O perfil facial e a prevalência de canal mandibular bífido

Isaura Cristina Senna de Oliveira, Milena Bortolloto Felippe Silva, Ricardo Raitz
{"title":"O perfil facial e a prevalência de canal mandibular bífido","authors":"Isaura Cristina Senna de Oliveira, Milena Bortolloto Felippe Silva, Ricardo Raitz","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.173249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of bifid mandibular canals (BMC) and correlate them with facial types (FT), using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and method: The sample, composed of 180 hemimandibles (90 patients), was determined by FT, sex, age and side of the face. The FT was determined using the Ricketts VERT index. The CBCT were divided into three groups according to the TF: 30 brachyfacial, 30 mesofacial and 30 dolichofacial patients. The BMC were classified according to Naitoh et al. (2011). The images were classified and evaluated by a trained radiologist, using the Dolphin Imaging® 11.0 and XoranCat® software. The groups were compared according to sex, affected side and BMC class by the Qui-square test or Fisher’s exact test; the influence of age compared to sex and presence of BMC by the Mann-Whitney test and compared to FT by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The relationship between patient sex and presence of BMC was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. A 5% significance level was considered in all tests. Results: The proportion of patients with BMC in the sample was 14.4%, with the most frequent type C alveolar (53.8%), followed by types D retromolar (15.4%), E lingual (15.4%) and F mandible base (7.7%). When CMB was present, there was no side predominance and patient’s sex influence. Conclusion: FT does not affect the presence or type of BMC.","PeriodicalId":10204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.173249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of bifid mandibular canals (BMC) and correlate them with facial types (FT), using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and method: The sample, composed of 180 hemimandibles (90 patients), was determined by FT, sex, age and side of the face. The FT was determined using the Ricketts VERT index. The CBCT were divided into three groups according to the TF: 30 brachyfacial, 30 mesofacial and 30 dolichofacial patients. The BMC were classified according to Naitoh et al. (2011). The images were classified and evaluated by a trained radiologist, using the Dolphin Imaging® 11.0 and XoranCat® software. The groups were compared according to sex, affected side and BMC class by the Qui-square test or Fisher’s exact test; the influence of age compared to sex and presence of BMC by the Mann-Whitney test and compared to FT by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The relationship between patient sex and presence of BMC was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. A 5% significance level was considered in all tests. Results: The proportion of patients with BMC in the sample was 14.4%, with the most frequent type C alveolar (53.8%), followed by types D retromolar (15.4%), E lingual (15.4%) and F mandible base (7.7%). When CMB was present, there was no side predominance and patient’s sex influence. Conclusion: FT does not affect the presence or type of BMC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完成面部手术prevalência下颌管bífido
目的:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评价下颌双裂管(BMC)的患病率及其与面部类型(FT)的相关性。材料与方法:根据FT、性别、年龄、面部侧边,选取180例半下颌患者(90例)作为样本。FT是用Ricketts VERT指数确定的。CBCT根据TF分为3组:30例近面、30例面膜、30例面膜。BMC的分类依据Naitoh et al.(2011)。由训练有素的放射科医生使用Dolphin Imaging®11.0和XoranCat®软件对图像进行分类和评估。采用奎方检验或Fisher精确检验对各组按性别、发病部位、BMC分类进行比较;通过Mann-Whitney测试和Kruskal-Wallis测试比较年龄对性别和BMC存在的影响。采用Fisher精确检验分析患者性别与BMC存在的关系。在所有测试中考虑5%的显著性水平。结果:BMC患者占14.4%,以C型牙槽最多(53.8%),其次为D型后磨牙(15.4%)、E型舌(15.4%)、F型下颌骨(7.7%)。当CMB存在时,没有副作用优势和患者性别的影响。结论:FT不影响BMC的存在和类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recorrências locais de tumores de glândulas salivares em uma população brasileira Utilização da distração óssea no tratamento de pacientes com Sequência de Pierre Robin Relação entre alterações ósseas detectadas na panorâmica e osteoporose Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements in CBCT images with different field of views Antimicrobial photodynamic and photobiomodulation adjuvant therapies for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw – Report of two cases with long-term follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1