Beyond The ‘Binaries’: A Methodological Intervention for Interrogating Maps as Representational Practices

ACME Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI:10.1002/9780470979587.CH13
Vincent J. Del Casino, Stephen P. Hanna
{"title":"Beyond The ‘Binaries’: A Methodological Intervention for Interrogating Maps as Representational Practices","authors":"Vincent J. Del Casino, Stephen P. Hanna","doi":"10.1002/9780470979587.CH13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, a growing number of geographers and cartographic historians have critically examined maps as products imbued with power, the social contexts of map production, and the intimate involvement of cartography in Western imperialism and the enlightenment project. More recently, a few scholars have applied critical approaches to studies of map use and interpretation. Much of this work reproduces, at least implicitly, a series of binaries that separate maps as representations of space from spatial practices. In this paper, we offer a methodological intervention by introducing a theorization of ‘map spaces’ as a way to move beyond the duality of representational and non-representational theory in critical cartography. Methodologically framing how we can interrogate the binaries of representation/practice, production/consumption, conceptualization/interpretation, and corporeality/sociality upon which so much analysis is based affords us the opportunity to challenge the presumptions of critical cartography as either the study of mapmaking or map use. We use a tourism map of Fredericksburg, Virginia to demonstrate how to ‘move beyond’ a critical cartography that is based, as some suggest, in an analysis of representation and not practice.","PeriodicalId":39706,"journal":{"name":"ACME","volume":"69 1","pages":"34-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"180","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.CH13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 180

Abstract

Over the past two decades, a growing number of geographers and cartographic historians have critically examined maps as products imbued with power, the social contexts of map production, and the intimate involvement of cartography in Western imperialism and the enlightenment project. More recently, a few scholars have applied critical approaches to studies of map use and interpretation. Much of this work reproduces, at least implicitly, a series of binaries that separate maps as representations of space from spatial practices. In this paper, we offer a methodological intervention by introducing a theorization of ‘map spaces’ as a way to move beyond the duality of representational and non-representational theory in critical cartography. Methodologically framing how we can interrogate the binaries of representation/practice, production/consumption, conceptualization/interpretation, and corporeality/sociality upon which so much analysis is based affords us the opportunity to challenge the presumptions of critical cartography as either the study of mapmaking or map use. We use a tourism map of Fredericksburg, Virginia to demonstrate how to ‘move beyond’ a critical cartography that is based, as some suggest, in an analysis of representation and not practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越“二元”:作为代表性实践的质疑地图的方法论干预
在过去的二十年里,越来越多的地理学家和地图历史学家批判性地研究了作为充满权力的产品的地图,地图制作的社会背景,以及制图学在西方帝国主义和启蒙运动中的密切参与。最近,一些学者将批判性方法应用于地图使用和解释的研究。这项工作的大部分,至少是含蓄地,复制了一系列的二进制,将地图作为空间的表示与空间实践分开。在本文中,我们通过引入“地图空间”的理论化来提供方法论干预,作为一种超越批判性制图中代表性和非代表性理论的二元性的方法。从方法论上构建我们如何询问表征/实践、生产/消费、概念化/解释和物质性/社会性等二元性的方法,为我们提供了挑战批判性地图学的假设的机会,无论是研究地图制作还是地图使用。我们使用弗吉尼亚州弗雷德里克斯堡的旅游地图来展示如何“超越”批判性制图,正如一些人所建议的那样,这是基于对代表性的分析而不是实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACME
ACME Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ACME is an on-line international journal for critical and radical analyses of the social, the spatial and the political. The journal"s purpose is to provide a forum for the publication of critical and radical work about space in the social sciences - including anarchist, anti-racist, environmentalist, feminist, Marxist, non-representational, postcolonial, poststructuralist, queer, situationist and socialist perspectives. Analyses that are critical and radical are understood to be part of the praxis of social and political change aimed at challenging, dismantling, and transforming prevalent relations, systems, and structures of capitalist exploitation, oppression, imperialism, neo-liberalism, national aggression, and environmental destruction.
期刊最新文献
myth of mankind and the representation of people in Late 18th-century British dictionaries of trade and commerce Prometeo e il destino nel nome: [Aesch.] Pr. 86 Romolo divino, Romolo fatto a pezzi. L’uso politico del mito della scomparsa del primo re alla fine della Repubblica Rosa Calzecchi Onesti studiosa di varianti d’autore Ripartenza postbellica in due mostre a Roma, in Palazzo Venezia, negli anni 1944 e 1945
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1