Investigating the Motivating Potential of Software Development Methods: Insights from a Work Design Perspective

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.17705/1PAIS.09404
Adarsh Kumar Kakar
{"title":"Investigating the Motivating Potential of Software Development Methods: Insights from a Work Design Perspective","authors":"Adarsh Kumar Kakar","doi":"10.17705/1PAIS.09404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we view Software Development Methods (SDMs) through the perspective of work design. The objective is to gain understanding into the inherent potential of the two major paradigms of software development, the Plan-driven and Agile methods, to motivate team members of software development projects. The work design perspective is relevant for investigating the motivating impacts of SDMs. The increasing popularity of people focused Agile methods over process focused Plan-driven methods in the 2000s mirror the increasing popularity of non-Taylorist work designs over Taylorist work designs in the 1980s. Work design concepts in parallel disciplines such as manufacturing evolved from the Taylorist focus on specialization and time and motion studies to adopting autonomous self-managed teams and creating employee programs like quality circles. Gleaning concepts from the widely accepted Job Characteristic Model (Hackman and Qldham, 1976) for work design, and the SelfDetermination Theory (Deci and Ryan, 1985), one of the most prominent theories of motivation, provided useful insights. Together they could explain and predict the differential impacts of plandriven and Agile methods of software development on team member motivation.","PeriodicalId":43480,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","volume":"25 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1PAIS.09404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study we view Software Development Methods (SDMs) through the perspective of work design. The objective is to gain understanding into the inherent potential of the two major paradigms of software development, the Plan-driven and Agile methods, to motivate team members of software development projects. The work design perspective is relevant for investigating the motivating impacts of SDMs. The increasing popularity of people focused Agile methods over process focused Plan-driven methods in the 2000s mirror the increasing popularity of non-Taylorist work designs over Taylorist work designs in the 1980s. Work design concepts in parallel disciplines such as manufacturing evolved from the Taylorist focus on specialization and time and motion studies to adopting autonomous self-managed teams and creating employee programs like quality circles. Gleaning concepts from the widely accepted Job Characteristic Model (Hackman and Qldham, 1976) for work design, and the SelfDetermination Theory (Deci and Ryan, 1985), one of the most prominent theories of motivation, provided useful insights. Together they could explain and predict the differential impacts of plandriven and Agile methods of software development on team member motivation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查软件开发方法的激励潜力:从工作设计角度的见解
在本研究中,我们从工作设计的角度来看待软件开发方法(SDMs)。目标是了解软件开发的两种主要范例的内在潜力,即计划驱动和敏捷方法,以激励软件开发项目的团队成员。工作设计视角与研究sdm的激励影响相关。2000年代,以人为中心的敏捷方法越来越受欢迎,而不是以过程为中心的计划驱动方法,这反映了20世纪80年代,非泰勒式工作设计越来越受欢迎,而不是泰勒式工作设计。平行学科的工作设计概念,如制造业,从泰勒主义者关注专业化、时间和运动研究,发展到采用自主的自我管理团队,并创建员工计划,如质量圈。从工作设计中广泛接受的工作特征模型(Hackman and Qldham, 1976)和自我决定理论(Deci and Ryan, 1985)中收集概念,这是最突出的动机理论之一,提供了有用的见解。他们一起可以解释和预测计划驱动和敏捷软件开发方法对团队成员动机的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Campaign Presentation Cues on Crowdfunding Performance – Reviewing the Empirical Reward-Based Crowdfunding Literature Getting Around to It: How Design Science Researchers Set Future Work Agendas Beyond Digital Data and Information Technology: Conceptualizing Data-Driven Culture Digital Nudge Stacking and Backfiring: Understanding Sustainable E-Commerce Purchase Decisions Improvisational and Dynamic Capabilities as Drivers of Business Model Innovation: An Enterprise Architecture Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1