impairments were noted with time resolution of up to two years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19感染后慢性咳嗽的患病率:一项横断面研究
理由:SARS CoV-2感染与包括咳嗽在内的长期后遗症有关。SARS - CoV-2感染后慢性咳嗽的临床病程和治疗方法尚不清楚。本研究调查了SARS - CoV-2感染后慢性咳嗽的患病率和特征,旨在评估其病程、对患者健康的影响和易感因素。方法:113例PCR阳性SARS CoV2感染患者入院后3 ~ 6个月(平均152天),作为PREDICT UK随访的一部分(NHS HRA: 20/HRA/2344)进行分析。研究了基线临床和人口学特征,以评估可能易患慢性咳嗽的机制(定义为SARS CoV2感染后8周)。结果:41.5%患者无咳嗽。相比之下,24%的患者出现急性咳嗽(3周),10.6%的患者出现亚急性咳嗽(3 ~ 8周),21.6%的患者出现慢性咳嗽(8周)。1.7%的患者先前患有咳嗽,在COVID-19之后没有变化。研究人群的人口学和临床特征总结于表1.50%的咳嗽组有先前存在的肺部疾病(主要是呼吸道疾病),而16%的无咳嗽患者(P <0.001)。入院时两组患者缺氧、炎症及感染标志物(CRP)均无差异。咳嗽组与非咳嗽组相比,一氧化碳弥散能力(DLCO)显著降低(32.2% vs 57.7%;P = 0.02)。采用不同呼吸机支持策略(即ITU和CPAP与简单补氧)治疗的患者咳嗽无显著差异。结论:本研究指出,21.6%的COVID-19后患者患有慢性咳嗽。这与气道阻塞无关,减少了感染后支气管收缩的可能性。DLCO的显著降低与感染后间质性肺疾病(ILD)一致。这项研究观察了地塞米松最低限度使用的第一波患者。对需要补氧的患者使用类固醇治疗咳嗽的未来研究可能会注意到慢性咳嗽水平的降低。使用咳嗽作为新冠肺炎后ILD的标志物值得研究。目前的发现与之前关于SARS和MERS的报告一致,在这些报告中,DLCO损伤的时间分辨率最高可达两年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes in Proning Critically Ill Obese Patients Infected with COVID-19 Pneumonia - The PROSECOVA Trial Influence of Hypoxemia on Lymphocytes Subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia The COVID19 Experience: Preliminary Results in 1651 Patients at Two Multi-Ethnic Community Hospitals in NYC Prone Positioning to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19 Patients Outside Critical Care (PRONE-COVID Study) Admission Respiratory Rate-Oxygenation (ROX) Index and Outcome in COVID-19 Pneumonia with Acute Respiratory Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1