Accurately Predicting Quartz Sand Thermal Conductivity Using Machine Learning and Grey-Box AI Models

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Environmental geotechnics Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.3390/geotechnics3030035
Abolfazl Baghbani, H. Abuel-Naga, Danial Shirkavand
{"title":"Accurately Predicting Quartz Sand Thermal Conductivity Using Machine Learning and Grey-Box AI Models","authors":"Abolfazl Baghbani, H. Abuel-Naga, Danial Shirkavand","doi":"10.3390/geotechnics3030035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thermal conductivity of materials is a crucial property with diverse applications, particularly in engineering. Understanding soil thermal conductivity is crucial for designing efficient geothermal systems, predicting soil temperatures, and assessing soil contamination. This paper aimed to predict quartz sand thermal conductivity by using four mathematical models: multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), classification and regression random forest (CRRF), and genetic programming (GP). A grey-box AI method, GP, was used for the first time in this topic. Seven inputs affecting thermal conductivity were evaluated in the study, including sand porosity, degree of saturation, coefficient of uniformity, coefficient of curvature, mean particle size, and minimum and maximum void ratios. In predicting thermal conductivity, the MLR model performed poorly, with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.737 and a mean absolute error MAE = 0.300. Both ANN models using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm and the Bayesian Regularization (BR) algorithm outperformed the MLR model with an accuracy of R2 = 0.916 and an error of MAE = 0.151. In addition, the CRRF model had the best accuracy of R2 = 0.993 and MAE = 0.045. In addition, GP showed acceptable performance in predicting sand thermal conductivity. The R2 and MAE values of GP were 0.986 and 0.063, respectively. This paper presents the best GP equation for evaluating other databases. Additionally, the porosity and saturation of the sand were found to have the greatest impact on the model results, while coefficients of curvature and uniformity had the least influence. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that grey-box artificial intelligence models can be used to accurately predict quartz sand thermal conductivity.","PeriodicalId":11823,"journal":{"name":"Environmental geotechnics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3030035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The thermal conductivity of materials is a crucial property with diverse applications, particularly in engineering. Understanding soil thermal conductivity is crucial for designing efficient geothermal systems, predicting soil temperatures, and assessing soil contamination. This paper aimed to predict quartz sand thermal conductivity by using four mathematical models: multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), classification and regression random forest (CRRF), and genetic programming (GP). A grey-box AI method, GP, was used for the first time in this topic. Seven inputs affecting thermal conductivity were evaluated in the study, including sand porosity, degree of saturation, coefficient of uniformity, coefficient of curvature, mean particle size, and minimum and maximum void ratios. In predicting thermal conductivity, the MLR model performed poorly, with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.737 and a mean absolute error MAE = 0.300. Both ANN models using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm and the Bayesian Regularization (BR) algorithm outperformed the MLR model with an accuracy of R2 = 0.916 and an error of MAE = 0.151. In addition, the CRRF model had the best accuracy of R2 = 0.993 and MAE = 0.045. In addition, GP showed acceptable performance in predicting sand thermal conductivity. The R2 and MAE values of GP were 0.986 and 0.063, respectively. This paper presents the best GP equation for evaluating other databases. Additionally, the porosity and saturation of the sand were found to have the greatest impact on the model results, while coefficients of curvature and uniformity had the least influence. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that grey-box artificial intelligence models can be used to accurately predict quartz sand thermal conductivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习和灰盒人工智能模型准确预测石英砂导热性
材料的导热性是一项具有多种应用的关键特性,特别是在工程中。了解土壤导热系数对于设计有效的地热系统、预测土壤温度和评估土壤污染至关重要。采用多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANN)、分类回归随机森林(CRRF)和遗传规划(GP) 4种数学模型对石英砂导热系数进行预测。本课题首次使用了灰盒人工智能方法GP。研究评估了影响导热系数的7个参数,包括孔隙度、饱和度、均匀系数、曲率系数、平均粒径、最小和最大空隙比。在预测导热系数方面,MLR模型表现不佳,决定系数R2 = 0.737,平均绝对误差MAE = 0.300。采用Levenberg-Marquardt算法和贝叶斯正则化(Bayesian Regularization, BR)算法的ANN模型均优于MLR模型,准确率R2 = 0.916,误差MAE = 0.151。CRRF模型的准确率最高,R2 = 0.993, MAE = 0.045。此外,GP在预测砂土热导率方面表现良好。GP的R2和MAE值分别为0.986和0.063。本文给出了评价其他数据库的最佳GP方程。砂岩孔隙度和饱和度对模型结果的影响最大,曲率系数和均匀性系数的影响最小。总体而言,本研究结果表明,灰盒人工智能模型可以用于准确预测石英砂导热系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental geotechnics
Environmental geotechnics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: In 21st century living, engineers and researchers need to deal with growing problems related to climate change, oil and water storage, handling, storage and disposal of toxic and hazardous wastes, remediation of contaminated sites, sustainable development and energy derived from the ground. Environmental Geotechnics aims to disseminate knowledge and provides a fresh perspective regarding the basic concepts, theory, techniques and field applicability of innovative testing and analysis methodologies and engineering practices in geoenvironmental engineering. The journal''s Editor in Chief is a Member of the Committee on Publication Ethics. All relevant papers are carefully considered, vetted by a distinguished team of international experts and rapidly published. Full research papers, short communications and comprehensive review articles are published under the following broad subject categories: geochemistry and geohydrology, soil and rock physics, biological processes in soil, soil-atmosphere interaction, electrical, electromagnetic and thermal characteristics of porous media, waste management, utilization of wastes, multiphase science, landslide wasting, soil and water conservation, sensor development and applications, the impact of climatic changes on geoenvironmental, geothermal/ground-source energy, carbon sequestration, oil and gas extraction techniques, uncertainty, reliability and risk, monitoring and forensic geotechnics.
期刊最新文献
Ecological flexible protection method of expansive soil slope under rainfall Briefing: Intensive inland aquaculture ponds: challenges and research opportunities 1D Damage constitutive model and small strain characteristics of fly ash–cementitious iron tailings powder under static and dynamic loading Experimental investigation on gas migration behaviour in unsaturated sand-clay mixture Dry shrinkage cracking and permeability of biopolymer-modified clay under dry-wet cycles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1