Confronting Cannabis: Legalization on Native Nation Lands and the Impacts of Differential Federal Enforcement

Courtney Lewis
{"title":"Confronting Cannabis: Legalization on Native Nation Lands and the Impacts of Differential Federal Enforcement","authors":"Courtney Lewis","doi":"10.5250/amerindiquar.43.4.0408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In December 2014 the United States Department of Justice released a policy statement directing United States Attorney’s Offices to consult with Native Nations regarding growing and selling marijuana on sovereign Native nation lands. Additionally, rather than pursue blanket enforcement, the statement presented eight enforcement priorities. By August 2019 thirty-three states had legalized medical marijuana; eleven of these plus the District of Columbia had also legalized recreational marijuana. Given the positive impacts seen in these states (increased tax revenue and reductions in substance abuse and crime rates), some Native Nations passed their own laws legalizing medical, recreational, or agricultural cannabis. However, these efforts have been obstructed by the US Drug Enforcement Agency’s contradictory and erratic actions. This article examines the impacts of this targeted differential enforcement of cannabis laws on Native Nations’ cannabis decisions by discussing the racialized development of cannabis laws, how legalization differs between states and Native Nations, impacts of legalization on Native Nations’ sovereignty practices, concerns of Native nation citizens about legalization (including opposition to legalization), and legalization’s potential long-term effects. Finally, the impacts of these national actions are shown in a brief examination of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians’ recent movement toward legalization of medical marijuana.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":"408 - 438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.43.4.0408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:In December 2014 the United States Department of Justice released a policy statement directing United States Attorney’s Offices to consult with Native Nations regarding growing and selling marijuana on sovereign Native nation lands. Additionally, rather than pursue blanket enforcement, the statement presented eight enforcement priorities. By August 2019 thirty-three states had legalized medical marijuana; eleven of these plus the District of Columbia had also legalized recreational marijuana. Given the positive impacts seen in these states (increased tax revenue and reductions in substance abuse and crime rates), some Native Nations passed their own laws legalizing medical, recreational, or agricultural cannabis. However, these efforts have been obstructed by the US Drug Enforcement Agency’s contradictory and erratic actions. This article examines the impacts of this targeted differential enforcement of cannabis laws on Native Nations’ cannabis decisions by discussing the racialized development of cannabis laws, how legalization differs between states and Native Nations, impacts of legalization on Native Nations’ sovereignty practices, concerns of Native nation citizens about legalization (including opposition to legalization), and legalization’s potential long-term effects. Finally, the impacts of these national actions are shown in a brief examination of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians’ recent movement toward legalization of medical marijuana.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对大麻:土著民族土地上的合法化和不同联邦执法的影响
摘要:2014年12月,美国司法部发布了一份政策声明,指示联邦检察官办公室就在土著民族主权土地上种植和销售大麻征求土著民族的意见。此外,声明没有追求全面执法,而是提出了八项执法重点。截至2019年8月,33个州将医用大麻合法化;其中11个州加上哥伦比亚特区也将娱乐性大麻合法化。鉴于在这些州看到的积极影响(增加税收和减少药物滥用和犯罪率),一些土著民族通过了自己的法律,使医疗、娱乐或农业大麻合法化。然而,这些努力一直受到美国缉毒局矛盾和不稳定行动的阻碍。本文通过讨论大麻法律的种族化发展、大麻合法化在各州和土著民族之间的差异、大麻合法化对土著民族主权实践的影响、土著民族公民对大麻合法化的关注(包括反对大麻合法化)以及大麻合法化潜在的长期影响,来考察大麻法律的针对性差别执行对土著民族大麻决策的影响。最后,这些国家行动的影响在对东部切罗基印第安人最近走向医用大麻合法化的运动的简要考察中得到了体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doodem and Council Fire: Anishinaabe Governance through Alliance by Heidi Bohaker (review) The Enduring Flame: Stress, Epigenetics, and the California Indian 1769–2000 Strawtown Koteewi: Indiana, NAGPRA, and the Culture of Noncompliance Choctaw Confederates: The American Civil War in Indian Country by Fay A. Yarbrough (review) Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1